Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3 Jan, 15:13, asdf wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 18:16:51 -0800 (PST), MIG wrote: *Which is presumably why the northbound Bakerloo at Piccadilly Circus had to be extended over the crossover at the north end, I didn't know the northbound platform had been extended over the crossover. Does this mean a southbound train using the crossover to enter the northbound platform has to go beyond the platform before it can reverse and become a northbound train? Ah, no, because like many Bakerloo stations, the platforms are on the outside, unlike the island platform layout that was used on the CLR. So from the platform, you simply look across the crossover. I should have said "beyond" rather than "over". |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3 Jan, 21:34, MIG wrote:
On 3 Jan, 15:13, asdf wrote: On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 18:16:51 -0800 (PST), MIG wrote: *Which is presumably why the northbound Bakerloo at Piccadilly Circus had to be extended over the crossover at the north end, I didn't know the northbound platform had been extended over the crossover. Does this mean a southbound train using the crossover to enter the northbound platform has to go beyond the platform before it can reverse and become a northbound train? Ah, no, because like many Bakerloo stations, the platforms are on the outside, unlike the island platform layout that was used on the CLR. So from the platform, you simply look across the crossover. *I should have said "beyond" rather than "over". Duh. I see what you mean now. Yes, I suppose so, but maybe they'd only reverse north from the southbound platform. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3 Jan, 21:37, MIG wrote:
On 3 Jan, 21:34, MIG wrote: On 3 Jan, 15:13, asdf wrote: On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 18:16:51 -0800 (PST), MIG wrote: *Which is presumably why the northbound Bakerloo at Piccadilly Circus had to be extended over the crossover at the north end, I didn't know the northbound platform had been extended over the crossover. Does this mean a southbound train using the crossover to enter the northbound platform has to go beyond the platform before it can reverse and become a northbound train? Ah, no, because like many Bakerloo stations, the platforms are on the outside, unlike the island platform layout that was used on the CLR. So from the platform, you simply look across the crossover. *I should have said "beyond" rather than "over". Duh. *I see what you mean now. Yes, I suppose so, but maybe they'd only reverse north from the southbound platform. And in fact (why don't I check before posting) there's only the trailing crossover, so you can't get into the northbound platform from the north. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 13:40:18 -0800 (PST), MIG wrote:
On 3 Jan, 21:37, MIG wrote: On 3 Jan, 21:34, MIG wrote: On 3 Jan, 15:13, asdf wrote: On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 18:16:51 -0800 (PST), MIG wrote: *Which is presumably why the northbound Bakerloo at Piccadilly Circus had to be extended over the crossover at the north end, I didn't know the northbound platform had been extended over the crossover. Does this mean a southbound train using the crossover to enter the northbound platform has to go beyond the platform before it can reverse and become a northbound train? Ah, no, because like many Bakerloo stations, the platforms are on the outside, unlike the island platform layout that was used on the CLR. So from the platform, you simply look across the crossover. *I should have said "beyond" rather than "over". Duh. *I see what you mean now. Yes, I suppose so, but maybe they'd only reverse north from the southbound platform. And in fact (why don't I check before posting) there's only the trailing crossover, so you can't get into the northbound platform from the north. I guess I'm the one that should have checked - for some reason I thought it was a facing crossover. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2010-01-04 00:55:12 +0000, asdf said:
On Ah, no, because like many Bakerloo stations, the platforms are on the outside, unlike the island platform layout that was used on the CLR. So from the platform, you simply look across the crossover. *I should have said "beyond" rather than "over". Duh. *I see what you mean now. Yes, I suppose so, but maybe they'd only reverse north from the southbound platform. And in fact (why don't I check before posting) there's only the trailing crossover, so you can't get into the northbound platform from the north. I guess I'm the one that should have checked - for some reason I thought it was a facing crossover. My memory may be erroneous, but I thought that once there was a scissors crossover here. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 Jan, 16:37, Ken Wheatley wrote:
On 2010-01-04 00:55:12 +0000, asdf said: On Ah, no, because like many Bakerloo stations, the platforms are on the outside, unlike the island platform layout that was used on the CLR. So from the platform, you simply look across the crossover. I should have said "beyond" rather than "over". Duh. I see what you mean now. Yes, I suppose so, but maybe they'd only reverse north from the southbound platform. And in fact (why don't I check before posting) there's only the trailing crossover, so you can't get into the northbound platform from the north. I guess I'm the one that should have checked - for some reason I thought it was a facing crossover. My memory may be erroneous, but I thought that once there was a scissors crossover here. It was replaced last year, but it seems to have been the same immediately before according to the 2002 Quail. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2010-01-05 20:35:40 +0000, MIG said:
On 5 Jan, 16:37, Ken Wheatley wrote: On 2010-01-04 00:55:12 +0000, asdf said: My memory may be erroneous, but I thought that once there was a scissors crossover here. It was replaced last year, but it seems to have been the same immediately before according to the 2002 Quail. I'm talking about when my brother and I used to occasionally travel to Willesden Junction. We, being aged about 8 and 6, called the north end of the northbound Bakerloo platform at Piccadilly Circus 'The Noise Box' because of the extremely loud noise of the 1938TS crashing over the points. I'd say about 1963-5! We got to hear this noise quite a lot, as it seemed to us that most trains went to Stanmore and most of the rest terminated at Queens Park. We couldn't catch the latter and change onto the Euston-Watford service as it seemed to be against my father's religion. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I agree with the above information and I'm trying to get to Bank station from London Bridge tomorrow, is that journey possible? |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes.may be possible and its depends upon your idea and have a nice journey....
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Routes in london crossing without any interchange | London Transport | |||
Routes in london crossing without any interchange | London Transport | |||
UTS Gate Codes - Illogical Interchange | London Transport | |||
UTS Gate Codes - Illogical Interchange | London Transport | |||
UTS Gate Codes - Illogical Interchange | London Transport |