Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#51
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11 Nov, 16:35, "Paul Scott" wrote:
"David Cantrell" wrote in message k... On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 08:23:23AM -0800, Mr Thant wrote: Here's the map at KXSP: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mjs/4089297930/ That's quite confusing - it looks like there are two seperate yellow lines. Personally, I always think that type of diagram should be the other way up, ie 'you are here' should be at the bottom, with progress along the line upwards. Does anyone else agree? Well, the only arrow one can see in the picture is pointing upwards, actually. I wonder what the previous one was like? |
#52
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:15:57 +0000, asdf
wrote: But there won't be a frequency increase in the Kings Cross to Paddington direction - there will actually be a slight frequency decrease. Though there may well be the impression of one, as the Circle Line at the moment is so badly bunched by the end of the day that you can easily end up with 3 trains within 10 minutes then a 25 minute gap. Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the at to reply. |
#53
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11 Nov, 19:54, MIG wrote:
Well, the only arrow one can see in the picture is pointing upwards, actually. I wonder what the previous one was like? Like this: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mackenzieblu/2002707620/ U |
#54
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11 Nov, 20:20, Mr Thant
wrote: On 11 Nov, 19:54, MIG wrote: Well, the only arrow one can see in the picture is pointing upwards, actually. I wonder what the previous one was like? Like this:http://www.flickr.com/photos/mackenzieblu/2002707620/ U Hmm. So the convention seems to be going down from the top. I honestly wouldn't have been sure without checking. |
#56
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
(solar penguin) wrote: David Cantrell wrote: On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 06:02:31PM -0600, wrote: This would also appear to be because the Journey Planner thinks there will still be a Circle Line service from king's Cross to High St Kensington on 14 December! Bloody useless! There will be. It'll just take a long time, going the wrong way roudn the circle. Or going via Hammersmith. No effing use for users of the Wimbledon branch! -- Colin Rosenstiel |
#57
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#58
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:24:19 +0000, Basil Jet wrote:
wrote: That won't be possible after 13 December. There will be no guaranteed step-free route from Earl's Court to King's Cross. Yes there will - the Circles will all terminate alongside the Barkingbound platform, and the Wimblewares will all terminate alongside the Hammersmithbound platform. (Or was it the other way around?) Is that guaranteed? If trains arrive out of sequence (e.g., a Wimbleware was running late at Earl's Court so a Circle snuck ahead of it into High St Kensington), will the second Circle really wait for the first one to depart (thereby holding up the trains behind it as well) rather than simply taking the available track? And then the two back-to-back Wimblewares would have a similar problem. (It pretty much has to be guaranteed if people who can't climb stairs are expected to rely on it.) New York has two two-track terminals laid out like Edgware Rd: Brighton Beach on the B and 57 St/7 Av on the Q. In both cases, cross-platform transfers are available (guaranteed!) at the previous stop; regular riders who need to transfer know not to wait until the terminal. -- David of Broadway New York, NY, USA |
#59
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: In article , (solar penguin) wrote: David Cantrell wrote: On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 06:02:31PM -0600, wrote: This would also appear to be because the Journey Planner thinks there will still be a Circle Line service from king's Cross to High St Kensington on 14 December! Bloody useless! There will be. It'll just take a long time, going the wrong way roudn the circle. Or going via Hammersmith. No effing use for users of the Wimbledon branch! Not necessarily. The lifts give you step-free access to the Westbound District platforms at Earl's Court. ![]() Or how about Wimbledon, Waterloo, Waterloo East, London Bridge, St. Pancras Low Level for a more imaginative step-free route... ![]() ![]() |
#60
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
(David of Broadway) wrote: On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:24:19 +0000, Basil Jet wrote: wrote: That won't be possible after 13 December. There will be no guaranteed step-free route from Earl's Court to King's Cross. Yes there will - the Circles will all terminate alongside the Barkingbound platform, and the Wimblewares will all terminate alongside the Hammersmithbound platform. (Or was it the other way around?) Is that guaranteed? If trains arrive out of sequence (e.g., a Wimbleware was running late at Earl's Court so a Circle snuck ahead of it into High St Kensington), will the second Circle really wait for the first one to depart (thereby holding up the trains behind it as well) rather than simply taking the available track? And then the two back-to-back Wimblewares would have a similar problem. (It pretty much has to be guaranteed if people who can't climb stairs are expected to rely on it.) New York has two two-track terminals laid out like Edgware Rd: Brighton Beach on the B and 57 St/7 Av on the Q. In both cases, cross-platform transfers are available (guaranteed!) at the previous stop; regular riders who need to transfer know not to wait until the terminal. Wimbleware to Kings Cross pax have of course got exactly that guarantee at Paddington (and stations from High St) now but will lose it from December. That is precisely my gripe. -- Colin Rosenstiel |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Walton-on-Thames railway station no longer a bus teacup. | London Transport | |||
So what's going wrong with the Jubilee line? | London Transport | |||
teacup | London Transport | |||
Is the teacup necessary? | London Transport | |||
Oyster Prepay capping publicity | London Transport |