![]() |
Walk-through trains
Sorry - not sure exactly what they're called, but why is it only the SSL
and Overground that are to get trains that you can walk all the way through (like a bendy bus)? Is there something on the Tube lines that stops this design being practical? Also, are the 172s going to be like the 378s or the more 'conventional' design like on other BR trains? |
Walk-through trains
On Aug 11, 1:18*pm, Commuter wrote:
Sorry - not sure exactly what they're called, but why is it only the SSL and Overground that are to get trains that you can walk all the way through (like a bendy bus)? Is there something on the Tube lines that stops this design being practical? Bouncyness and sharp curves, AIUI. Also, are the 172s going to be like the 378s or the more 'conventional' design like on other BR trains? Definitely conventional carriages and conventional-ish seating, although I'm assuming it'll be wide-aisle 2x2 like the SWT 455s. Remember, the aim among all involved is for the 172s not to stay in LO's hands for very long. -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
Walk-through trains
In message , at 13:18:32 on Tue, 11 Aug
2009, Commuter remarked: Sorry - not sure exactly what they're called, but why is it only the SSL and Overground that are to get trains that you can walk all the way through (like a bendy bus)? I thought there were plans for such trains in the Underground (the ex-Metrolink contract). -- Roland Perry |
Walk-through trains
"Roland Perry" wrote in message
In message , at 13:18:32 on Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Commuter remarked: Sorry - not sure exactly what they're called, but why is it only the SSL and Overground that are to get trains that you can walk all the way through (like a bendy bus)? I thought there were plans for such trains in the Underground (the ex-Metrolink contract). I think the 2009 Victoria line trains are the only tube trains ordered by Metronet. |
Walk-through trains
In message , at 14:42:18 on
Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Recliner remarked: Sorry - not sure exactly what they're called, but why is it only the SSL and Overground that are to get trains that you can walk all the way through (like a bendy bus)? I thought there were plans for such trains in the Underground (the ex-Metrolink contract). I think the 2009 Victoria line trains are the only tube trains ordered by Metronet. There originally seemed to be bigger plans, for more new trains. -- Roland Perry |
Walk-through trains
"Roland Perry" wrote in message
In message , at 14:42:18 on Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Recliner remarked: Sorry - not sure exactly what they're called, but why is it only the SSL and Overground that are to get trains that you can walk all the way through (like a bendy bus)? I thought there were plans for such trains in the Underground (the ex-Metrolink contract). I think the 2009 Victoria line trains are the only tube trains ordered by Metronet. There originally seemed to be bigger plans, for more new trains. Not that I can recall. The Bakerloo is the only other Metronet line with old trains, but they're not due for replacement for a few years yet. Had Metronet remained in its original form, I'm sure these would just have been follow-ons from the Bombardier 2009 stock (rather like the Met-Cam 1972 stock was based on the 1967 TS), but TfL is much more likely to put it out to tender. I assume Tube Lines will also put the Piccadilly replacement stock out to tender, but not just yet -- perhaps the 1972 and 1973 replacements will be a single new stock, much as the S stock replaces the A, C and D stocks. Conceivably, Bombardier could win both those contracts as well, but Alston, for one, is likely to be keen to bid. As mentioned upthread, for reasons of tight space and twisty track, I think it highly unlikely that any LU tube stock will have walk-through inter-car connections. After all, just think how narrow and low the doorways would have to be! |
Walk-through trains
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:38:45 +0100
"Recliner" wrote: Not that I can recall. The Bakerloo is the only other Metronet line with old trains, but they're not due for replacement for a few years yet. Had Metronet remained in its original form, I'm sure these would just have been follow-ons from the Bombardier 2009 stock (rather like the Met-Cam 1972 stock was based on the 1967 TS), but TfL is much more likely to put it out to tender. Is it really to much to ask for LUL to stick with a common design to save on the cost of a new one as opposed to just adding extra orders onto the book? Not to mention being able to spread staff maintenance expertise over more than 1 line, saving on the cost of spares etc. While train builders seem to like to pretend they're designing the space shuttles replacement there really hasn't been any large scale new tech in trains for the last 10 years so why bother with yet another design? As mentioned upthread, for reasons of tight space and twisty track, I think it highly unlikely that any LU tube stock will have walk-through inter-car connections. After all, just think how narrow and low the doorways would have to be! Doesn't seem to be a problem for people in bendy buses when they go around corners. B2003 |
Walk-through trains
On 11 Aug, 15:38, "Recliner" wrote:
"Roland Perry" wrote in message In message , at 14:42:18 on Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Recliner remarked: Sorry - not sure exactly what they're called, but why is it only the SSL and Overground that are to get trains that you can walk all the way through (like a bendy bus)? I thought there were plans for such trains in the Underground (the ex-Metrolink contract). I think the 2009 Victoria line trains are the only tube trains ordered by Metronet. There originally seemed to be bigger plans, for more new trains. Not that I can recall. The Bakerloo is the only other Metronet line with old trains, but they're not due for replacement for a few years yet. Had Metronet remained in its original form, I'm sure these would just have been follow-ons from the Bombardier 2009 stock (rather like the Met-Cam 1972 stock was based on the 1967 TS), but TfL is much more likely to put it out to tender. I assume Tube Lines will also put the Piccadilly replacement stock out to tender, but not just yet -- perhaps the 1972 and 1973 replacements will be a single new stock, much as the S stock replaces the A, C and D stocks. Conceivably, Bombardier could win both those contracts as well, but Alston, for one, is likely to be keen to bid. As mentioned upthread, for reasons of tight space and twisty track, I think it highly unlikely that any LU tube stock will have walk-through inter-car connections. *After all, just think how narrow and low the doorways would have to be! I wouldn't be surprised if the 1967 stock was in a better condition than 1972 stock anyway, not having been subjected to the bends, bounce and manual driving of the bakerloo. I wonder if some will cascaded, or maybe it doesn't have the full manual driving equipment? |
Walk-through trains
In message , at 15:38:45 on
Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Recliner remarked: "Roland Perry" wrote in message In message , at 14:42:18 on Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Recliner remarked: Sorry - not sure exactly what they're called, but why is it only the SSL and Overground that are to get trains that you can walk all the way through (like a bendy bus)? I thought there were plans for such trains in the Underground (the ex-Metrolink contract). I think the 2009 Victoria line trains are the only tube trains ordered by Metronet. There originally seemed to be bigger plans, for more new trains. Not that I can recall. The Bakerloo is the only other Metronet line with old trains, but they're not due for replacement for a few years yet. Had Metronet remained in its original form, I'm sure these would just have been follow-ons from the Bombardier 2009 stock (rather like the Met-Cam 1972 stock was based on the 1967 TS), but TfL is much more likely to put it out to tender. I assume Tube Lines will also put the Piccadilly replacement stock out to tender, but not just yet -- perhaps the 1972 and 1973 replacements will be a single new stock, much as the S stock replaces the A, C and D stocks. Conceivably, Bombardier could win both those contracts as well, but Alston, for one, is likely to be keen to bid. As mentioned upthread, for reasons of tight space and twisty track, I think it highly unlikely that any LU tube stock will have walk-through inter-car connections. After all, just think how narrow and low the doorways would have to be! "Since Metronet's collapse London Underground claims to have saved £2.5bn through the renegotiation of contracts, revising the upgrade programme, better procurement and operational efficiencies. This new work will be complemented by a fleet of 191 new air-conditioned walk through trains. It will mean passengers will experience a more reliable service, with 50% greater capacity." http://www.contractjournal.com/Artic.../70166/london- underground-re-tenders-mammoth-metronet-signalling-job.html Or are those SSL? -- Roland Perry |
Walk-through trains
On 11 Aug, 15:59, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 15:38:45 on Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Recliner remarked: "Roland Perry" wrote in message In message , at 14:42:18 on Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Recliner remarked: Sorry - not sure exactly what they're called, but why is it only the SSL and Overground that are to get trains that you can walk all the way through (like a bendy bus)? I thought there were plans for such trains in the Underground (the ex-Metrolink contract). I think the 2009 Victoria line trains are the only tube trains ordered by Metronet. There originally seemed to be bigger plans, for more new trains. Not that I can recall. The Bakerloo is the only other Metronet line with old trains, but they're not due for replacement for a few years yet. Had Metronet remained in its original form, I'm sure these would just have been follow-ons from the Bombardier 2009 stock (rather like the Met-Cam 1972 stock was based on the 1967 TS), but TfL is much more likely to put it out to tender. I assume Tube Lines will also put the Piccadilly replacement stock out to tender, but not just yet -- perhaps the 1972 and 1973 replacements will be a single new stock, much as the S stock replaces the A, C and D stocks. Conceivably, Bombardier could win both those contracts as well, but Alston, for one, is likely to be keen to bid. As mentioned upthread, for reasons of tight space and twisty track, I think it highly unlikely that any LU tube stock will have walk-through inter-car connections. *After all, just think how narrow and low the doorways would have to be! * * * * "Since Metronet's collapse London Underground claims to have * * * * saved £2.5bn through the renegotiation of contracts, revising * * * * the upgrade programme, better procurement and operational * * * * efficiencies. This new work will be complemented by a fleet of * * * * 191 new air-conditioned walk through trains. It will mean * * * * passengers will experience a more reliable service, with 50% * * * * greater capacity." http://www.contractjournal.com/Artic.../70166/london- underground-re-tenders-mammoth-metronet-signalling-job.html Or are those SSL? Bound to be. There's no plans to air-condition anything tube-sized either, is there? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk