London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 30th 10, 06:26 AM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.transport,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2009
Posts: 27
Default Conflict of Oyster Cards

On Jan 29, 8:23*pm, Matthew Geier
wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:44:17 -0800, CJB wrote:
embarrasment. The culprit was the Hillingdon Community Services card -
which seems to use the same technology as Oyster and was causing a
confict. An irritation 'cos now I have to keep them in separated.


*This is going to start happening more and more as various other
organisations start using non contact smart cards.

*The people who make the 'access control' system at my work have said
they want to replace the mag-strip readers with MiFare Classic readers
and replace all our cards. Oyster is Mifare Class - so the door reader at
work will one day cause any near by Oyster card to respond as well as the
'proper' access card, with the system probably objecting when it gets
responses from two cards instead of one.


The access control suppliers really should move on beyond Mifare
Classic for new smart card installations. OK, the simple hack of
access control systems has attacked those that do not even use the
security functions available with Mifare Classic (they attack schemes
that only read the card serial number), but attackers quickly learn
more. Access control should use Mifare DESFire and AES encryption now,
with provision for Mifare Plus (also in its AES version) later
(because Mifare Plus cards will cost less).
  #2   Report Post  
Old January 30th 10, 09:45 AM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.transport,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2008
Posts: 512
Default Conflict of Oyster Cards

In message
,
ticketyboo writes

The access control suppliers really should move on beyond Mifare
Classic for new smart card installations. OK, the simple hack of
access control systems has attacked those that do not even use the
security functions available with Mifare Classic (they attack schemes
that only read the card serial number), but attackers quickly learn
more. Access control should use Mifare DESFire and AES encryption now,
with provision for Mifare Plus (also in its AES version) later
(because Mifare Plus cards will cost less).


The new Freedom Passes currently being issued use the Desfire 4K
chipset, in order to allow for future ITSO compatability. I gather that
Oyster readers were upgraded to read the new Desfire chip at the end of
last year.

--
Paul Terry
  #3   Report Post  
Old January 30th 10, 04:07 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.transport,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: May 2005
Posts: 6,077
Default Conflict of Oyster Cards


On Jan 30, 10:45*am, Paul Terry wrote:

In message
,
ticketyboo writes

The access control suppliers really should move on beyond Mifare
Classic for new smart card installations. OK, the simple hack of
access control systems has attacked those that do not even use the
security functions available with Mifare Classic (they attack schemes
that only read the card serial number), but attackers quickly learn
more. Access control should use Mifare DESFire and AES encryption now,
with provision for Mifare Plus (also in its AES version) later
(because Mifare Plus cards will cost less).


The new Freedom Passes currently being issued use the Desfire 4K
chipset, in order to allow for future ITSO compatability. I gather that
Oyster readers were upgraded to read the new Desfire chip at the end of
last year.


This presumably was a software/firmware update, as opposed to any
physical modification - the latter would've entailed an enormous
programme of works!
  #4   Report Post  
Old January 30th 10, 05:25 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.transport,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2008
Posts: 512
Default Conflict of Oyster Cards

In message
,
Mizter T writes

On Jan 30, 10:45*am, Paul Terry wrote:


The new Freedom Passes currently being issued use the Desfire 4K
chipset, in order to allow for future ITSO compatability. I gather that
Oyster readers were upgraded to read the new Desfire chip at the end of
last year.


This presumably was a software/firmware update, as opposed to any
physical modification - the latter would've entailed an enormous
programme of works!


I'm not sure. According to the October issue of Freedom Pass News:

"We have had to wait for this opportunity while TfL colleagues amended
their gate and reader network for the new generation cards. So far
approximately 15 Underground/Overground stations have been completed and
approximately 4,000 of the 8,500 bus gate readers have been updated."

This sounds as though the update was more than just a simple data dump
from the central system, but it may have just involved flashing the
firmware in individual readers rather than physical changes, as the
whole process was finished and tested before Christmas.

TfL have also had to supply at least 1.2 million cards for the
changeover, as the old ones cannot be renewed and will all cease to work
on 31st March (as it is a legal requirement for all Concessionary Bus
Travel cards to be ITSO compatible from April).

It seems astonishing that the testing went so smoothly, especially given
that the cards have only a single chip that can hold both Oyster and
ITSO data (two chips on one card was deemed too expensive). But I guess
that the Freedom Pass is a very simple implementation of Oyster, and I
doubt that the ITSO part has been tested at all, given that the only
working ITSO ticket scheme I know of is on Blackpool Borough Council
buses!

--
Paul Terry
  #5   Report Post  
Old January 30th 10, 07:09 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.transport,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Apr 2008
Posts: 22
Default Conflict of Oyster Cards

On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:26:57 -0800, ticketyboo wrote:

On Jan 29, 8:23Â*pm, Matthew Geier
wrote:

Â*The people who make the 'access control' system at my work have said
they want to replace the mag-strip readers with MiFare Classic readers
and replace all our cards.

The access control suppliers really should move on beyond Mifare Classic
for new smart card installations.


I assume they are concerned more with the price of the cards than actual
real security. The current mag cards can be cloned, so can the MiFare
classic, so from that point it's bought nothing. I suspect their main
concern is the maintenance - the mag readers need regular cleaning of the
read heads and wear out and thus need replacing after a time. The cards
wear out from constant swiping. RFID gets rid of a lot of maintenance.
The system is designed around simply reading the serial number of the
card and consulting a database, so they won't be using any of the other
'smart' features either with out a significant redesign of the system.
It's really just a cost cutting exercise.



  #6   Report Post  
Old January 29th 10, 10:08 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.transport,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 529
Default Conflict of Oyster Cards

On Jan 29, 10:44*am, CJB wrote:
Recently I obtained a Hillingdon Community Services card which doubles
as a Library user's card. And put it into the same card wallet as my
Oyster card - in which I also keep my bank card. Suddently my Oyster
card stopped working on trains and buses, and even the Heathrow
Connect portable validators wouldn't recognise it - to considerable
embarrasment. The culprit was the Hillingdon Community Services card -
which seems to use the same technology as Oyster and was causing a
confict. An irritation 'cos now I have to keep them in separated. CJB.


And if you bothered to read the user information when you got the
oyster card it tells to do EXACTLY that - keep it away from other
cards.

--
Nick
  #7   Report Post  
Old January 30th 10, 08:47 AM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.transport,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jan 2010
Posts: 3
Default Conflict of Oyster Cards

And if you bothered to read the user information when you got the
oyster card it tells to do EXACTLY that - keep it away from other
cards.

Oh - so that's all right then. Thank goodness the customer is at fault for
having only one wallet.

--
Peter 'Prof' Fox
Multitude of things for beer, cycling, Morris and curiosities at
http://vulpeculox.net



  #8   Report Post  
Old January 31st 10, 11:02 AM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.transport,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 376
Default Conflict of Oyster Cards

On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:08:26 -0800 (PST) someone who may be D7666
wrote this:-

And if you bothered to read the user information when you got the
oyster card it tells to do EXACTLY that - keep it away from other
cards.


I don't recall any information being provided with the cards our
group got in December, we bought 25-30 of the things. However, they
are not the ones one has to leak personal information to Boris for.



--
David Hansen, Edinburgh
I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000...#pt3-pb3-l1g54
  #9   Report Post  
Old January 30th 10, 08:47 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.transport,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,188
Default Conflict of Oyster Cards

On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, CJB wrote:

Recently I obtained a Hillingdon Community Services card which doubles
as a Library user's card. And put it into the same card wallet as my
Oyster card - in which I also keep my bank card. Suddently my Oyster
card stopped working on trains and buses, and even the Heathrow Connect
portable validators wouldn't recognise it - to considerable
embarrasment. The culprit was the Hillingdon Community Services card -
which seems to use the same technology as Oyster and was causing a
confict. An irritation 'cos now I have to keep them in separated. CJB.


My entry card at UCL was the same. I asked my building manager about it,
and he said that it was okay if i tapped my Oyster on the building reader,
as long as i remembered to touch out later. He had a *very* good straight
face.

tom

--
I know thats not really relevant but I've just typed the words and my
backspace key doesn't work. -- phorenzik
  #10   Report Post  
Old February 1st 10, 04:44 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.transport,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Feb 2010
Posts: 1
Default Conflict of Oyster Cards

Tom Anderson wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, CJB wrote:

Recently I obtained a Hillingdon Community Services card which doubles
as a Library user's card. And put it into the same card wallet as my
Oyster card - in which I also keep my bank card. Suddently my Oyster
card stopped working on trains and buses, and even the Heathrow
Connect portable validators wouldn't recognise it - to considerable
embarrasment. The culprit was the Hillingdon Community Services card -
which seems to use the same technology as Oyster and was causing a
confict. An irritation 'cos now I have to keep them in separated. CJB.


My entry card at UCL was the same. I asked my building manager about it,
and he said that it was okay if i tapped my Oyster on the building
reader, as long as i remembered to touch out later. He had a *very* good
straight face.


Hmmm... I wonder if my Highland Council entitlement card would get me
into UCL then. Evil Grin...
--

I'm not apathetic... I just don't give a sh** anymore

?John Wright



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Oyster Cards damaged by proximity door entry cards neill London Transport 5 March 24th 12 06:28 PM
Conflict of Oyster Cards Paul Cummins[_3_] London Transport 2 February 9th 10 07:21 PM
Conflict of Oyster Cards [email protected] London Transport 0 February 6th 10 10:35 PM
Security of Oyster Cards Matthew London Transport 44 November 26th 03 07:22 AM
Ticket Gates & Oyster Cards Joe Patrick London Transport 25 September 1st 03 10:44 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017