![]() |
Former bridge in City Road, London
http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?hl=en&....36 ,,1,11.01 At the point where the road used to go over the canal basin, the road still has a lengthy bump, but the pavements are banked up a foot or two higher at the centre. I can't see any reason why the pavements would have been banked up over the road when the canal basin still stretched under the road. It looks as if the road used to be higher than now, but I can't imagine that it would be possible to lower a road on a bridge while leaving the bridge intact. So the part of the bridge carrying the road was demolished and the gap beneath it filled in with earth, and the road reinstated at a lower level.... the parts of the bridge carrying the pavements were left intact, and still carry the pavement some way over the lowered road. But that seems bizarre too.... surely if you're going to demolish the road part of the bridge, you'd demolish the pavement parts too. |
Former bridge in City Road, London
In message , Basil Jet
writes At the point where the road used to go over the canal basin, the road still has a lengthy bump, but the pavements are banked up a foot or two higher at the centre. At a guess, there are utilities running under the pavement that were too expensive to move - sewer pipes and the like. In fact, when the canal basin was part filled-in in the 1980s, a large electricity substation was built adjacent to the bridge. Islington have a masterplan for redeveloping the area, which mentions the difficulties caused by high-voltage cables (protected by a grid of pre-cast concrete) in the immediate locality of the bridge. These include "branches feeding a network of cable routes running below City Road". -- Paul Terry |
Former bridge in City Road, London
Paul Terry wrote:
In message , Basil Jet writes At the point where the road used to go over the canal basin, the road still has a lengthy bump, but the pavements are banked up a foot or two higher at the centre. At a guess, there are utilities running under the pavement that were too expensive to move - sewer pipes and the like. Thanks - I always forget the utilities. Speaking of utilities, I just found this attractively designed site about the drains of Toronto. "Angels Of The Underground" http://www.aotu.ca/index2.html Back to our Angel of the Underground, does anyone know the purpose of the octagonal building bearing LU signs at the junction of Goswell Road and City Road, and when it was built? http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?hl=en&...77. 56,,1,0.8. |
Former bridge in City Road, London
In message , Basil Jet
writes Back to our Angel of the Underground, does anyone know the purpose of the octagonal building bearing LU signs at the junction of Goswell Road and City Road, and when it was built? I'm pretty sure it's the surface exit from the emergency stairs at Angel station, constructed in 1992 when the station was rebuilt with separate platforms instead of the former narrow island platform. It's close to the old station entrance, which was almost opposite. -- Paul Terry |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk