Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 14:33:56 +0000 (UTC), wrote:
Quite. Even the Tories at their worst wouldn't have released a mass murdering terrorist after 8 years just to gain favour with a corrupt dictator for some trade. And no , I don't believe the SNP acted alone on this. If you believe Labour would come to some secret deal with the SNP then you don't know the first thing about Scottish politics. |
#43
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#44
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:27:33 +0100
Tom Barry wrote: ....in any of which he would have been acting in the capacity of a state operative of a one party state run by our mate Gaddafi. Anyway, it's immaterial - the conviction was highly unsound. Really? Care to fill us in with your profound insights as to why this is so? As the man said, no one comes out of this well. Except the SNP, whose dedication to principles of compassion regardless of the PR consequences does them credit. The rest of them can get ****ed, particularly if they LOL! The only thing the SNP came out of it looking like is a bunch of pathetic limp wristed halfwits under the thumb of westminster who want libya's assets. "Compassion" - the important keyword for wet feminised guardianistas everywhere. B2003 |
#45
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:30:04 +0100
JNugent wrote: Recliner wrote: wrote in message On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 08:31:11 -0700 (PDT) MIG wrote: No one has a good record on Libya, and that patsy's release was just a Yeah , obviously a patsy. All the evidence was faked and the trial was a showtrial. The conspiracy theorists have spoken so it must be true. Just because the attack couldn't have been done by 1 man alone doesn't mean he wasn't involved. Almost certainly, he wasn't (at least in this case). As a Libyan intelligence officer, he may well have been involved in other terrorist attacks, of course. Is he still alive, does anyone know? Of course he is. Only idiots (ie the SNP) believed that about-to-die BS. Him and Ronnie Biggs will probably be able to have a release party together next year some time as their release anniversaries come up. B2003 |
#46
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 01:50:29 +0100
wrote: On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 14:33:56 +0000 (UTC), wrote: Quite. Even the Tories at their worst wouldn't have released a mass murdering terrorist after 8 years just to gain favour with a corrupt dictator for some trade. And no , I don't believe the SNP acted alone on this. If you believe Labour would come to some secret deal with the SNP then you don't know the first thing about Scottish politics. Well for a start "Scottish politics" is an oxymoron. That glorified county council up in edinburgh would have trouble running a tap on its own without outside help. And when westminster waves the threat of yet another funding cut of half a billion under their noses they'll do what they're told. B2003 |
#47
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#48
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#49
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6 Oct, 09:42, wrote:
On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:27:33 +0100 Tom Barry wrote: ....in any of which he would have been acting in the capacity of a state operative of a one party state run by our mate Gaddafi. *Anyway, it's immaterial - the conviction was highly unsound. Really? Care to fill us in with your profound insights as to why this is so? You first, let's hear your profound insight as to why it's otherwise. -- Halmyre We're gonna need a bigger sigfile... |
#50
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 02:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
Halmyre wrote: On 6 Oct, 09:42, wrote: On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:27:33 +0100 Tom Barry wrote: ....in any of which he would have been acting in the capacity of a state operative of a one party state run by our mate Gaddafi. =A0Anyway, it's immaterial - the conviction was highly unsound. Really? Care to fill us in with your profound insights as to why this is = so? You first, let's hear your profound insight as to why it's otherwise. He was convicted in a court of law. So unless you think the notoriously lefty judiciary was somehow persuaded to bow to american pressure I can't see an issue with it. Still, don't take my word for it - read the original evidence: http://blogs.findlaw.com/courtside/2...y-verdict.html B2003 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Updating "Digital Dave/Doris" | London Transport | |||
Ping Dave Arquati | London Transport | |||
Is Dave unwell? | London Transport | |||
Nice peice of meet | London Transport |