![]() |
Crossrail tunnels
Hi all,
On http://www.crossrail.co.uk , the posters which appear at the consultation are downloadable as PDFs. In one of them (Central London Stations) most of the physical obstructions that Crossrail has to avoid are marked. Between Liverpool Street and Whitechapel there are two tunnels marked "Services" and one marked "Obs." Sice they are all about 30 metres down, I'd be fascinated to know what they are. Presumably Obs stands for obsolete? (The Post Office Tube, although obsolete, is elsewhere.) -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
Crossrail tunnels
In message , John Rowland
writes On http://www.crossrail.co.uk , the posters which appear at the consultation are downloadable as PDFs. In one of them (Central London Stations) most of the physical obstructions that Crossrail has to avoid are marked. Between Liverpool Street and Whitechapel there are two tunnels marked "Services" and one marked "Obs." Sice they are all about 30 metres down, I'd be fascinated to know what they are. Presumably Obs stands for obsolete? (The Post Office Tube, although obsolete, is elsewhere.) Just a guess, but could it be one of the tunnels built by Halcrow for the GPO telecommunications network in the 1950s? The original system was 8 miles long and involved seriously big tunnels (16.5 foot diameter) at deep level. According to "London Under London" one of these runs east via the Moorgate exchange to the Houndsditch Exchange close to Liverpool Street, then NE to Bishopsgate and Bethnal Green - so CrossRail would need to cross it at some point. I don't know that these tunnels are technically obsolete, but it could well be that in the digital age cables have been re-routed so there is no need to keep up the costly maintenance of tunnelling on that sort of scale. In any case, their original purpose (to maintain communications after nuclear attack) was never properly thought through, and is now somewhat redundant. -- Paul Terry |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk