![]() |
|
Lord Adonis announces tram-trains for the Abbey Line
Bonsoir!
D7666 wrote: It is about the 42nd time I've mentioned Avanto in various thread in this forum over recent years, yet every new thread about tram/trains trots out the same uninformed drivel about perceived 25 kV / 750 V trams not exisitng, need to re-wire 25 kV to 750 V etc, when they do exist and are well proven. There are even electro-diesel options although not sure if any of those have actually been built yet. You can go to Alstom, last type on the following page: http://www.railfaneurope.net/list/ge...rmany_rbk.html Cheers, Johannes. |
Lord Adonis announces tram-trains for the Abbey Line
"Arthur Figgis" wrote in message o.uk... Tom Anderson wrote: Does it really make sense to have a dedicated maintenance facility just for this one tram? Given that a passing loop is apparently one of the main reasons for the project, I suspect there may be more than one tram :) -- Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK Sorry what project. Watford needs another expensive talking shop like a hole in the head. Kevin |
Lord Adonis announces tram-trains for the Abbey Line
"Tom Anderson" wrote in message rth.li... On Sun, 8 Nov 2009, Peter Masson wrote: "Tom Anderson" wrote Does it really make sense to have a dedicated maintenance facility just for this one tram? Or when we say 'depot', do we mean 'somewhere to sleep at night plus somewhere for light maintenance eg changing the light bulbs', with heavy work being done at an existing major depot reached by rail or low-loader? We have the precedent of the Stourbridge PPMs, which have their own little shed at the Junction. For that matter, Waterloo (W&C) manages all the maintenance for the W&C trains, except when, after around 15 years, they had to be craned out and taken away for overhaul. And Ryde shed copes with maintaining the 70-year-old Island Line stock. Waterloo and Ryde lack rail connections - or easy low-loader access - to the rest of the network, so there, sending trains away for regular work would be exorbitantly expensive, hence having their own little heavy workshops makes sense. I'm afraid i'm not familiar with Stourbridge, its trains, or its acronyms. Although on googling, i find this is one of those clever Parry People Mover things. My questions there are (a) is all maintenance handled at the local depot, or do they ever go elsewhere, They seem to go back to Parry for warranty "adjustments", but AIUI refuelling and minor servicing do occur at their little shed. (b) are the vehicles so different to normal trains that there would be no cost saving in co-locating their workshop with a normal train depot Probably, more to the point, as the cars do not conform AIUI to railway vehicle standards, they cannot be operated as a normal working over the network. Access to the mainline is indirect. The design of several aspects of the vehicles, especially the electrics, was changed to conform to rail industry practice rather than bus industry practice - so that attention could be given if needed at rail depots. and (c) is this at all an artifact of this being a bit of an experimental pilot scheme? In part, yes. tom -- KEEP CALM and CARRY ON DW downunder |
Lord Adonis announces tram-trains for the Abbey Line
Consultation on the Abbey Line tram-trains has now started.
Details at :- http://www.dft.gov.uk/consultations/open/2010-05/ Burkey |
Lord Adonis announces tram-trains for the Abbey Line
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 20:57:40 GMT, "Peter Lawrence"
wrote: On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 12:32:06 -0800 (PST), burkey wrote: Consultation on the Abbey Line tram-trains has now started. Details at :- http://www.dft.gov.uk/consultations/open/2010-05/ Thanks. However my computer tells me the consultation pdf is damaged. Has anyone else met this problem? No, it worked fine for me. I use Adobe Reader 9.1.0. |
Lord Adonis announces tram-trains for the Abbey Line
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 12:32:06 -0800 (PST), burkey
wrote: Consultation on the Abbey Line tram-trains has now started. Details at :- http://www.dft.gov.uk/consultations/open/2010-05/ Thanks. However my computer tells me the consultation pdf is damaged. Has anyone else met this problem? -- Peter Lawrence |
Lord Adonis announces tram-trains for the Abbey Line
On 7 Jan, 20:57, "Peter Lawrence" wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 12:32:06 -0800 (PST), burkey wrote: Consultation on the Abbey Line tram-trains has now started. Details at :-http://www.dft.gov.uk/consultations/open/2010-05/ Thanks. *However my computer tells me the consultation pdf is damaged. Has anyone else met this problem? Mine tells me it's in a newer version that may not display correctly (although it looks fine at a glance). I think by default it's using Acrobat 7.0 rather than the latest Acrobat Reader. Could probably save it and get the latest reader and open it from that, if necessary. |
Lord Adonis announces tram-trains for the Abbey Line
On Jan 4, 8:32*pm, burkey wrote:
Consultation on the Abbey Line tram-trains has now started. Details at :-http://www.dft.gov.uk/consultations/open/2010-05/ Excellent. I shall be pressing for Bistrotrams at the earliest opportunity. http://www.rheinbahn.de/SiteCollecti...tro2_klein.jpg |
Lord Adonis announces tram-trains for the Abbey Line
On 31 Oct 2009, 03:45, "DW downunder" noname wrote:
7) extensions would of course be on County Councillors' minds, subject as always to business case and expenditure priorities. DW down under What about a diveunder under the mainline at watford junction, and then taking over the disused rickmansworth branch, and thence to chalfont & latimer - to take over the chesham branch of the met? |
Lord Adonis announces tram-trains for the Abbey Line
"lonelytraveller" wrote in message ... On 31 Oct 2009, 03:45, "DW downunder" noname wrote: 7) extensions would of course be on County Councillors' minds, subject as always to business case and expenditure priorities. DW down under What about a diveunder under the mainline at watford junction, and then taking over the disused rickmansworth branch, and thence to chalfont & latimer - to take over the chesham branch of the met? Been threaded at ukr already. Answer - cost. DW |
Lord Adonis announces tram-trains for the Abbey Line
lonelytraveller wrote:
What about a diveunder under the mainline at watford junction, and then taking over the disused rickmansworth branch, and thence to chalfont & latimer - to take over the chesham branch of the met? Why on earth do that? It's a tram - it doesn't have the same constraints on gradient and curvature as a train. If you're going to extend it in what is largely countryside, you can put it pretty much anywhere, and former railway alignments are not much more useful than anywhere else. Extending the other end to Redbourn, Luton Airport Parkway and Luton Airport Terminal is the same distance as your proposal, probably cheaper and about a million times more useful. -- We are the Strasbourg. Referendum is futile. |
Lord Adonis announces tram-trains for the Abbey Line
On 8 Jan, 02:08, "Basil Jet"
wrote: lonelytraveller wrote: What about a diveunder under the mainline at watford junction, and then taking over the disused rickmansworth branch, and thence to chalfont & latimer - to take over the chesham branch of the met? Why on earth do that? It's a tram - it doesn't have the same constraints on gradient and curvature as a train. If you're going to extend it in what is largely countryside, you can put it pretty much anywhere, and former railway alignments are not much more useful than anywhere else. Extending the other end to Redbourn, Luton Airport Parkway and Luton Airport Terminal is the same distance as your proposal, probably cheaper and about a million times more useful. -- We are the Strasbourg. Referendum is futile. I'd argue that extending to Hatfield Station via the Galleria would be more useful than Luton. I don't like the idea of on-street extensions though. The line is too important as a part of a potential orbital route. Slow all-stops tram services will make end-to-end journey times far too long. By all means run trams on it /now/ to build up ridership to the point building up the infrastructure can be justified, but the end state needs to be the return of heavy rail catering to end-to-end fast services. I do wish there was a handy old flyunder already south of WJ though. |
Lord Adonis announces tram-trains for the Abbey Line
"lonelytraveller" wrote [snip] What about a diveunder under the mainline at watford junction, and then taking over the disused rickmansworth branch, and thence to chalfont & latimer - to take over the chesham branch of the met? There isn't any disused Rickmansworth branch any more. All there are nowadays is two routes very much NOT disused, the canal towpath, and the Ebury Way. You would be about equally unpopular trying to take over either one. By far the most popular project that the National Lottery's Millennium Fund ever financed was the National Cycle Network. If you try to destroy it, you will not be popular. Jeremy Parker |
Lord Adonis announces tram-trains for the Abbey Line
On Jan 8, 7:57*pm, "Jeremy Parker"
wrote: "lonelytraveller" wrote [snip] What about a diveunder under the mainline at watford junction, and then taking over the disused rickmansworth branch, and thence to chalfont & latimer - to take over the chesham branch of the met? There isn't any disused Rickmansworth branch any more. *All there are nowadays is two routes very much NOT disused, the canal towpath, and the Ebury Way. *You would be about equally unpopular trying to take over either one. By far the most popular project that the National Lottery's Millennium Fund *ever financed was the National Cycle Network. *If you try to destroy it, you will not be popular. Jeremy Parker Quite. I figured more along the lines of using spare capacity on the Watford branch of the Met myself. |
Lord Adonis announces tram-trains for the Abbey Line
"EE507" wrote in message ... On Jan 4, 8:32 pm, burkey wrote: Consultation on the Abbey Line tram-trains has now started. Details at :-http://www.dft.gov.uk/consultations/open/2010-05/ Excellent. I shall be pressing for Bistrotrams at the earliest opportunity. http://www.rheinbahn.de/SiteCollecti...tro2_klein.jpg Something similar would be a good thing, between Gosport and Fareham. Oh, wait...... |
Lord Adonis announces tram-trains for the Abbey Line
In message
"Ian" wrote: "EE507" wrote in message ... On Jan 4, 8:32 pm, burkey wrote: Consultation on the Abbey Line tram-trains has now started. Details at :-http://www.dft.gov.uk/consultations/open/2010-05/ Excellent. I shall be pressing for Bistrotrams at the earliest opportunity. Why do I keep reading that as Bistotrams? insert comments about gravy trains here -- Graeme Wall This address not read, substitute trains for rail Transport Miscellany at www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail Photo galleries at http://graeme-wall.fotopic.net/ |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:57 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk