![]() |
Reprogramability of ticketing etc.
During a short break in London last weekend, I bought a day return ticket
from KXSP Thameslink to Gravesend (intending to change at London Bridge). Only then did I discover that Thameslink services are not currently running between Blackfriars and Kentish Town on weekends to permit work on the new station under Midland Way. Although this situation, in which Thameslink passengers concerned are advised to use the Northern Line between those stations, has long been planned and will continue for many months, little if anything has been done to adapt the computer-printed Thameslink tickets. In particular, the one I bought bears the words 'Route: Not Underground' and indeed it was rejected by the gates at London Bridge (and Bank/Monument on my return via Cannon St.). Surely one of the great advantages of computerised ticketing systems is that they can be reprogrammed when required to take account of such changes in routing (and incidentally ensure that receipts are attributed correctly). So why is this not done in practice? On the same journey, I was irritated to hear the computerised announcement on approaching Old Street and Moorgate stations that passengers 'should change here for main line rail services' when, of course, there are no such services there (nor, indeed, any National Rail services) on Saturdays and Sundays. If it is too difficult to have different announcements on weekdays and weekends, then why does the standard announcement not say that passengers 'should change here for National Rail services except on weekends'? Such obvious absurdities suggest that the systems in London were designed by the Sorcerer's apprentice... Regards, - Alan (in Brussels) |
Reprogramability of ticketing etc.
"Alan (in Brussels)" wrote in message ... During a short break in London last weekend, I bought a day return ticket from KXSP Thameslink to Gravesend (intending to change at London Bridge). Only then did I discover that Thameslink services are not currently running between Blackfriars and Kentish Town on weekends to permit work on the new station under Midland Way. Although this situation, in which Thameslink passengers concerned are advised to use the Northern Line between those stations, has long been planned and will continue for many months, little if anything has been done to adapt the computer-printed Thameslink tickets. In particular, the one I bought bears the words 'Route: Not Underground' and indeed it was rejected by the gates at London Bridge (and Bank/Monument on my return via Cannon St.). Surely one of the great advantages of computerised ticketing systems is that they can be reprogrammed when required to take account of such changes in routing (and incidentally ensure that receipts are attributed correctly). So why is this not done in practice?.... If you had said... "ensure that receipts are *distributed* correctly" - which may be part of your meaning - I think the answer would have suggested itself. Thameslink takes all the money for a 'not underground' ticket - but only part of the money if the tube is involved. They have probably calculated which type of ticket will bring them most revenue. Alan |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:44 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk