Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 6, 9:29*am, Bruce wrote:
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 01:10:27 +0000, Charles Ellson wrote: On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:11:04 -0800 (PST), Jamie *Thompson wrote: In all fairness, Vernney Junction was, is, and probably always will be a field, so building a *new* curve from the Oxford-Bedford line to the route through Buckingham (running via Calvert) wouldn't exactly be difficult. The line from Vernney Junction to Quainton road doesn't appear to have anything but a few scattered dwellings anywhere near it anyway. On a tangent...I do wonder why the Buckingham Railway Centre never bothered trying to rebuild the line north so they'd have somewhere to run their rolling stock. Leaving aside the money Why leave it aside? *It is the over-riding issue. From its earliest days, the Buckinghamshire Railway Centre has had the greatest difficulty raising funds to keep its operation going, let alone to expand. * The Centre flatters to deceive. *The rebuilding of the Rewley Road station building, courtesy of a Lottery grant, gave Quainton Road an outstanding asset. *However, that asset is slightly out of place in a ramshackle operation that has always been run on a shoestring. Its location is at the root of the problem. *The area is thinly populated meaning that people have to travel from further away. * The transport links that most people actually want to use to access railway preservation centres (called *roads*) are poor. * The centre doesn't have a reputation for anything in particular and is home to several disparate groups of enthusiasts rather than having one coherent strategy. *One could point to an overall lack of direction but in truth there are many different directions, some of which can conflict with others. Buckinghamshire Railway Centre has weathered several financial crises over the years. *The current poor state of the economy means that survival must be their primary objective - or their sole objective. * There isn't any money available for grandiose schemes. *There never has been, except of course the Lottery grant for the station building which, as I said, gives a false impression of the Centre. * Dreaming about re-opening to Buckingham would have been a distraction from the business of survival. *It was never going to happen. Fair enough. Transport links to the centre will probably improve if the Chiltern service to MK comes about though, and they'll have to see how things go. That said, the A41's a pretty good road that runs nearby (aside from going through central Aylesbury), so transport links aren't that bad. I base my comments on having a running line being useful on the *relative* success of the Bluebell and Great Central organisations, that's all. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Chiltern Chairman Challenge Evergreen 4 - send your suggestionsto Captain Deltic! | London Transport | |||
Chiltern Chairman Challenge Evergreen 4 - send your suggestionsto Captain Deltic! | London Transport | |||
Chiltern Chairman Challenge Evergreen 4 - send your suggestionsto Captain Deltic! | London Transport | |||
DLR Train Captain Texting Whilst 'Driving' | London Transport | |||
Evergreen 2 | London Transport |