Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
One of the things I've noticed when travelling on Southern or South West
Trains in the commuter belt is that their carriages generally don't have any sets of three seats on one side of the aisle. By contrast the local National Express London to Shenfield service has the old layout with one side having three seats except for immediately adjacent to the vestibles or doors. London Overground services have a mix with some third seats removed, and also has some side-ways seating that creates more standing room. A consequence on the National Express services is that the trains get horrendously overcrowded, not least because it's hard to move down the carriages quickly and so passengers instead crowd in the vestible areas. Consequently these are often rampacked, with people physically forcing their way in at Stratford, whilst not every seat is used. This has led to more than one incident and I fear it won't be long before someone's badly hurt or worse. An obvious simple solution would be to remove the third seats in the carriages, thus creating wider aisles that allow more standing room and also make it easier to get out of the train in time. This could reduce some of the sardine effect, and very few more passengers would have to stand as it's rare for every seat to be taken even when there is a scrum. How do the other commuter carriages handle this? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim Roll-Pickering wrote:
One of the things I've noticed when travelling on Southern or South West Trains in the commuter belt is that their carriages generally don't have any sets of three seats on one side of the aisle. An obvious simple solution would be to remove the third seats in the carriages... ....and it led to a right old bashing by the media when SWT took the seats out didn't it. The 455s and the high capacity 450s all started out with 2+3 seating throughout, and the reduction in seated capacity is fairly recent in the overall scheme of things, ie within the last few years. Then because the standing capacity as a percentage of seated capacity is much increased they get grief for that as well whenever there is another 'seats for all' campaign in the Standard... Merseyrail are the only regional TOC to have done anything similar, but I'm not sure you are right about Southern, I think all their inner suburban 455s are all still 2+3. The London Overground 313s have had a number of 3rd seats removed, but of course that is nothing compared to their new 378s which have only longitudinal seats throughout. Paul S |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 5, 9:42*pm, "Paul Scott"
wrote: Merseyrail are the only regional TOC to have done anything similar, but I'm not sure you are right about Southern, I think all their inner suburban 455s are all still 2+3. Paul S They are indeed, and so are a great many of the carriages in their 377 fleet that operate the outer suburban runs, often all the way to the coast. Peter H |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Scott wrote:
Merseyrail are the only regional TOC to have done anything similar, but I'm not sure you are right about Southern, I think all their inner suburban 455s are all still 2+3. What definition of "inner suburban" do you mean though? I *think* I've seen 2+2 on some trains to both Epsom and Epsom Downs and location wise they're analagous to Shenfield, but I may be mistaken. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 6, 12:36 am, "Tim Roll-Pickering" T.C.Roll-
wrote: Paul Scott wrote: Merseyrail are the only regional TOC to have done anything similar, but I'm not sure you are right about Southern, I think all their inner suburban 455s are all still 2+3. What definition of "inner suburban" do you mean though? I *think* I've seen 2+2 on some trains to both Epsom and Epsom Downs and location wise they're analagous to Shenfield, but I may be mistaken. All their 455s are 2+3. It's possible that SN has run the occasional Electrostar on Epsom trains. -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John B" wrote in message ... On Jul 6, 12:36 am, "Tim Roll-Pickering" T.C.Roll- wrote: Paul Scott wrote: Merseyrail are the only regional TOC to have done anything similar, but I'm not sure you are right about Southern, I think all their inner suburban 455s are all still 2+3. What definition of "inner suburban" do you mean though? I *think* I've seen 2+2 on some trains to both Epsom and Epsom Downs and location wise they're analagous to Shenfield, but I may be mistaken. All their 455s are 2+3. It's possible that SN has run the occasional Electrostar on Epsom trains. Some of the Electrostars have a mix of 2+2 in the end cars, and 2+3 in the intermediates, so what you see dependson where you happen to get on... Paul S |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 July, 21:57, wrote:
In article , (Tim Roll-Pickering) wrote: *Subject:* Third seats and standing room on commuter rail carriages *From:* "Tim Roll-Pickering" *Date:* Sun, 5 Jul 2009 20:56:55 +0100 One of the things I've noticed when travelling on Southern or South West Trains in the commuter belt is that their carriages generally don't have any sets of three seats on one side of the aisle. By contrast the local National Express London to Shenfield service has the old layout with one side having three seats except for immediately adjacent to the vestibles or doors. London Overground services have a mix with some third seats removed, and also has some side-ways seating that creates more standing room. A consequence on the National Express services is that the trains get horrendously overcrowded, not least because it's hard to move down the carriages quickly and so passengers instead crowd in the vestible areas. Consequently these are often rampacked, with people physically forcing their way in at Stratford, whilst not every seat is used. This has led to more than one incident and I fear it won't be long before someone's badly hurt or worse. An obvious simple solution would be to remove the third seats in the carriages, thus creating wider aisles that allow more standing room and also make it easier to get out of the train in time. This could reduce some of the sardine effect, and very few more passengers would have to stand as it's rare for every seat to be taken even when there is a scrum. How do the other commuter carriages handle this? The refurbishment of the class 317/2s to create class 317/6 changed nearly all the seating from 3+2 to 2+2. I think the only exception was around the pantograph down feeds. That's not my experience of travelling between Cambridge and Liverpool in recent months. Although the 317/2s have been refurbished over the past couple of years (new seat covers and carpet, internal painting, garish pink colour scheme, removal of sliding doors around first class section) they're still 3+2 in standard. Even the ones branded as Stansted Express. PaulO |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6 July, 13:27, Paul Oter wrote:
That's not my experience of travelling between Cambridge and Liverpool ...street. PaulO |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New Holborn standing escalator trial | London Transport | |||
More on the Holborn standing escalator trial | London Transport | |||
Elderly lady has suspected stroke and is locked in a store room byStation Manager | London Transport | |||
Seats on London Overground and the new Victoria Line trains | London Transport | |||
Standing on trains | London Transport |