![]() |
Routemaster registrations
|
Routemaster registrations
On Aug 9, 2:11*pm, Bruce wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009 05:19:19 -0700 (PDT), dfarrier wrote: Nice constructive arguement, Bruce. I'll rephrase my original statement: The problem is that the centre lane on the motorway is "blocked" by lorries limited to 56mph *and modern coaches limited to 62mph. I note you corrected your error using the information I supplied in my reply. Then go to the top of the class. It still stands that in daylight hours it is not possible to drive a coach that can legally do 70mph because of its age at 70mph for economic reasons that would justify a £100,000 rebody to gain an advantage over new coaches when the middle lane is blocked by legally slower trucks and coaches. I can't make it any simpler. You could have chosen to read my original statement as: ....blocked by lorries.... (deep breath) ....and coaches that are limited to 62mph... but you chose to come in with all guns blazing. If it is car drivers holding up the middle lane at 56mph, then what speed are the lorry drivers trying to do? Why do you get a lorry in lane 1 doing 55.9 mph and one in lane 2 doing 56.0 mph and taking 4 miles to overtake? I've seen it on the M62 many times. |
Routemaster registrations
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009 07:55:01 -0700 (PDT), dfarrier
wrote: On Aug 9, 2:11*pm, Bruce wrote: On Sun, 9 Aug 2009 05:19:19 -0700 (PDT), dfarrier wrote: Nice constructive arguement, Bruce. I'll rephrase my original statement: The problem is that the centre lane on the motorway is "blocked" by lorries limited to 56mph *and modern coaches limited to 62mph. I note you corrected your error using the information I supplied in my reply. Then go to the top of the class. While you stand in the corner wearing a tall hat with a D on it. ;-) |
Routemaster registrations
On 09/08/09 09:34, Adrian wrote:
Ivor gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: It is purely a mistaken belief by operators that a Northern Irish registration disguises the age of a vehicle when it does the exact opposite and highlights its elderly state. Erm.. so my 2007 car looks older than it is purely because of its NI registration then..? Probably not, but it almost certainly looks far chavvier than it could. Congratulations, you've just managed to alienate the entire vehicle-owning population of Northern Ireland. I was talking from a mainland perspective, of course, since a Nor'n Iron plate would not provide any differentiation in NI itself. True enough I suppose, but you don't know whether I'm there or not..! (I'm not as it happens, but that's not the point). Personally, I've never understood why plates in the UK have to show the year of issue anyway. Most other countries don't seem to think it necessary. And why change *twice* a year..? I've always been an advocate of the US system of registrations - you can have whatever you like as long as it isn't obscene and someone else hasn't already got it. Also none of this silly conforming to the normal standard issue format, meaning someone can't have a plate that might have (say) their initials on purely because their initials might be I or Z for example. Also in the US (and this one is particularly important for me) radio amateurs are *automatically* entitled to have their radio callsign as their number plate and *nobody else* can have it, whether or not the amateur chooses to or not, and if your callsign happens to have a 0 (zero) in it or a Q or a Z you can still have it, unlike here. Also they don't charge silly money, the typical cost of a "vanity" plate as they're called there is around $25 - $30, not the hundreds (or sometimes thousands) they rip you off for here. Ok rant over..! checks under own car for "suspect packages" A wise move ;-) Ivor |
Routemaster registrations
Ivor Jones wrote:
Personally, I've never understood why plates in the UK have to show the year of issue anyway. Most other countries don't seem to think it necessary. And why change *twice* a year..? Lobbying by the car makers, trying to stop the annual surge in car buying in August caused by the annual change. This in its turn was due to lobbying by the car maufacturers in the 1950s, who wanted to increase sales by making it painfully obvious that your current car was *far* too old to be fashionable. France, Germany, Holland and Belgium, to name just a few, have plates that relate to the owner, not the car, so when you buy a new car, you keep the plate, while the new owner puts his plates on. We're one of very few countries that keep the plate with the vehicle for the life of the vehicle. -- Tciao for now! John. |
Routemaster registrations
In message , at 17:38:39 on Sun, 9
Aug 2009, Ivor Jones remarked: Personally, I've never understood why plates in the UK have to show the year of issue anyway. It was a way of supporting the car industry, by making it obvious how old people's cars were, so they felt more obliged to buy a new one. And they chose August to change because that's otherwise the quietest month of the year for sales. In the USA the car makers have a similar scheme, which they implement by making visible annual changes to the look of the car. -- Roland Perry |
Routemaster registrations
John Williamson gurgled happily, sounding
much like they were saying: France, Germany, Holland and Belgium, to name just a few, have plates that relate to the owner, not the car Belgium does. France most certainly does not. I'm fairly certain Germany and Holland don't, but wouldn't swear to it. |
Routemaster registrations
Adrian wrote:
John Williamson gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: France, Germany, Holland and Belgium, to name just a few, have plates that relate to the owner, not the car Belgium does. France most certainly does not. I'm fairly certain Germany and Holland don't, but wouldn't swear to it. Germany does, with the plates being removed when the vehicle is sold, and according to a Dutchman I knew, Holland does, too. The French plate, last time I checked, relates to where the owner lives, and does not follow the vehicle. If the owner moves home to a different Département, then new plates are necessary within a short period of moving. Shrug -- Tciao for Now! JOhn. |
Routemaster registrations
John Williamson gurgled happily, sounding
much like they were saying: France, Germany, Holland and Belgium, to name just a few, have plates that relate to the owner, not the car Belgium does. France most certainly does not. I'm fairly certain Germany and Holland don't, but wouldn't swear to it. Germany does, with the plates being removed when the vehicle is sold, Yes, but they can't legally be swapped between vehicles in the same way as Belgian ones are. The French plate, last time I checked, relates to where the owner lives, and does not follow the vehicle. If the owner moves home to a different Département, then new plates are necessary within a short period of moving. Indeed. But if the car stays within the same dept, the same plate stays on it. Anyway, they've changed that completely as of this January, and have moved to a single national registration scheme with cars wearing the same plate "for life". |
Routemaster registrations
On 10 Aug 2009 06:21:50 GMT, Adrian wrote:
John Williamson gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: The French plate, last time I checked, relates to where the owner lives, and does not follow the vehicle. If the owner moves home to a different Département, then new plates are necessary within a short period of moving. Indeed. But if the car stays within the same dept, the same plate stays on it. Anyway, they've changed that completely as of this January, and have moved to a single national registration scheme with cars wearing the same plate "for life". Is the plate still in the same format, though, with the Département number still being shown? Or is it a completely new system? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk