Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I see that validators have at last been fixed at the entrances to the
platforms at Euston that previously lacked them (platforms 1-3, 4-7 & 12-15). I wonder whether Virgin will accept PAYG when they run special timetables that include set down stops at Watford Junction? The EMT gateline at St Pancras International has also been upgraded to Oyster (presumably for Thameslink diversions.) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 15, 12:26*am, Ben More wrote:
On Jan 15, 12:17*am, Matthew Dickinson wrote: I see that validators have at last been fixed at the entrances to the platforms at Euston that previously lacked them (platforms 1-3, 4-7 & 12-15). I wonder whether Virgin will accept PAYG when they run special timetables that include set down stops at Watford Junction? The EMT gateline at St Pancras International has also been upgraded to Oyster (presumably for Thameslink diversions.) You will probably find that Virgin wont accept Oyster, as Watford is more of a pick up outward and set down stop in to London. As the OP was asking about when there are problems on the southern WCML and Virgin allow Euston - Watford journeys on their trains, then I would say that they probably would. I have actually done this (in April 2009) long before the new validators were installed (I have a travelcard season and so no need to touch in). On this occasion, the Virgin barrier staff were a bit overwhelmed as trains were being announced at the last minute and ticket checks were not thorough. At Euston, in these situations, announcements are generally made about Virgin accepting LM tickets (and vice-versa), so they would have trouble refusing them. The validators are more likely for use by LM passengers on peak time trains that dont use platforms 8-11 due to capacity constraints, and it provides more operation flexibility when there are problems or delays meaning trains cant use designated platforms. It is no longer just peak LM trains that use these platforms, LM now have 6 trains per hour off-peak which is too much just for platforms 8, 10 and 11 to cope with (after allowing for turn around time; platform 9 being dedicated to London Overground). LM arrivals rise to 11 in the morning peak between 08.00 and 09.00, several of which are 12 cars and so will only currently fit in platform 8 of the 'suburban' platforms. Indeed, in the previous timetable, you could occasionally see an evening peak hour Virgin service in platform 11, as it is long enough for a Pendolino, but not a 12 car class 350. Oyster validators were put on the exit from platform 16-18, soon after LM started to accept Oyster, but several services (both peak and non- peak) used at least platforms 1-3, 7 and 12 regularly with Oyster PAYG users, from Watford, Bushey and Harrow having to walk to the platform 11 gate line to touch out. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jan 15, 12:52 am, Andy wrote: On Jan 15, 12:26 am, Ben More wrote: On Jan 15, 12:17 am, Matthew Dickinson wrote: I see that validators have at last been fixed at the entrances to the platforms at Euston that previously lacked them (platforms 1-3, 4-7 & 12-15). I wonder whether Virgin will accept PAYG when they run special timetables that include set down stops at Watford Junction? The EMT gateline at St Pancras International has also been upgraded to Oyster (presumably for Thameslink diversions.) You will probably find that Virgin wont accept Oyster, as Watford is more of a pick up outward and set down stop in to London. As the OP was asking about when there are problems on the southern WCML and Virgin allow Euston - Watford journeys on their trains, then I would say that they probably would. I have actually done this (in April 2009) long before the new validators were installed (I have a travelcard season and so no need to touch in). On this occasion, the Virgin barrier staff were a bit overwhelmed as trains were being announced at the last minute and ticket checks were not thorough. At Euston, in these situations, announcements are generally made about Virgin accepting LM tickets (and vice-versa), so they would have trouble refusing them. Agreed - if VT are accepting LM pax and tickets for trips to Watford Jn (and, who knows, maybe even Harrow & Wealdstone if something's totally, utterly and completely up the spout) then they'll have to accept Oyster PAYG. The validators are more likely for use by LM passengers on peak time trains that dont use platforms 8-11 due to capacity constraints, and it provides more operation flexibility when there are problems or delays meaning trains cant use designated platforms. It is no longer just peak LM trains that use these platforms, LM now have 6 trains per hour off-peak which is too much just for platforms 8, 10 and 11 to cope with (after allowing for turn around time; platform 9 being dedicated to London Overground). LM arrivals rise to 11 in the morning peak between 08.00 and 09.00, several of which are 12 cars and so will only currently fit in platform 8 of the 'suburban' platforms. Indeed, in the previous timetable, you could occasionally see an evening peak hour Virgin service in platform 11, as it is long enough for a Pendolino, but not a 12 car class 350. Oyster validators were put on the exit from platform 16-18, soon after LM started to accept Oyster, but several services (both peak and non- peak) used at least platforms 1-3, 7 and 12 regularly with Oyster PAYG users, from Watford, Bushey and Harrow having to walk to the platform 11 gate line to touch out. Before that (i.e. in Silverlink days) there was however a single Oyster validator next to a girder near the ramp leading up from platforms 16-18 - this wasn't exactly obvious, but then it was only for the sole use of pax heading to or from Harrow & Wealdstone - though Silverlink certainly didn't make any effort to draw any attention to the fact that Oyster PAYG was in fact valid on the fast trains twixt Euston and H&W. (This was of course back in the pre-LO dark ages when it wasn't valid on the DC line at Kilburn High Road or South Hampstead, not north of H&W - the fact that TfL manage to negotiate PAYG being valid north of Queen's Park was arguably in itself a minor miracle, given that traditionally mainline fares - i.e. BR/NR - applied on this stretch of the Bakerloo line.) Re the mention of Oyster and Virgin - it's not a PAYG issue at all, but there was of course MIG's saga of trying to get Virgin Trains to accept that a Travelcard loaded on Oyster plus a paper Boundary Zone ticket (e.g. BZ 6 to Milton Keynes) could legitimately be used on their services. I'm not sure there was ever a satisfactory conclusion to this, was there? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:32:09 -0800 (PST), Mizter T wrote:
(This was of course back in the pre-LO dark ages when it wasn't valid on the DC line at Kilburn High Road or South Hampstead, not north of H&W - the fact that TfL manage to negotiate PAYG being valid north of Queen's Park was arguably in itself a minor miracle, given that traditionally mainline fares - i.e. BR/NR - applied on this stretch of the Bakerloo line.) At the time PAYG was introduced, Queens Park - Kenton was interavailable; it was only Kenton - H&W that was NR fares only. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 15, 1:32*am, Mizter T wrote:
On Jan 15, 12:52 am, Andy wrote: On Jan 15, 12:26 am, Ben More wrote: On Jan 15, 12:17 am, Matthew Dickinson wrote: I see that validators have at last been fixed at the entrances to the platforms at Euston that previously lacked them (platforms 1-3, 4-7 & 12-15). I wonder whether Virgin will accept PAYG when they run special timetables that include set down stops at Watford Junction? The EMT gateline at St Pancras International has also been upgraded to Oyster (presumably for Thameslink diversions.) You will probably find that Virgin wont accept Oyster, as Watford is more of a pick up outward and set down stop in to London. As the OP was asking about when there are problems on the southern WCML and Virgin allow Euston - Watford journeys on their trains, then I would say that they probably would. I have actually done this (in April 2009) long before the new validators were installed (I have a travelcard season and so no need to touch in). On this occasion, the Virgin barrier staff were a bit overwhelmed as trains were being announced at the last minute and ticket checks were not thorough. At Euston, in these situations, announcements are generally made about Virgin accepting LM tickets (and vice-versa), so they would have trouble refusing them. Agreed - if VT are accepting LM pax and tickets for trips to Watford Jn (and, who knows, maybe even Harrow & Wealdstone if something's totally, utterly and completely up the spout) then they'll have to accept Oyster PAYG. The validators are more likely for use by LM passengers on peak time trains that dont use platforms 8-11 due to capacity constraints, and it provides more operation flexibility when there are problems or delays meaning trains cant use designated platforms. It is no longer just peak LM trains that use these platforms, LM now have 6 trains per hour off-peak which is too much just for platforms 8, 10 and 11 to cope with (after allowing for turn around time; platform 9 being dedicated to London Overground). LM arrivals rise to 11 in the morning peak between 08.00 and 09.00, several of which are 12 cars and so will only currently fit in platform 8 of the 'suburban' platforms. Indeed, in the previous timetable, you could occasionally see an evening peak hour Virgin service in platform 11, as it is long enough for a Pendolino, but not a 12 car class 350. Oyster validators were put on the exit from platform 16-18, soon after LM started to accept Oyster, but several services (both peak and non- peak) used at least platforms 1-3, 7 and 12 regularly with Oyster PAYG users, from Watford, Bushey and Harrow having to walk to the platform 11 gate line to touch out. Before that (i.e. in Silverlink days) there was however a single Oyster validator next to a girder near the ramp leading up from platforms 16-18 - this wasn't exactly obvious, but then it was only for the sole use of pax heading to or from Harrow & Wealdstone - though Silverlink certainly didn't make any effort to draw any attention to the fact that Oyster PAYG was in fact valid on the fast trains twixt Euston and H&W. Thanks, I'd forgotten that one, which was a few years older. There are now also two at either side of the ramp leading up to the concourse which were a later addition. They pre-date the ones on the other platforms by quite a long time though. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jan 15, 7:57*am, asdf wrote: On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:32:09 -0800 (PST), Mizter T wrote: (This was of course back in the pre-LO dark ages when it wasn't valid on the DC line at Kilburn High Road or South Hampstead, not north of H&W - the fact that TfL manage to negotiate PAYG being valid north of Queen's Park was arguably in itself a minor miracle, given that traditionally mainline fares - i.e. BR/NR - applied on this stretch of the Bakerloo line.) At the time PAYG was introduced, Queens Park - Kenton was interavailable; it was only Kenton - H&W that was NR fares only. Indeed - my comments were just harking back to earlier times, though I grant you they could be seen as misleading. So, if we're doing clarity, I should point out that whilst Tube/NR paper tickets were indeed interavailable from Kenton to points south (but not from H&W), when PAYG was introduced TfL managed to negotiate to make it valid from H&W as well, including on the (slow *and* fast) NR services towards Euston - which was a minor achievement in itself. (And just to be ultra clear, the arrangement whereby NR fares applied for paper ticketing between Kenton and H&W nonetheless persisted for some years afterwards - it was only more recently that this inconsistency was done away with, and interavailability of paper tickets from H&W was ushered in). |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jan 15, 8:10*am, Andy wrote: On Jan 15, 1:32*am, Mizter T wrote: On Jan 15, 12:52 am, Andy wrote: [big snip] Oyster validators were put on the exit from platform 16-18, soon after LM started to accept Oyster, but several services (both peak and non- peak) used at least platforms 1-3, 7 and 12 regularly with Oyster PAYG users, from Watford, Bushey and Harrow having to walk to the platform 11 gate line to touch out. Before that (i.e. in Silverlink days) there was however a single Oyster validator next to a girder near the ramp leading up from platforms 16-18 - this wasn't exactly obvious, but then it was only for the sole use of pax heading to or from Harrow & Wealdstone - though Silverlink certainly didn't make any effort to draw any attention to the fact that Oyster PAYG was in fact valid on the fast trains twixt Euston and H&W. Thanks, I'd forgotten that one, which was a few years older. There are now also two at either side of the ramp leading up to the concourse which were a later addition. They pre-date the ones on the other platforms by quite a long time though. I think they date from sometime shortly after when London Midland relented and decided to allow PAYG on their fast trains from Watford Jn to Euston (after London Overground's acceptance of PAYG on the DC lines all the way to Watford Jn more or less forced their hand!). |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15 Jan, 10:11, Mizter T wrote:
On Jan 15, 8:10*am, Andy wrote: On Jan 15, 1:32*am, Mizter T wrote: On Jan 15, 12:52 am, Andy wrote: [big snip] Oyster validators were put on the exit from platform 16-18, soon after LM started to accept Oyster, but several services (both peak and non- peak) used at least platforms 1-3, 7 and 12 regularly with Oyster PAYG users, from Watford, Bushey and Harrow having to walk to the platform 11 gate line to touch out. Before that (i.e. in Silverlink days) there was however a single Oyster validator next to a girder near the ramp leading up from platforms 16-18 - this wasn't exactly obvious, but then it was only for the sole use of pax heading to or from Harrow & Wealdstone - though Silverlink certainly didn't make any effort to draw any attention to the fact that Oyster PAYG was in fact valid on the fast trains twixt Euston and H&W. Thanks, I'd forgotten that one, which was a few years older. There are now also two at either side of the ramp leading up to the concourse which were a later addition. They pre-date the ones on the other platforms by quite a long time though. I think they date from sometime shortly after when London Midland relented and decided to allow PAYG on their fast trains from Watford Jn to Euston (after London Overground's acceptance of PAYG on the DC lines all the way to Watford Jn more or less forced their hand!). Isn't that what I said in the first place ![]() older one by the pillar. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jan 15, 12:16*pm, Andy wrote: On 15 Jan, 10:11, Mizter T wrote: On Jan 15, 8:10*am, Andy wrote: On Jan 15, 1:32*am, Mizter T wrote: On Jan 15, 12:52 am, Andy wrote: [big snip] Oyster validators were put on the exit from platform 16-18, soon after LM started to accept Oyster, but several services (both peak and non- peak) used at least platforms 1-3, 7 and 12 regularly with Oyster PAYG users, from Watford, Bushey and Harrow having to walk to the platform 11 gate line to touch out. Before that (i.e. in Silverlink days) there was however a single Oyster validator next to a girder near the ramp leading up from platforms 16-18 - this wasn't exactly obvious, but then it was only for the sole use of pax heading to or from Harrow & Wealdstone - though Silverlink certainly didn't make any effort to draw any attention to the fact that Oyster PAYG was in fact valid on the fast trains twixt Euston and H&W. Thanks, I'd forgotten that one, which was a few years older. There are now also two at either side of the ramp leading up to the concourse which were a later addition. They pre-date the ones on the other platforms by quite a long time though. I think they date from sometime shortly after when London Midland relented and decided to allow PAYG on their fast trains from Watford Jn to Euston (after London Overground's acceptance of PAYG on the DC lines all the way to Watford Jn more or less forced their hand!). Isn't that what I said in the first place ![]() older one by the pillar. Yes it was, sorry! (Though of course LM accepted Oyster PAYG right from the very start between Euston and H&W, just as Silverlink had done before them... the big change was of course acceptance from Watford Jn. Were LM simply naive in not arranging to accept it from the get-go, or was it a negotiating position and they were simply trying to call TfL's bluff, in the hope of securing a better deal?) |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15 Jan, 01:32, Mizter T wrote:
On Jan 15, 12:52 am, Andy wrote: On Jan 15, 12:26 am, Ben More wrote: On Jan 15, 12:17 am, Matthew Dickinson wrote: I see that validators have at last been fixed at the entrances to the platforms at Euston that previously lacked them (platforms 1-3, 4-7 & 12-15). I wonder whether Virgin will accept PAYG when they run special timetables that include set down stops at Watford Junction? The EMT gateline at St Pancras International has also been upgraded to Oyster (presumably for Thameslink diversions.) You will probably find that Virgin wont accept Oyster, as Watford is more of a pick up outward and set down stop in to London. As the OP was asking about when there are problems on the southern WCML and Virgin allow Euston - Watford journeys on their trains, then I would say that they probably would. I have actually done this (in April 2009) long before the new validators were installed (I have a travelcard season and so no need to touch in). On this occasion, the Virgin barrier staff were a bit overwhelmed as trains were being announced at the last minute and ticket checks were not thorough. At Euston, in these situations, announcements are generally made about Virgin accepting LM tickets (and vice-versa), so they would have trouble refusing them. Agreed - if VT are accepting LM pax and tickets for trips to Watford Jn (and, who knows, maybe even Harrow & Wealdstone if something's totally, utterly and completely up the spout) then they'll have to accept Oyster PAYG. The validators are more likely for use by LM passengers on peak time trains that dont use platforms 8-11 due to capacity constraints, and it provides more operation flexibility when there are problems or delays meaning trains cant use designated platforms. It is no longer just peak LM trains that use these platforms, LM now have 6 trains per hour off-peak which is too much just for platforms 8, 10 and 11 to cope with (after allowing for turn around time; platform 9 being dedicated to London Overground). LM arrivals rise to 11 in the morning peak between 08.00 and 09.00, several of which are 12 cars and so will only currently fit in platform 8 of the 'suburban' platforms. Indeed, in the previous timetable, you could occasionally see an evening peak hour Virgin service in platform 11, as it is long enough for a Pendolino, but not a 12 car class 350. Oyster validators were put on the exit from platform 16-18, soon after LM started to accept Oyster, but several services (both peak and non- peak) used at least platforms 1-3, 7 and 12 regularly with Oyster PAYG users, from Watford, Bushey and Harrow having to walk to the platform 11 gate line to touch out. Before that (i.e. in Silverlink days) there was however a single Oyster validator next to a girder near the ramp leading up from platforms 16-18 - this wasn't exactly obvious, but then it was only for the sole use of pax heading to or from Harrow & Wealdstone - though Silverlink certainly didn't make any effort to draw any attention to the fact that Oyster PAYG was in fact valid on the fast trains twixt Euston and H&W. (This was of course back in the pre-LO dark ages when it wasn't valid on the DC line at Kilburn High Road or South Hampstead, not north of H&W - the fact that TfL manage to negotiate PAYG being valid north of Queen's Park was arguably in itself a minor miracle, given that traditionally mainline fares - i.e. BR/NR - applied on this stretch of the Bakerloo line.) Re the mention of Oyster and Virgin - it's not a PAYG issue at all, but there was of course MIG's saga of trying to get Virgin Trains to accept that a Travelcard loaded on Oyster plus a paper Boundary Zone ticket (e.g. BZ 6 to Milton Keynes) could legitimately be used on their services. I'm not sure there was ever a satisfactory conclusion to this, was there? See www.virgintrains.org.uk. I don't know where the pressure came from, but the turnaround may have been partly to do with LM's smartcard pilot. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oyster PAYG to Shenfield & Cheshunt | London Transport | |||
F&*&%^& toilets | London Transport | |||
Oyster virgin - be gentle | London Transport | |||
Amtrak (Washington) vs Virgin Trains (London) | London Transport | |||
Virgin acceptance of Silverlink tickets London-Bham | London Transport |