Home Menu

Menu


London Banter » Search Forums > Search Results
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Showing results 1 to 25 of 40
Search took 0.02 seconds. Search: Posts made by: Silk
Forum: London Transport March 29th 12, 10:18 AM
Replies: 10
Views: 2,708
Posted By Silk
cyclist accidents

On 29/03/2012 10:37, wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:43:23 +0100
wrote:
'martyn dawe[_2_ Wrote:
;129272']whenever I hear of...
Forum: London Transport March 21st 09, 10:51 AM
Replies: 76
Views: 13,296
Posted By Silk
Google puts (some of) Britain on the map

Tooomy wrote:
"Steve Firth" wrote in message
...
wrote:

Helen Deborah Vecht...
Forum: London Transport June 27th 07, 07:13 PM
Replies: 101
Views: 18,909
Posted By Silk
seeing the other's view

Conor wrote:


"Silk" wrote in message
...
Conor wrote:

No problem Robin. I take it you'll be happy with a hike in the price...
Forum: London Transport June 27th 07, 05:55 PM
Replies: 101
Views: 18,909
Posted By Silk
seeing the other's view

Conor wrote:


"R.C. Payne" wrote in message
...
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
"NM" wrote in...
Forum: London Transport October 23rd 06, 06:01 PM
Replies: 96
Views: 19,623
Posted By Silk
Paul from SafeSpeed on BBC Breakfast today on Driving OffenceCameras

Brimstone wrote:
Silk wrote:
Knight Of The Road wrote:
"SteveH" wrote


automated revenue cameras
--
Forum: London Transport October 23rd 06, 06:00 PM
Replies: 96
Views: 19,623
Posted By Silk
Paul from SafeSpeed on BBC Breakfast today on Driving OffenceCameras

Knight Of The Road wrote:

If the road is good for 60 or 70, then you won't be penalised for driving at
60 or 70.

You will if someone puts up a number on a pole followed by a yellow box.
...
Forum: London Transport October 22nd 06, 02:20 PM
Replies: 96
Views: 19,623
Posted By Silk
Paul from SafeSpeed on BBC Breakfast today on Driving OffenceCameras

Knight Of The Road wrote:
"SteveH" wrote


automated revenue cameras
--



Forum: London Transport December 26th 03, 08:07 PM
Replies: 360
Views: 56,313
Posted By Silk
reducing congestion

Ian Smith wrote:

If it weren't for unions, most of us would be working 18 hours a
day, with 1 ****e break, and earn just enough money to afford bread,
water, and a cardboard box to live...
Forum: London Transport December 25th 03, 09:52 AM
Replies: 360
Views: 56,313
Posted By Silk
reducing congestion

Purditer wrote:


I was always surprised by the sudden increase in value of these houses, who
in their right mind would want to buy a house on a council estate unless the
price was artificially...
Forum: London Transport December 25th 03, 09:23 AM
Replies: 360
Views: 56,313
Posted By Silk
reducing congestion

Conor wrote:


Millions were in the same boat. Strangely they seemed to be those who
worked the hardest for the least rewards.

For the first time in years, it was plain to see that the lazy...
Forum: London Transport December 24th 03, 05:31 PM
Replies: 360
Views: 56,313
Posted By Silk
reducing congestion

Cast_Iron wrote:

However, one
must not confuse an appreciation of reality with NG discussion.


I never do that. :-)
Forum: London Transport December 23rd 03, 04:29 PM
Replies: 360
Views: 56,313
Posted By Silk
reducing congestion

Cast_Iron wrote:


Are you admitting by that statement that you are sufficiently unintelligent
that you are incapable of treating other people in a reasonable manner?


No, I'm simply being...
Forum: London Transport December 23rd 03, 04:26 PM
Replies: 360
Views: 56,313
Posted By Silk
reducing congestion

Purditer wrote:


Not from London then?

No.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/3326735.stm

Typical union. Sounds like the bloke deserved the sack.
Forum: London Transport December 23rd 03, 04:14 PM
Replies: 360
Views: 56,313
Posted By Silk
reducing congestion

Purditer wrote:

General Secretary of the RMT

Never heard of him.
Forum: London Transport December 23rd 03, 03:55 PM
Replies: 360
Views: 56,313
Posted By Silk
reducing congestion

Cast_Iron wrote:


Ah at last, the standard "**** you Jack, I'm OK" attitude.


It's **** or be ****ed, unfortunately. That's why we are supposed to
have governments and leaders to guide us.
Forum: London Transport December 23rd 03, 03:53 PM
Replies: 360
Views: 56,313
Posted By Silk
reducing congestion

Purditer wrote:


and no one is as bad as Bob Crow.

Who?
Forum: London Transport December 23rd 03, 03:44 PM
Replies: 360
Views: 56,313
Posted By Silk
reducing congestion

Purditer wrote:


The worst ones are the working class who imagine their new money makes them
middle class.

Not as bad as the career dole scroungers who think they are working class.
Forum: London Transport December 23rd 03, 03:41 PM
Replies: 360
Views: 56,313
Posted By Silk
reducing congestion

Conor wrote:


My solution? Stop their benefits.

But, you keep telling us there's no work. Make your mind up.
Forum: London Transport December 23rd 03, 03:40 PM
Replies: 360
Views: 56,313
Posted By Silk
reducing congestion

Conor wrote:


Dairy.

Except the bit about making hay for the cattle to eat in the winter,
that is.
Forum: London Transport December 23rd 03, 03:34 PM
Replies: 360
Views: 56,313
Posted By Silk
reducing congestion

Oliver Keating wrote:


but the working class have
remained pretty much static, they haven't shared in the growth at all.

That's probably because they're lazy whingebags.
Forum: London Transport December 23rd 03, 03:32 PM
Replies: 360
Views: 56,313
Posted By Silk
reducing congestion

Conor wrote:


I seem to remember getting my arse truly reamed by Thatchers policies
in the late 80's.

Perhaps you deserved it.
Forum: London Transport December 23rd 03, 03:31 PM
Replies: 360
Views: 56,313
Posted By Silk
reducing congestion

Conor wrote:


Really? I suppose the railways are better than they used to be?
Especially in respect to track maintenance.

What's that got to do with Thatcher?
Forum: London Transport December 22nd 03, 08:43 AM
Replies: 360
Views: 56,313
Posted By Silk
reducing congestion

JohnB wrote:

Thank you for showing your ignorance.
In this case the work is throughout the year.

Please give an example of a type of farming that is not seasonal.

I'm sure there are a lot of...
Forum: London Transport December 21st 03, 08:57 PM
Replies: 360
Views: 56,313
Posted By Silk
reducing congestion

Cast_Iron wrote:

Was it and it is now better in what way do you think?

In every way possible.
Forum: London Transport December 21st 03, 08:55 PM
Replies: 360
Views: 56,313
Posted By Silk
reducing congestion

JohnB wrote:


If you don't even know the area being discussed your opinion is worthless.
BTW its not seasonal work.

*All* farming is seasonal.
Showing results 1 to 25 of 40
Page 1 of 2 1 2

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Contact Us LondonBanter Home Privacy Statement
Copyright © 2017