Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28.01.10 21:59, Paul Corfield wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:24:00 +0000, " wrote: On 28.01.10 14:51, martin wrote: on BBC London News this lunchtime: "Transport for London (TfL) has been called "stingy" and "Scrooge- like" for imposing a £1 charge on rail passengers using a short-cut through a station." Full story at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e...on/8484960.stm What's the real deal here? Is this just a charge to enter one station and exit another, or if I got the Jubilee to Southwark and exited through an exit at Waterloo East, would I be charged an extra quid? (I've never used Waterloo East, and think I've only been to Southwark once, so I'm not clear on the layout of the station or this 'expensive' corridor.) I remember platform tickets a while ago. IIRC, they cost 40p. Are they no longer available or is there not such a facility with Oyster if it is not done within a few minutes? Yes they still exist - they cost £1 as in this case. There is no facility with Oyster as I understand it for platform tickets. I think there is something set up if someone enters, changes their mind and then exits within a short time at the same station. I don't know what happens and nothing I've read recently explains it. I have a vague recollection of posts on the group about this a number of months ago. But I did that once with my Oyster. I entered the station for not more than a couple of minutes, then exited again. But I was still charged £1.60. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jan 28, 5:33*pm, Paul Corfield wrote: On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:51:38 -0800 (PST), martin wrote: on BBC London News this lunchtime: "Transport for London (TfL) has been called "stingy" and "Scrooge- like" for imposing a £1 charge on rail passengers using a short-cut through a station." Full story at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e...on/8484960.stm What's the real deal here? Is this just a charge to enter one station and exit another, or if I got the Jubilee to Southwark and exited through an exit at Waterloo East, would I be charged an extra quid? (I've never used Waterloo East, and think I've only been to Southwark once, so I'm not clear on the layout of the station or this 'expensive' corridor.) I'm not entirely clear what is going on here but one factor to bear in mind is that South Eastern have recently gated Waterloo East thus creating the situation of a no man's land between their new exit gateline (at what is the eastern end of their station) and the entry gateline at the western end of LU's Southwark Station. Therefore it is now possible to be marooned between two gatelines with no exit to the street (as such an exit was never constructed). *Quite how that situation was allowed to arise I do not know nor how it was ever approved on safety grounds. AIUI there's no exit to the street for planning consent reasons. I presume the safety issue is predominantly that of effectively managing heavy crowds, yes? I can certainly see the potential issue there, what with two independent gatelines under the responsibility of two different sets of staff, working for different companies. Whether the new gateline has created a need for platform tickets to be required in the LUL station or whether there is a recorded abuse of the old "let them through" attitude I do not know. * I suspect this will run and run given the political pressure sitting behind it - cue lots of Mayor's questions. There used to be a poster or two in the main ticket hall at Southwark tube station (i.e. the one on the corner of The Cut and Blackfriars Road) which stated that gate passes were available for NR season ticket holders, which were IIRC free - said gate passes were to enable them to make use of this shortcut. That was a while back, and when I looked more recently I couldn't find any such notices. I'm therefore wondering if these gate passes, if they were indeed still available, have now been withdrawn - but the article makes no mention of this whatsoever. So I'm tempted to actually think this is a new arrangement put in place because the new Southeastern gates might have made the 'old "let them through" attitude' unworkable - perhaps the SE gates swallow tickets to 'London Terminals', whereas previously there was an informal arrangement whereby pax brandishing NR tickets were let through at both gatelines? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28 Jan, 18:30, Mizter T wrote:
On Jan 28, 5:33*pm, Paul Corfield wrote: On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:51:38 -0800 (PST), martin wrote: on BBC London News this lunchtime: "Transport for London (TfL) has been called "stingy" and "Scrooge- like" for imposing a £1 charge on rail passengers using a short-cut through a station." Full story at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e...on/8484960.stm What's the real deal here? Is this just a charge to enter one station and exit another, or if I got the Jubilee to Southwark and exited through an exit at Waterloo East, would I be charged an extra quid? (I've never used Waterloo East, and think I've only been to Southwark once, so I'm not clear on the layout of the station or this 'expensive' corridor.) I'm not entirely clear what is going on here but one factor to bear in mind is that South Eastern have recently gated Waterloo East thus creating the situation of a no man's land between their new exit gateline (at what is the eastern end of their station) and the entry gateline at the western end of LU's Southwark Station. Therefore it is now possible to be marooned between two gatelines with no exit to the street (as such an exit was never constructed). *Quite how that situation was allowed to arise I do not know nor how it was ever approved on safety grounds. AIUI there's no exit to the street for planning consent reasons. I presume the safety issue is predominantly that of effectively managing heavy crowds, yes? I can certainly see the potential issue there, what with two independent gatelines under the responsibility of two different sets of staff, working for different companies. Whether the new gateline has created a need for platform tickets to be required in the LUL station or whether there is a recorded abuse of the old "let them through" attitude I do not know. * I suspect this will run and run given the political pressure sitting behind it - cue lots of Mayor's questions. There used to be a poster or two in the main ticket hall at Southwark tube station (i.e. the one on the corner of The Cut and Blackfriars Road) which stated that gate passes were available for NR season ticket holders, which were IIRC free - said gate passes were to enable them to make use of this shortcut. That was a while back, and when I looked more recently I couldn't find any such notices. I'm therefore wondering if these gate passes, if they were indeed still available, have now been withdrawn - but the article makes no mention of this whatsoever. So I'm tempted to actually think this is a new arrangement put in place because the new Southeastern gates might have made the 'old "let them through" attitude' unworkable - perhaps the SE gates swallow tickets to 'London Terminals', whereas previously there was an informal arrangement whereby pax brandishing NR tickets were let through at both gatelines? That's quite likely, thinking about it. The new barriers (and others at local stations) take away one emergency option I used to have. That is, when the local queue was too long and/or the local Oyster-selling machine wasn't working and/or I just forgot to renew, the LU ticket window at the bottom of the Waterloo East stairs could do an Oyster travelcard season renewal. (Technically, one journey without a ticket, but no fare evaded in the end.) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
8.5% cut in central govt grant to TfL; suburban West Anglia trainsto be devolved to TfL control | London Transport | |||
London mayor criticised for train driver remarks | London Transport | |||
GBP108 million cut to TfL's transport grant | London Transport | |||
TfL £5Bn short for Crossrail | London Transport | |||
Infraco's criticised again in 3rd annual PPP report | London Transport |