![]() |
Central line outer reaches
I was reading in the Evening Standard that on top of the increased prices
from January 2010 they are also reducing off peak services. Does anyone have anymore details of reduced off peak services? |
Central line outer reaches
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:49:22 +0100, Paul Corfield wrote:
I was reading in the Evening Standard that on top of the increased prices from January 2010 they are also reducing off peak services. Does anyone have anymore details of reduced off peak services? No - nothing has been determined. If you read the press release it says "and some limited bus service reductions, and minor reductions in service on a few sections of the Tube, to reflect changes in passenger demand." Note that this does not refer to off peak services as you have mentioned in your post. It says where there have been "changes in demand". That does not even mean demand has to have fallen in order for there to be a change. This is all very carefully worded if you work through it slowly. It should also be borne in mind that it will be difficult to make too many cuts to the outer reaches as depots are often at the ends of lines (e.g Ruislip and Hainault on the Central). How does that work? I don't see how e.g. the presence of the depot at Ruislip prevents some daytime services being cut back from West Ruislip to White City - the trains just reverse in the platform without going into the depot. Incidentally it might be worth mentioning the cuts in Amersham services which have already been announced. What is also quite fascinating is the remark that "future bus enhancements will only proceed if efficiencies are achieved to cover the cost" (or words to that effect). I wonder how efficiencies are going to be created in order to fund each bendy bus conversion? The statement only applies to enhancements... ;-) Oh and don't forget to spot the interesting "all future fares increases will be based on RPI+2% although the Mayor has the final say" comment. I'm pretty sure this is an increase on the old RPI+1% formula that applied in London but happy to be corrected. I guess it's just expectation management - they're telling us their working assumption is that they're going to screw us every year, so we might as well get used to it. Plus it allows the mayor to claim credit if he shafts us with a real-terms increase of "only" 1.5%. |
Central line outer reaches
Paul Corfield wrote:
What is also quite fascinating is the remark that "future bus enhancements will only proceed if efficiencies are achieved to cover the cost" (or words to that effect). I wonder how efficiencies are going to be created in order to fund each bendy bus conversion? More bus lanes, allowing higher frequency for the same cost? |
Central line outer reaches
On 16 Oct, 23:59, asdf wrote:
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:49:22 +0100, Paul Corfield wrote: I was reading in the Evening Standard that on top of the increased prices from January 2010 they are also reducing off peak services. Does anyone have anymore details of reduced off peak services? No - nothing has been determined. If you read the press release it says "and some limited bus service reductions, and minor reductions in service on a few sections of the Tube, to reflect changes in passenger demand." Note that this does not refer to off peak services as you have mentioned in your post. It says where there have been "changes in demand". That does not even mean demand has to have fallen in order for there to be a change. This is all very carefully worded if you work through it slowly. It should also be borne in mind that it will be difficult to make too many cuts to the outer reaches as depots are often at the ends of lines (e.g Ruislip and Hainault on the Central). How does that work? I don't see how e.g. the presence of the depot at Ruislip prevents some daytime services being cut back from West Ruislip to White City - the trains just reverse in the platform without going into the depot. Presumably it's more to do with driver depots (or the places where drivers can hang their stuff and start and finish work) which may largely be the same places as train depots? I wouldn't be at all surprised to see some services cut back to Loughton at that end, which would fit in with where depots are anyway. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk