Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In wondering about what happens with shared barriers, ambiguous
platform readers etc, I looked up fares from Greenwich and Lewisham, both boundary zone 2/3, to Euston LU (random zone 1) on the TfL Fare Finder. It seems at a glance that it's cheaper from Greenwich than from Lewisham, but the same from Greenwich as from Lewisham DLR. (Unlike some, Greenwich doesn't offer separate DLR and NR options in the drop-down, presumably because of a shared entrance. Are any of the readers dedicated, eg the one on the DLR platform that's also the NR platform?) I also note that it's more expensive from Deptford to Euston than Greenwich to Euston. Could it be that DLR is assumed? If you click on "plan this journey" it tells you to go via London Bridge NR, with no warning about fares. If you click on the button to check if there are CHEAPER fares/routes, it then offers via London Bridge NR (and other NR) as being at the same price as from Lewisham or Deptford, ie more EXPENSIVE. So, presumably in practice you'd be told the DLR fare, with no warning that there's a more expensive fare, and be advised to travel via London Bridge, and then find yourself deducted the higher fare? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MIG wrote:
In wondering about what happens with shared barriers, ambiguous platform readers etc, I looked up fares from Greenwich and Lewisham, both boundary zone 2/3, to Euston LU (random zone 1) on the TfL Fare Finder. It seems at a glance that it's cheaper from Greenwich than from Lewisham, but the same from Greenwich as from Lewisham DLR. (Unlike some, Greenwich doesn't offer separate DLR and NR options in the drop-down, presumably because of a shared entrance. Are any of the readers dedicated, eg the one on the DLR platform that's also the NR platform?) I also note that it's more expensive from Deptford to Euston than Greenwich to Euston. Could it be that DLR is assumed? If you click on "plan this journey" it tells you to go via London Bridge NR, with no warning about fares. If you click on the button to check if there are CHEAPER fares/routes, it then offers via London Bridge NR (and other NR) as being at the same price as from Lewisham or Deptford, ie more EXPENSIVE. So, presumably in practice you'd be told the DLR fare, with no warning that there's a more expensive fare, and be advised to travel via London Bridge, and then find yourself deducted the higher fare? I was wondering this when looking at fares from Bromley South to Balham. The default fare is via Brixton & Stockwell, but the 'Plan this journey' button merrily suggests routes via Victoria (and SN to Balham). It's a shame the two parts of the system don't seem to talk to each other (see DB's HAFAS for an example of how it could be done). With all my prepay shenanigans today, I was however rather impressed with the following. I arrived at Shepherds Bush (Central) having touched in at West Drayton. The gate deducted the correct Z6-5 fare. I then touched in at the Overground gateline, changed my mind and walked out again, noticing that the LO gate appeared to deduct another £1.30. When I checked at a Tube machine (didn't seem to be possible on the LO machine) it had refunded the £1.30 when I touched in at the LO gateline, presumably because the Shepherds Bushes are an OOSI and was treating this as a continuation of my West Drayton journey. When I changed my mind, the £1.30 was taken off again and my journey was re-closed. I'm quite impressed it coped with all that ![]() -- Current nearest station: Paddington |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Paul Corfield
writes The button only says Alternative Fares - that does not mean cheaper. In many cases I have looked at the alternative fares can be cheaper or more expensive or even have several sets of more expensive options. There's also the difficulty that the Alternative Fares often don't show practical alternatives that can be both cheaper and faster, unless you know exactly what to type in. For example, Lewisham (DLR) to Bank is £2.30 (£1.80 off-peak), but the considerably faster SouthEastern service from Lewisham (NR) to Cannon Street is cheaper at £2.10 (or £1.70 off-peak). -- Paul Terry |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Jan, 18:28, Paul Terry wrote:
In message , Paul Corfield writes The button only says Alternative Fares - that does not mean cheaper. In many cases I have looked at the alternative fares can be cheaper or more expensive or even have several sets of more expensive options. There's also the difficulty that the Alternative Fares often don't show practical alternatives that can be both cheaper and faster, unless you know exactly what to type in. For example, Lewisham (DLR) to Bank is £2.30 (£1.80 off-peak), but the considerably faster SouthEastern service from Lewisham (NR) to Cannon Street is cheaper at £2.10 (or £1.70 off-peak). The button itself says "alternative fares". The text next to it says "Alternative Oyster single fares, which may be cheaper, are available for this journey". That doesn't suggest to me that the obvious route, which their planner is about to suggest, is more expensive than the fare shown, so the information is simply false, whatever the excuse. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Single fare finder | London Transport | |||
New online "Single fare finder" for Tube & DLR | London Transport | |||
London Underground routes finder and plotter | London Transport | |||
Reduction in Chiltern Services and Funding of Shared Met Line | London Transport | |||
Oystercards at shared LU/NR stations | London Transport |