Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greetings.
I often take the train between Liverpool Street and Stratford and have noticed that at the former station the higher-numbered platforms reek of decaying human excrement. Apparently the tracks in question serve as an open cesspit for waste flushed from the train toilets. This surprises me; surely in this day and age it is possible to build train toilets which either use septic tanks, or whose flush mechanisms can be disabled while the train is at a station. Are there no local or national laws or regulations concerning the construction of train toilets, and the dumping of human waste in indoor train stations? Perhaps the problem is purely cosmetic rather than a public health issue, but in that case couldn't the station at the very least apply some deodouriser to the affected tracks? I have been in pit toilets which smelled better than those platforms. Regards, Tristan -- _ _V.-o Tristan Miller Space is limited / |`-' -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- In a haiku, so it's hard (7_\\ http://www.nothingisreal.com/ To finish what you |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 15, 11:55*am, Tristan Miller
wrote: Greetings. I often take the train between Liverpool Street and Stratford and have noticed that at the former station the higher-numbered platforms reek of decaying human excrement. *Apparently the tracks in question serve as an open cesspit for waste flushed from the train toilets. This surprises me; surely in this day and age it is possible to build train toilets which either use septic tanks, or whose flush mechanisms can be disabled while the train is at a station. *Are there no local or national laws or regulations concerning the construction of train toilets, and the dumping of human waste in indoor train stations? *Perhaps the problem is purely cosmetic rather than a public health issue, but in that case couldn't the station at the very least apply some deodouriser to the affected tracks? *I have been in pit toilets which smelled better than those platforms. There aren't any specific regulations on the, erm, dumping. There are regulations on construction, which mean that all new trains with toilets for the last 20 years have retention toilets. Unfortunately, the long-distance trains running out of Liverpool Street - loco-hauled mk3s and 317s - are 30 and 25 years old respectively, and hence discharge onto the track. When they expire, they'll be replaced by trains which don't. -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15 Dec, 13:09, John B wrote:
On Dec 15, 11:55*am, Tristan Miller wrote: Greetings. I often take the train between Liverpool Street and Stratford and have noticed that at the former station the higher-numbered platforms reek of decaying human excrement. *Apparently the tracks in question serve as an open cesspit for waste flushed from the train toilets. This surprises me; surely in this day and age it is possible to build train toilets which either use septic tanks, or whose flush mechanisms can be disabled while the train is at a station. *Are there no local or national laws or regulations concerning the construction of train toilets, and the dumping of human waste in indoor train stations? *Perhaps the problem is purely cosmetic rather than a public health issue, but in that case couldn't the station at the very least apply some deodouriser to the affected tracks? *I have been in pit toilets which smelled better than those platforms. There aren't any specific regulations on the, erm, dumping. There are regulations on construction, which mean that all new trains with toilets for the last 20 years have retention toilets. Unfortunately, the long-distance trains running out of Liverpool Street - loco-hauled mk3s and 317s - are 30 and 25 years old respectively, and hence discharge onto the track. When they expire, they'll be replaced by trains which don't. Not quite 20 years. The 321s must have been introduced later than that, and still flush on to the tracks. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:34:52 -0800 (PST), MIG
wrote: Not quite 20 years. The 321s must have been introduced later than that, and still flush on to the tracks. The most recent stock with dump-on-the-track bogs is, I'd think, the early-1990s Class 158. Or do the Network Turbos have such bogs? Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the at to reply. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tristan Miller" wrote in message
... Greetings. I often take the train between Liverpool Street and Stratford and have noticed that at the former station the higher-numbered platforms reek of decaying human excrement. Apparently the tracks in question serve as an open cesspit for waste flushed from the train toilets. This surprises me; surely in this day and age it is possible to build train toilets which either use septic tanks, or whose flush mechanisms can be disabled while the train is at a station. Are there no local or national laws or regulations concerning the construction of train toilets, and the dumping of human waste in indoor train stations? Perhaps the problem is purely cosmetic rather than a public health issue, but in that case couldn't the station at the very least apply some deodouriser to the affected tracks? I have been in pit toilets which smelled better than those platforms. Regards, Tristan Plat.2 at Victoria is the same, after the Orient Express has been in on a Thursday night its disgusting down there. I seem to remember someone telling me a while ago that he had been working at Paddington cleaning turds from plastic sheets laid in the 4' on some platforms to stop "effluent" from contaminating the ballast, and I do recall seeing some black sheets in the 4' when I had to collect some paperwork from the MDU a couple of months ago. james |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
jamesd1974 wrote:
"Tristan Miller" wrote in message ... I often take the train between Liverpool Street and Stratford and have noticed that at the former station the higher-numbered platforms reek of decaying human excrement. Apparently the tracks in question serve as an open cesspit for waste flushed from the train toilets. Plat.2 at Victoria is the same, after the Orient Express has been in on a Thursday night its disgusting down there. Presumably all these trains are still displaying 'do not flush in stations' notices as well... People just don't care though. Paul S |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Neil Williams wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:34:52 -0800 (PST), MIG wrote: The most recent stock with dump-on-the-track bogs is, I'd think, the early-1990s Class 158. Or do the Network Turbos have such bogs? No - 16x/36x/46x are all CET. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Paul Scott" wrote in message
... jamesd1974 wrote: "Tristan Miller" wrote in message ... I often take the train between Liverpool Street and Stratford and have noticed that at the former station the higher-numbered platforms reek of decaying human excrement. Apparently the tracks in question serve as an open cesspit for waste flushed from the train toilets. Plat.2 at Victoria is the same, after the Orient Express has been in on a Thursday night its disgusting down there. Presumably all these trains are still displaying 'do not flush in stations' notices as well... People just don't care though. When you've got to go, you've got to go! It'd be rude to leave a floater, so it's only polite to flush. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 15, 8:36*pm, (Neil Williams)
wrote: On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:34:52 -0800 (PST), MIG wrote: Not quite 20 years. *The 321s must have been introduced later than that, and still flush on to the tracks. Really quite surprised by that, given that they're just a later build of 319s with a different front end. The most recent stock with dump-on-the-track bogs is, I'd think, the early-1990s Class 158. Yes, actually I did/should know that, as I knew that SWT converted its fleet by adding retention tanks. -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 16 Dec, 22:47, John B wrote:
On Dec 15, 8:36*pm, (Neil Williams) wrote: On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:34:52 -0800 (PST), MIG wrote: Not quite 20 years. *The 321s must have been introduced later than that, and still flush on to the tracks. Really quite surprised by that, given that they're just a later build of 319s with a different front end. I was kind of surprised a few years ago when I first noticed it. Mind you, they were plugged as something very new and special before they were introduced, and turned out to be 317s with a sexier front. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Best way on tube from Liverpool Street to Hatton Cross | London Transport | |||
Liverpool Street - Central Line Sidings | London Transport | |||
Trains to Moorgate now go via Liverpool Street | London Transport | |||
Bus Liverpool street (?) Bayswater | London Transport | |||
Closure of Liverpool Street this morning | London Transport |