![]() |
Todays metro, Graffiti artest wanted
|
Todays metro, Graffiti artest wanted
"Rob" wrote in message ... http://tube.tfl.gov.uk/content/press...8.asp#graffiti Wonder if they have pictures of TOX?? I am pretty liberal about crime, but for some reason graffiti gets my hackles up. I think it's partly because the vandals become all self-righteous when they are nabbed and start babbling on about 'art' and all that crap. |
Todays metro, Graffiti artest wanted
"Alan O'Brien" wrote in message ... "Rob" wrote in message ... http://tube.tfl.gov.uk/content/press...8.asp#graffiti Wonder if they have pictures of TOX?? I am pretty liberal about crime, but for some reason graffiti gets my hackles up. I think it's partly because the vandals become all self-righteous when they are nabbed and start babbling on about 'art' and all that crap. Hang 'em! |
Todays metro, Graffiti artest wanted
"Ed Crowley" wrote in message
... Hang 'em! That's overdoing it a bit, but it would be fun to look out the window of a South London train and see them chained to a cutting wall for a fortnight. -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
Todays metro, Graffiti artest wanted
"John Rowland" wrote in message
... That's overdoing it a bit, but it would be fun to look out the window of a South London train and see them chained to a cutting wall for a fortnight. Covered in paint! |
Todays metro, Graffiti artest wanted
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 12:36:11 +0100, Ed Crowley wrote:
I am pretty liberal about crime, but for some reason graffiti gets my hackles up. I think it's partly because the vandals become all self-righteous when they are nabbed and start babbling on about 'art' and all that crap. Hang 'em! Naah, not cruel enough Make 'em commute on the buisiest lines in the coutry every rush hour for the next 2 weeks |
Todays metro, Graffiti artest wanted
"Alan O'Brien" wrote in message ... "Rob" wrote in message ... http://tube.tfl.gov.uk/content/press...8.asp#graffiti Wonder if they have pictures of TOX?? I am pretty liberal about crime, but for some reason graffiti gets my hackles up. I think it's partly because the vandals become all self-righteous when they are nabbed and start babbling on about 'art' and all that crap. Personally, I consider seeing every spare square inch covered in banal advertising far more unpleasant than graffiti but I do hate seeing windows scratched on trains. -- Kat in Downtown Toronto |
Todays metro, Graffiti artest wanted
Paul Weaver typed
Naah, not cruel enough Make 'em commute on the buisiest lines in the coutry every rush hour for the next 2 weeks Yebbut that would overcrowd them further, thus punishing the innocent co-commuters... -- Helen D. Vecht: Edgware. |
Todays metro, Graffiti artest wanted
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 11:39:43 +0100, "Alan O'Brien"
wrote: I am pretty liberal about crime, but for some reason graffiti gets my hackles up. Liberal on crime, Liberal on the causes of crime? Cheers, Jason. |
Todays metro, Graffiti artest wanted
wrote in message ...
In article , (Rob) wrote: http://tube.tfl.gov.uk/content/press...8.asp#graffiti Wonder if they have pictures of TOX?? So they were lucky enough to have the person caught on a unit where the saloon CCTV equipment was actually working. All they need to do now is get the dud 30-40% saloon CCTVs working to perhaps catch somebody elsee at it. Roger I too prefer seeing grafitti to adverstising on the tube, I don't like the window scratches though, or on good architecture. I think some of it looks alright, and TOX seems to know about the tube at least, he/she tags where signals are and at window height for maximum exposure. TOX could make a better effort in his/her work though. I actually think some of the stuff done on a couple of district line trains is good, better than the lack of paint on it. LU should invite a few famous grafitti artists to do up a few trains on the District, be a good publicity stunt. I am resigned to there being a problem on the network, I don't think there is much anyone can do to stop the stuff going up, a lot of them cant be prosecuted as they're too young and it is the fault of LU, letting people get in their property esp. near depots (which seems to be a speciality of TOX), I mean if a 15 year old can do it a terrorist can and blow up the whole rolling stock of a tube line. Best to have fun working out how they got to the places along the route rather than complain. |
Todays metro, Graffiti artest wanted
"Rob" wrote in message ... Looks like a spell-checker is needed too. ;-) -- Brian "What's the point in growing up if you can't behave like a kid when you want to." |
Todays metro, Graffiti artest wanted
CJC wrote:
I too prefer seeing grafitti to adverstising on the tube, I don't like the window scratches though, or on good architecture. I think some of it looks alright, and TOX seems to know about the tube at least, he/she tags where signals are and at window height for maximum exposure. TOX could make a better effort in his/her work though. I actually think some of the stuff done on a couple of district line trains is good, better than the lack of paint on it. LU should invite a few famous grafitti artists to do up a few trains on the District, be a good publicity stunt. That is utter rubbish IMO. TOX just paints his tag on any unused surface that he can reach. Many of his efforts have vandalised brick walls that have stood in their quiet dignified way for over a century. The unpainted District line trains would look a lot better if they didn't have to be subjected to harmful cleaning agents to remove the grafitti. And please don't try to elevate these vandals to the status of "artists". It's criminal damage pure and simple. Would you like your home defaced in this way? -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
Todays metro, Graffiti artest wanted
"Richard J." wrote the following in:
CJC wrote: I too prefer seeing grafitti to adverstising on the tube, I don't like the window scratches though, or on good architecture. I think some of it looks alright, and TOX seems to know about the tube at least, he/she tags where signals are and at window height for maximum exposure. TOX could make a better effort in his/her work though. I actually think some of the stuff done on a couple of district line trains is good, better than the lack of paint on it. LU should invite a few famous grafitti artists to do up a few trains on the District, be a good publicity stunt. That is utter rubbish IMO. TOX just paints his tag on any unused surface that he can reach. Many of his efforts have vandalised brick walls that have stood in their quiet dignified way for over a century. The unpainted District line trains would look a lot better if they didn't have to be subjected to harmful cleaning agents to remove the grafitti. And please don't try to elevate these vandals to the status of "artists". It's criminal damage pure and simple. I agree with everything you say here. The thing about the graffiti that you get on tube property is that it simply isn't the kind of graffiti that can be considered art. It's just a load of crap, unimaginative tags that make otherwise pleasant looking trains ugly. There's one of those designated graffiti area type things near my house, and some of the stuff you get there is amazingly good. It really transforms a dull concrete bridge (coincidentally it's a bridge over the District line), and it's definitely a vast improvement. Anyone trying to label the crap TOX is guilty of as art should see the real thing first. -- message by Robin May, consumer of liquids Hello. I'm one of those "roaring fascists of the left wing". Hacker is to computer as boy racer is to Ford Escort. |
Todays metro, Graffiti artest wanted
"CJC" wrote in message om... wrote in message ... In article , (Rob) wrote: http://tube.tfl.gov.uk/content/press...8.asp#graffiti Wonder if they have pictures of TOX?? So they were lucky enough to have the person caught on a unit where the saloon CCTV equipment was actually working. All they need to do now is get the dud 30-40% saloon CCTVs working to perhaps catch somebody elsee at it. Roger I too prefer seeing grafitti to adverstising on the tube, I don't like the window scratches though, or on good architecture. I think some of it looks alright, and TOX seems to know about the tube at least, he/she tags where signals are and at window height for maximum exposure. TOX could make a better effort in his/her work though. His/her *work*?! This kind of behaviour is not clever or a form of art - it's criminal damage that costs taxpayers hundreds of millions of pounds a year in the UK. It also heightens peoples fear of crime, as these tags are essentially gangs "marking their territory". I am resigned to there being a problem on the network, That's the spirit! I don't think there is much anyone can do to stop the stuff going up, a lot of them cant be prosecuted as they're too young and it is the fault of LU, letting people get in their property esp. near depots (which seems to be a speciality of TOX) It's not the fault of LU. They seem to invest a lot of money in fences, CCTV and razor wire along the tracks and depots. Is it *your* fault if someone breaks into your house because you didn't have bars on your windows? |
Todays metro, Graffiti artest wanted
wrote in message ...
In article , (Rob) wrote: http://tube.tfl.gov.uk/content/press...8.asp#graffiti Wonder if they have pictures of TOX?? So they were lucky enough to have the person caught on a unit where the saloon CCTV equipment was actually working. All they need to do now is get the dud 30-40% saloon CCTVs working to perhaps catch somebody elsee at it. Roger Shame the picture of his face was so blurred as to be almost useless. What is it with CCTV vendors? WHy are the pictures from their systems so goddamn crap? You can get a tiny CCD device in a camera or video camera and it produces FAR better pictures than CCTV. B2003 |
Todays metro, Graffiti artest wanted
"Ed Crowley" typed
It's not the fault of LU. They seem to invest a lot of money in fences, CCTV and razor wire along the tracks and depots. Is it *your* fault if someone breaks into your house because you didn't have bars on your windows? The police almost suggested that, when I was burgled, it was my fault for not having a burglar alarm... I HATE BLAMING THE VICTIMS! -- Helen D. Vecht: Edgware. |
Todays metro, Graffiti artest wanted
In article ,
(Boltar) wrote: wrote in message ... In article , (Rob) wrote: http://tube.tfl.gov.uk/content/press...8.asp#graffiti Wonder if they have pictures of TOX?? So they were lucky enough to have the person caught on a unit where the saloon CCTV equipment was actually working. All they need to do now is get the dud 30-40% saloon CCTVs working to perhaps catch somebody elsee at it. Roger Shame the picture of his face was so blurred as to be almost useless. What is it with CCTV vendors? WHy are the pictures from their systems so goddamn crap? You can get a tiny CCD device in a camera or video camera and it produces FAR better pictures than CCTV. B2003 Most of the time the pictures from the cameras are recorded at very slow speed in time lapse, which means that the results are next to useless for any real purpose. Plus, they are generally recorded to tape. Digital (which the buses are supposed to have) would be a much better quality. Roger |
Todays metro, Graffiti artest wanted
As 16 Oct 2003 11:54:43 -0700 appeared fresh and rosy-fingered,
(CJC) wrote: LU should invite a few famous grafitti artists to do up a few trains on the District, be a good publicity stunt. How about inviting these "artists" to decorate a dark and sound-proof alley, and telling law-abiding passengers the location and time. And then leaving some blunt objects scattered around the approaches to the alley, and arranging for the police to all be somewhere else for a few hours. -- Arthur Figgis |
Todays metro, Graffiti artest wanted
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 14:26:48 +0000, romic wrote:
Most of the time the pictures from the cameras are recorded at very slow speed in time lapse, which means that the results are next to useless for Shouldn't affect the picture quality though, just the frames/second any real purpose. Plus, they are generally recorded to tape. Digital (which the buses are supposed to have) would be a much better quality. Hang on, TV is produced on tape, much of it on DVC Pro, which gives a great quality picture. As for camera size, you can get broadcast quality cameras only a few inches long and maybe an inch wide |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk