Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 15, 9:22*pm, Martin Petrov
wrote: Is it possible that the improved timetable from later this month was reliant on having some of the extra units in place. The fleet will be growing from 6 x 2 car class 150s to 8 x 2 car class 172s. Even simple replacement of class 150s with class 172s may give an increase in capacity due to the longer vehicles (although there will be less seating due to the 2+2 arrangement). Running more than a twenty minute frequency looks difficult with the existing fleet size. I don't think it did need more trains overall. The 15 minute interval was only at the height of the peak. I think either the user group or London Travelwatch showed a while back that you could create such a timetable with adequate turnaround time to cater for the worst of the peak with the existing fleet. I remember reading a document that set out the scheduling and pathing issues. Out of interest, what is it that's restricting the GOBLIN to 2 car operation? I live in Leyton and get the train every so often between here and Crouch Hill (and would have used it much more often since moving here, but for the weekend closures....) and most if not all of the intermediate stations could easily deal with longer trains? I think the only short platform is the eastbound at South Tottenham, so other than that, I think it is just unit availability. There may be a couple of other locations which would need work for a 4 car class 172 train to fit due to the longer vehicles. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message ,
writes I thought there was no way to lengthen the South Tottenham platform due to junctions close by? Although tight, it should be possible - it was only about 15 years ago that the platforms were shortened to two-car length (because of subsidence). The following gives an idea of the original platform lengths: http://www.flickr.com/photos/10793813@N07/2038047821/ The section of the far platform with the inset fence (where the two kids are standing) was entirely removed, and I think it was also shortened at the other end as well. It seems quite incredible that a short-sighted decision to reduce the platforms at S. Tottenham in relatively recent times is now almost the only reason why LO can't run the much-needed 3-car sets on the GOBLIN. -- Paul Terry |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Terry wrote:
It seems quite incredible that a short-sighted decision to reduce the platforms at S. Tottenham in relatively recent times is now almost the only reason why LO can't run the much-needed 3-car sets on the GOBLIN. Don't some of the other station platforms need work to reactivate the full length? The unused section at Wanstead Park is rather decayed. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Casual User BorisBikes from 20101203 and CC Auto Pay from 20110104 | London Transport | |||
NEW GROUP - Eco Friendly low carbon executive cars chauffeur services to be designed for and with the Business Community - we seek your views - contact the group or new website today... | London Transport | |||
DfT Working Group Report on the Crossrail Timetable | London Transport | |||
Two separate user databases at the Oyster website? | London Transport | |||
Kiley wants road user charging in London | London Transport |