Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
on BBC London News this lunchtime:
"Transport for London (TfL) has been called "stingy" and "Scrooge- like" for imposing a £1 charge on rail passengers using a short-cut through a station." Full story at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e...on/8484960.stm What's the real deal here? Is this just a charge to enter one station and exit another, or if I got the Jubilee to Southwark and exited through an exit at Waterloo East, would I be charged an extra quid? (I've never used Waterloo East, and think I've only been to Southwark once, so I'm not clear on the layout of the station or this 'expensive' corridor.) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"martin" wrote in message
... on BBC London News this lunchtime: "Transport for London (TfL) has been called "stingy" and "Scrooge- like" for imposing a £1 charge on rail passengers using a short-cut through a station." Full story at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e...on/8484960.stm What's the real deal here? Is this just a charge to enter one station and exit another, or if I got the Jubilee to Southwark and exited through an exit at Waterloo East, would I be charged an extra quid? (I've never used Waterloo East, and think I've only been to Southwark once, so I'm not clear on the layout of the station or this 'expensive' corridor.) It is perfectly reasonable for passengers to alight at Waterloo East and want to go to Blackfriars Road, for which the Southwark tube exit is ideal. Walking towards Waterloo and then back again is ridiculous and the fact that this wasn't thought through when the station was opened shows very poor judgement. It is true that the exit for Waterloo East is shown as via Waterloo (and the signs to Southwark just say Jubilee Line), but it still needs sorting out. MaxB |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jan 28, 3:38*pm, "Batman55" wrote: "martin" wrote: on BBC London News this lunchtime: "Transport for London (TfL) has been called "stingy" and "Scrooge- like" for imposing a £1 charge on rail passengers using a short-cut through a station." Full story at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e...on/8484960.stm What's the real deal here? Is this just a charge to enter one station and exit another, or if I got the Jubilee to Southwark and exited through an exit at Waterloo East, would I be charged an extra quid? (I've never used Waterloo East, and think I've only been to Southwark once, so I'm not clear on the layout of the station or this 'expensive' corridor.) ==================== It is perfectly reasonable for passengers to alight at Waterloo East and want to go to Blackfriars Road, for which the Southwark tube exit is ideal. Walking towards Waterloo and then back again is ridiculous and the fact that this wasn't thought through when the station was opened shows very poor judgement. It is true that the exit for Waterloo East is shown as via Waterloo (and the signs to Southwark just say Jubilee Line), but it still needs sorting out. It was thought through though - it was a condition of the planning permission given for Southwark tube station that no new intermediate exit from Waterloo East onto the street be created. Presumably this was done to keep surrounding residential areas quieter. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28 Jan, 16:24, Mizter T wrote:
On Jan 28, 3:38*pm, "Batman55" wrote: "martin" wrote: on BBC London News this lunchtime: "Transport for London (TfL) has been called "stingy" and "Scrooge- like" for imposing a £1 charge on rail passengers using a short-cut through a station." Full story at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e...on/8484960.stm What's the real deal here? Is this just a charge to enter one station and exit another, or if I got the Jubilee to Southwark and exited through an exit at Waterloo East, would I be charged an extra quid? (I've never used Waterloo East, and think I've only been to Southwark once, so I'm not clear on the layout of the station or this 'expensive' corridor.) ==================== It is perfectly reasonable for passengers to alight at Waterloo East and want to go to Blackfriars Road, for which the Southwark tube exit is ideal. Walking towards Waterloo and then back again is ridiculous and the fact that this wasn't thought through when the station was opened shows very poor judgement. It is true that the exit for Waterloo East is shown as via Waterloo (and the signs to Southwark just say Jubilee Line), but it still needs sorting out. It was thought through though - it was a condition of the planning permission given for Southwark tube station that no new intermediate exit from Waterloo East onto the street be created. Presumably this was done to keep surrounding residential areas quieter. Does this condition no longer apply? Or is the £1 platform ticket considered to be sufficient to price off a significant proportion of the people who don't have travelcards? It effectively does provide an exit for anyone with a travelcard, which is a lot of people, and probably the majority of people at the times when it's busiest. It's the obvious route from the south east to TfL's offices, for example ... |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jan 28, 6:23*pm, MIG wrote: On 28 Jan, 16:24, Mizter T wrote: On Jan 28, 3:38*pm, "Batman55" wrote: "martin" wrote: on BBC London News this lunchtime: "Transport for London (TfL) has been called "stingy" and "Scrooge- like" for imposing a £1 charge on rail passengers using a short-cut through a station." Full story at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e...on/8484960.stm What's the real deal here? Is this just a charge to enter one station and exit another, or if I got the Jubilee to Southwark and exited through an exit at Waterloo East, would I be charged an extra quid? (I've never used Waterloo East, and think I've only been to Southwark once, so I'm not clear on the layout of the station or this 'expensive' corridor.) ==================== It is perfectly reasonable for passengers to alight at Waterloo East and want to go to Blackfriars Road, for which the Southwark tube exit is ideal. Walking towards Waterloo and then back again is ridiculous and the fact that this wasn't thought through when the station was opened shows very poor judgement. It is true that the exit for Waterloo East is shown as via Waterloo (and the signs to Southwark just say Jubilee Line), but it still needs sorting out. It was thought through though - it was a condition of the planning permission given for Southwark tube station that no new intermediate exit from Waterloo East onto the street be created. Presumably this was done to keep surrounding residential areas quieter. Does this condition no longer apply? *Or is the £1 platform ticket considered to be sufficient to price off a significant proportion of the people who don't have travelcards? You misunderstand me - AIUI planning permission for the station was conditional on there simply being no new entrance to Waterloo East - there were no associated conditions w.r.t. pax passing through Southwark tube to get to Waterloo, though I suppose the letter of the law might suggest that the (then) new Southwark tube station wasn't to be used for such a purpose. It effectively does provide an exit for anyone with a travelcard, which is a lot of people, and probably the majority of people at the times when it's busiest. *It's the obvious route from the south east to TfL's offices, for example ... Indeed, the Palestra building! But I wouldn't be too quick to leap to conclusions about how many commuters arriving at Waterloo East hold Travelcards - NR-only season tickets can offer significantly savings... e.g Orpington (z6) to London Terminals - £139.10 (monthly) zone 1-6 Travelcard - £182.80 (monthly) All depends on what other travelling that person might be during that month, of course. (And changes in PAYG bus and Tube fares versus the Travelcard price has the potential to shift that calculus on an annual basis!) |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28 Jan, 16:24, Mizter T wrote:
It was thought through though... Do you mind if I keep that sentence? |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:56:00 -0800, Offramp wrote:
On 28 Jan, 16:24, Mizter T wrote: It was thought through though... Do you mind if I keep that sentence? I actually wondered how many times Mizter T looked at it as he wrote the post thinking "I'm sure I've screwed that up somewhere...." |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:38:15 -0000
"Batman55" wrote: It is perfectly reasonable for passengers to alight at Waterloo East and want to go to Blackfriars Road, for which the Southwark tube exit is ideal. If TfL can make some money somewhere they will. This has obviously been hiding under their radar for a while doing no harm whatsoever since the station was built and providing a nice shortcut for commuters. Can't have that now can we? Must get every last penny. I assume its just one new set of gates put in. Hopefully people will just barge through them and with any luck break them. B2003 |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jan 28, 4:37*pm, wrote: On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:38:15 -0000 "Batman55" wrote: It is perfectly reasonable for passengers to alight at Waterloo East and want to go to Blackfriars Road, for which the Southwark tube exit is ideal. If TfL can make some money somewhere they will. This has obviously been hiding under their radar for a while doing no harm whatsoever since the station was built and providing a nice shortcut for commuters. Can't have that now can we? Must get every last penny. I assume its just one new set of gates put in. Hopefully people will just barge through them and with any luck break them. No new gates (see my other posts). Actually it seems possible that LU might have actually opened up this shortcut to people who previously didn't have access to it - the other option being that they've withdrawn the free gate pass previously offered to NR season tickets holders to enable them to use this shortcut. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jan 28, 2:51*pm, martin wrote: on BBC London News this lunchtime: "Transport for London (TfL) has been called "stingy" and "Scrooge- like" for imposing a £1 charge on rail passengers using a short-cut through a station." Full story at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e...on/8484960.stm What's the real deal here? Is this just a charge to enter one station and exit another, or if I got the Jubilee to Southwark and exited through an exit at Waterloo East, would I be charged an extra quid? (I've never used Waterloo East, and think I've only been to Southwark once, so I'm not clear on the layout of the station or this 'expensive' corridor.) To be clear, the story appears to specifically relate to a £1 *paper* "platform ticket" which is required if one wants to use Southwark tube station as a shortcut between Waterloo East and the main entrance of Southwark tube station on the corner of The Cut and Blackfriars Road - what's more, the story says that "Oyster and travelcard users are not charged" - whether that definitely includes Oyster PAYG users is not 100% clear. To understand this, you need to have some knowledge of the geography here. The Waterloo East platforms are accessed via a high walkway from Waterloo mainline station (with an additional entrance to this walkway up several sets of stairs from Sandell Street). This leads one to an overbridge on the western side of the platforms. The station is not gated (at least it wasn't v recently). However, there is also an entrance to Southwark tube station on the eastern ends of the platform. This leads down to the undercroft of the viaduct, which leads on to a hallway where there is a set of gates that gains one access to the tube station, which one gets to by then descending some escalators. This hallway is actually at street level, but there's *no* exit to the street at all - it sits beside and a bit under the southside of the viaduct, between Greet Street and Hatfields (another street). The reason for this is that it was a condition of the planning permission of Southwark tube station that there wasn't a public entrance/exit here - it's a quasi-residential area, so the thinking presumably was to keep it quieter. So, what people do is they use Southwark tube station as a shortcut between the Waterloo East platforms and the main entrance of the tube station on the corner of The Cut and Blackfriars Road, instead of having to walk round the longer way up on to the high walkway and then down to street level and end up backtracking on oneself. If you got the Jubilee to Southwark tube station, you'd find the exit to Waterloo East signed as being for "National Rail ticket holders only" - how PAYG has been implemented on NR at Waterloo East I don't know, i.e. whether one has to touch-out from the Tube through the gates and then touch back in on a standalone reader. However that's ***totally irrelevant*** to this issue - if you're on the Jubilee line and want to go to either Waterloo mainline station or the surrounding area thereof then you get off at Waterloo itself, rather than getting off at Southwark and making a long and unnecessary detour via Waterloo East. *This issue* is about people arriving at Waterloo East who want to get out to Blackfriars Road / The Cut quickly. These are people who'll have tickets issued to "London Terminals" (i.e. not Travelcards). One further thing - LU used to offer a free gate pass for holders of NR season tickets (i.e. issued to "London Terminals") for use at Southwark tube station so they could take advantage of this shortcut - the article is not clear as to whether such a thing is still made available, does anyone know? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
8.5% cut in central govt grant to TfL; suburban West Anglia trainsto be devolved to TfL control | London Transport | |||
London mayor criticised for train driver remarks | London Transport | |||
GBP108 million cut to TfL's transport grant | London Transport | |||
TfL £5Bn short for Crossrail | London Transport | |||
Infraco's criticised again in 3rd annual PPP report | London Transport |