On 23 Nov, 13:50, John Bull wrote:
And is the inclusion of overground services to Heathrow an indication that
Heathrow Connect will be an Oysterable service?

Paul Scott is correct - Heathrow Connect beyond H&H is not covered by
Oyster.

Having spent the morning flicking through the "official" media docs.
Things that caught my eye a

1) No mention of OEPs. At all. TfL have since told me they'll only
affect 0.04% of passengers which presumably is justification for their
low key coverage.

Yes but it will generate 100% of the bad publicity when people start
being penalty fared !!

On 23 Nov, 14:02, trainmanUK wrote:
On 23 Nov, 13:50, John Bull wrote:

And is the inclusion of overground services to Heathrow an indication that
Heathrow Connect will be an Oysterable service?

Paul Scott is correct - Heathrow Connect beyond H&H is not covered by
Oyster.

Having spent the morning flicking through the "official" media docs.
Things that caught my eye a

1) No mention of OEPs. At all. TfL have since told me they'll only
affect 0.04% of passengers which presumably is justification for their
low key coverage.

Yes but it will generate 100% of the bad publicity when people start
being penalty fared !!

Someone should point out that it may be 0.04% of journeys, but not
necessarily 0.04% of passengers. Everyone with a travelcard may
extend beyond their zones for 0.04% of their journeys or something,
but if they get screwed the first time they do, that's a lot of
"customers" who won't be very gruntled about Oyster.

On Nov 23, 2:08*pm, MIG wrote:
On 23 Nov, 14:02, trainmanUK wrote:



On 23 Nov, 13:50, John Bull wrote:

And is the inclusion of overground services to Heathrow an indication that
Heathrow Connect will be an Oysterable service?

Paul Scott is correct - Heathrow Connect beyond H&H is not covered by
Oyster.

Having spent the morning flicking through the "official" media docs.
Things that caught my eye a

1) No mention of OEPs. At all. TfL have since told me they'll only
affect 0.04% of passengers which presumably is justification for their
low key coverage.

Yes but it will generate 100% of the bad publicity when people start
being penalty fared !!

Someone should point out that it may be 0.04% of journeys, but not
necessarily 0.04% of passengers. *Everyone with a travelcard may
extend beyond their zones for 0.04% of their journeys or something,
but if they get screwed the first time they do, that's a lot of
"customers" who won't be very gruntled about Oyster.

Aye - "passengers" was their term, but its a very vague one.

In fairness, I can understand where they're coming from in playing
down OEPs. But as has been commented up-thread, it seems a recipe for
negative feedback down the line when Elsie 85 from Clapton gets her
photo in the paper waving a penalty notice in one hand and an Oyster
Card in the other because "no one told 'er about no extension permit
in the paper."

In message
, at
07:12:32 on Mon, 23 Nov 2009, John Bull
remarked:
In fairness, I can understand where they're coming from in playing
down OEPs.

OK, I give up. What's an OEP?

http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/OEP
--
Roland Perry

"Roland Perry" wrote in message
...

OK, I give up. What's an OEP?

I was petrified of asking that here in case I got a Malcolm Tucker-style
bollocking, so I searched around. It means "Oyster Extension Permit". I
think it only applies to people with Travelcards on their oyster who want to
go outside their permitted zone (or something like that!).

http://groups.google.com/group/uk.tr...781213104d6d26

Ian

In message
, John
Bull writes

In fairness, I can understand where they're coming from in playing
down OEPs. But as has been commented up-thread, it seems a recipe for
negative feedback down the line when Elsie 85 from Clapton gets her
photo in the paper waving a penalty notice in one hand and an Oyster
Card in the other because "no one told 'er about no extension permit
in the paper."

Elsie 85 from Clapton is highly unlikely to be PF'd as she would be
travelling on her Freedom pass !

--
Paul Terry

On Nov 23, 3:36*pm, Paul Terry wrote:
In message
, John
Bull writes

In fairness, I can understand where they're coming from in playing
down OEPs. But as has been commented up-thread, it seems a recipe for
negative feedback down the line when Elsie 85 from Clapton gets her
photo in the paper waving a penalty notice in one hand and an Oyster
Card in the other because "no one told 'er about no extension permit
in the paper."

Elsie 85 from Clapton is highly unlikely to be PF'd as she would be
travelling on her Freedom pass !

--
Paul Terry

Christ - don't tell Elsie that or she'll be in the papers AGAIN.

Yeah, sorry, bad example age-wise!

On Nov 23, 3:47 pm, John Bull wrote:
On Nov 23, 3:36 pm, Paul Terry wrote:
Elsie 85 from Clapton is highly unlikely to be PF'd as she would be
travelling on her Freedom pass !

Christ - don't tell Elsie that or she'll be in the papers AGAIN.

Yeah, sorry, bad example age-wise!

Or perhaps you meant Elsie from Clapton, Somerset who is in London on
a trip?

--
Abi