Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#101
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Neil Williams" wrote in message ... And people who board the wrong train aren't going to say "fair cop, here's 20 quid". They're going to explain what has happened and hope they get away with it. Indeed. I don't know about PF areas, but MX is that usually people who boarded the wrong train are sent back from whence they came and told to explain what happened to anyone that asks, not charged an extra fare, Penalty or otherwise. That would seem the reasonable action. |
#102
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 18:21:44 on Tue, 27 Oct
2009, Buddenbrooks remarked: http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/crime/ps/s...laidcrime?page =6 This gives me page not found, even after correcting the wrap http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/crime/pers...ersec/multileg alaidcrime?page=6 -- Roland Perry |
#103
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roland Perry" wrote in message ... And despite the nonsense about "contracts" spouted by Mr B, if they are told that all they can do is pay the "full single fare" (which is in the region of £65 for Leicester-London) a refusal will eventually end them in court. On what charge? Give me a reference for it ever happening. |
#104
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 06:18:51 on Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Buddenbrooks remarked: Similarly there will not be a law just saying 'It is an offence to board a train without a valid ticket' You probably need to read the relevant Transport Act. I have and any court action will be under the Railways Act 1889, penalty fines are under the Railways (Penalty Fares) Regulations 1994 and, The Railways Act 1993 and Transport Act 2000. The modern acts make it legal for the companies to fine a passenger, but the fine cannot be enforced. In which case a prosecution can proceed under the 1889 act. The only enforcement the rail company may do is demand a valid name and address and should they have reasonable grounds to believe the information is false they may detain the individual pending a member of the Transport Police. A prosecution under the 1889 act requires proof that the passenger intended to travel without paying, not having a ticket is insufficient where it is possible to purchase a ticket from the conductor and have means to pay. The following is one of the clauses defing an offence under the 1889 act: travelling/attempting to travel on a railway without having previously paid the fare and with intent to avoid payment thereof; Note the key word 'intent' |
#105
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Mason" wrote in message t... In article , http://tinyurl.com/forlazyroland I can now see the page, but cannot see anything on fare evasion |
#106
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Biddulph" groups [at] biddulph.org.uk wrote in message ... Regulation of Railways Act 1889 http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content...oc Id=1061371 -- That is the relevant act and as in another post the act requires an intent to travel without a ticket. Remember that in 1889 the railways were private companies and the government would not have passed laws that allowed a private company to raise their 'terms and conditions' to the same level as acts of parliament. Obviously acts after post war nationalization and before privatization would have treated BR as an arm of the government. A difference might be: I worked for a branch of the government at one time and the rules were that I could be searched on leaving the site, I could be searched on leaving the site. I now work for a private company and the terms and conditions of my employment say I can be searched on leaving the site. I can be sacked for not allowing a search, they cannot force a search. |
#107
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:13:04 +0000, Roland Perry
wrote: I've never heard that offered as an option for people caught on the "wrong train" or with an "accidentally invalid"[1] ticket on an 'intercity' train. Depends if you mean wrong time, or entirely wrong train (one that, for instance, does not stop at the required destination). I've seen a few cases of the latter, and in no case was any fare charged. No, it's "pay up or else". And iirc the PF is only £20 if the proper fare is £20, otherwise it's the higher amount. Worse than that - it's *twice* the Anytime Single to the next stop, after which the passenger has the option to leave the train or to pay the Anytime Single fare for the rest of the journey. Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the at to reply. |
#108
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Buddenbrooks" wrote in message ... "Jim Mason" wrote in message t... In article , http://tinyurl.com/forlazyroland I can now see the page, but cannot see anything on fare evasion Click "Edit", "Find on page", Enter "Fare Evasion", Click "Find next" (or whatever you have to do with your browser) tim |
#109
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 18:30:12 on Tue, 27 Oct
2009, Buddenbrooks remarked: And despite the nonsense about "contracts" spouted by Mr B, if they are told that all they can do is pay the "full single fare" (which is in the region of £65 for Leicester-London) a refusal will eventually end them in court. On what charge? Give me a reference for it ever happening. You been given references; this getting tedious. -- Roland Perry |
#110
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 19:43:18 on Tue,
27 Oct 2009, Neil Williams remarked: I've never heard that offered as an option for people caught on the "wrong train" or with an "accidentally invalid"[1] ticket on an 'intercity' train. Depends if you mean wrong time, or entirely wrong train (one that, for instance, does not stop at the required destination). I've seen a few cases of the latter, and in no case was any fare charged. The ones I've seen most of are "accidentally invalid" tickets. Most recent, and where the chap was indeed let off with a "don't do it again" was buying a ticket with Family Railcard, then omitting to bring a child along. Passenger claimed he didn't realise this was necessary. Time before that was a lady using an Open ticket a day or to after purchase. This used to be valid, and may be again; but this was during the interval it wasn't. She left in no doubt that she was required to 'pay again', despite being quite distressed about it. Meanwhile Leicester seems to be a hot-spot for "wrong train" advance purchase tickets, to some extent because of the timetabling. There are regular platform announcements about the peril of getting on the wrong train. Although more recently the EMT train managers don't make nearly so many on-train announcements about this. -- Roland Perry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Two Heads Are Better Than One: Where Did Graham Bond Die? | London Transport | |||
Heads up - Eurostar on Radio 2 | London Transport | |||
Monday 7th July: Panorama on Heathrow | London Transport | |||
In Search Of Style on London Transport: ITV1 London, Thursday, 7:30pm to 8pm | London Transport | |||
On NOW: BBC1 | London Transport |