Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Recliner wrote:
"Tim Fardell" wrote in message On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Mizter T wrote: On Feb 12, 2:11 pm, Tim Fardell tim.fardell.all-your- wrote: On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Recliner wrote: [snip] How do you know your Tube station exit wasn't picked up? The on-line Web pages aften have gaps, but ticket machines will show you the full history. So, even though the history shown online may be incomplete, you won't necessarily have been overcharged. Ah-ha! I think you're right - it's just that the 'Exit' events have not shown up on the Web history. I spoke to the Oyster helpline, and they said they can see that both journeys were completed correctly and I have not been overcharged. He's sending me a full statement to confirm it, but it certainly sounds like the Web history is just missing the exit events. At least I now know not to trust the journey history on the web. Thanks :-) How long ago was this?The online journey history does have a tendency to lag somewhat. One was last Saturday (6th Feb) and the other was way back on January 22nd. The first one back in January I initially attributed to incompetence on my part, but when it happened again at the same station I began to smell a rat. Hence I've only just raised it. But it seems all is well anyway. I've found that the apparent gaps can stay indefinitely, but an event such as topping up the card or reading it on a ticket machine sometimes seems to correct the online history. It's almost as if the data is sitting waiting in cache somewhere, but doesn't get written to the online database until some event causes the cache to clear. But the credit on the card always seems to be correct. Having received the postal statement, I can see that both journeys were recorded and charged correctly, but the gaps are still there in the Web site display. In both cases, 'exit' events at Kings X are not shown on the Web, but are shown on the postal statement. However, the card balance is shown correctly in both places. It seems that the Web journey history is indeed not reliable, which seems very weird to me as I would assume it is based on the same data. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tim Fardell" wrote in
message On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Recliner wrote: I've found that the apparent gaps can stay indefinitely, but an event such as topping up the card or reading it on a ticket machine sometimes seems to correct the online history. It's almost as if the data is sitting waiting in cache somewhere, but doesn't get written to the online database until some event causes the cache to clear. But the credit on the card always seems to be correct. Having received the postal statement, I can see that both journeys were recorded and charged correctly, but the gaps are still there in the Web site display. In both cases, 'exit' events at Kings X are not shown on the Web, but are shown on the postal statement. However, the card balance is shown correctly in both places. It seems that the Web journey history is indeed not reliable, which seems very weird to me as I would assume it is based on the same data. I think 'based on' is the key phrase. The Web reports seem to be based on an incomplete/late copy of the original database. But, as I have found, you seem to be able to force an update by, for example, topping up the PaYG balance. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Overcrowding at Kings Cross St Pancras | London Transport | |||
Why not Kings Cross AND St. Pancras? | London Transport | |||
Kings Cross or St Pancras? Eurostar started already? | London Transport | |||
Congestion at Kings Cross/St Pancras | London Transport | |||
New Kings Cross/St Pancras ticket halls - any images online? | London Transport |