Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 06/05/2010 11:44, Clive Page wrote:
I made a small diversion on a journey yesterday and used the East London Line from New Cross Gate to Whitechapel. At other stations south of New Cross Gate, e.g. Brockley, were marked with London Overground branding, even though they don't yet have the trains. But at New Cross Gate, even though it does have the trains, there were no signs evident at all. Having arrived on the slow up platform I assumed that I had to go up the steps to the main station level, but then there was no indication at all of ELL/Overground services. The next departure was (I later found out) in 10 minutes, but did not show on the main departures board. A helpful man at the ticket gates told me to go to Platform 1. On platform 1 there was a new ELL train but no indication of destination on the platform, or on the train itself. Boarding passengers mostly asked those on the train whether it was going to Dalston. Indeed the signage at New Cross Gate is rather lacking and there is some lack of communication too. I used it for the first time a couple of days ago, only as far as Canada Water, on my return journey about 3.30 pm I got up to the platform at Canada Water, a New Cross was due in and arrived, the New Cross Gate was ticking down on the indicator, and some minutes late it came through out of service, no announcements though. After another New Cross arrived some minutes late with yet another New Cross Gate apparently 2 minutes behind it I asked the only member of staff in sight whether it was worth waiting, he said there had been disruption and that the approaching one was the first to the Gate for 3 hours. Well, it came in and was ok, but the lack of announcements was really a bit slack. Presumably when the through services are running the up services will use platform 5 and the flyover. About 9 minutes later, i.e. about a minute before departure, the on-train signs lit up showing Dalston. It's good that they leave the waiting train open for passengers to board and get a seat, but not good that their passenger information systems are so completely useless. Several of the refurbished stations have nice murals or reproductions of old photos on the walls - when I have more time I might be inclined to get off and study them. I changed to the District Line at Whitechapel - the signs directing you to the platforms for the east and westbound services are ok, but once on the appropriate platform the was no indication of which platform face the next train would leave from, or whether District or Hammersmith line. The platform had what I think was one of the old-style blinds with cut-outs of destinations over a set of fluorescent tubes (don't know that they are called). Whatever it was it didn't function, and I checked both sides. Fortunately a train came in with Richmond on the front. Nothing on the destination board throughout, no audible announcements at any time. Whitechapel has always been like that, but as a general rule the westbound trains always use the 2 platforms nearest the booking hall, sorry I cannot remember the numbering right now, that is the subway on the left downstairs. But getting the H & C can be very chancy, like NXG lack of decent signage and information, but did you notice the old unused sign over the stairs saying Metropolitan Line... Now that Whitechapel is again a fairly important interchange station, it's about time TfL put in working destination boards. -- Martin replies to newsgroup only please. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 6, 6:10*pm, Martin Smith wrote:
On 06/05/2010 11:44, Clive Page wrote: I made a small diversion on a journey yesterday and used the East London Line from New Cross Gate to Whitechapel. At other stations south of New Cross Gate, e.g. Brockley, were marked with London Overground branding, even though they don't yet have the trains. But at New Cross Gate, even though it does have the trains, there were no signs evident at all. Having arrived on the slow up platform I assumed that I had to go up the steps to the main station level, but then there was no indication at all of ELL/Overground services. The next departure was (I later found out) in 10 minutes, but did not show on the main departures board. A helpful man at the ticket gates told me to go to Platform 1. On platform 1 there was a new ELL train but no indication of destination on the platform, or on the train itself. Boarding passengers mostly asked those on the train whether it was going to Dalston. Indeed the signage at New Cross Gate is rather lacking and there is some lack of communication too. I used it for the first time a couple of days ago, only as far as Canada Water, on my return journey about 3.30 pm I got up to the platform at Canada Water, a New Cross was due in and arrived, the New Cross Gate was ticking down on the indicator, and some minutes late it came through out of service, no announcements though. After another New Cross arrived some minutes late with yet another New Cross Gate apparently 2 minutes behind it I asked the only member of staff in sight whether it was worth waiting, he said there had been disruption and that the approaching one was the first to the Gate for 3 hours. Well, it came in and was ok, but the lack of announcements was really a bit slack. Presumably when the through services are running the up services will use platform 5 and the flyover. About 9 minutes later, i.e. about a minute before departure, the on-train signs lit up showing Dalston. It's good that they leave the waiting train open for passengers to board and get a seat, but not good that their passenger information systems are so completely useless. Several of the refurbished stations have nice murals or reproductions of old photos on the walls - when I have more time I might be inclined to get off and study them. I changed to the District Line at Whitechapel - the signs directing you to the platforms for the east and westbound services are ok, but once on the appropriate platform the was no indication of which platform face the next train would leave from, or whether District or Hammersmith line. The platform had what I think was one of the old-style blinds with cut-outs of destinations over a set of fluorescent tubes (don't know that they are called). Whatever it was it didn't function, and I checked both sides. Fortunately a train came in with Richmond on the front. Nothing on the destination board throughout, no audible announcements at any time. Whitechapel has always been like that, but as a general rule the westbound trains always use the 2 platforms nearest the booking hall, sorry I cannot remember the numbering right now, that is the subway on the left downstairs. But getting the H & C can be very chancy, like NXG lack of decent signage and information, but did you notice the old unused sign over the stairs saying Metropolitan Line... Now that Whitechapel is again a fairly important interchange station, it's about time TfL put in working destination boards. -- Martin replies to newsgroup only please. There is one solitary Overground sign at New Cross Gate: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...rgr ound).jpg I didn't notice new signs at Brockley - did you mean Honor Oak Park? Also seen them at Sydenham, Penge West and Anerley. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6 May, 19:13, "Dr. Sunil" wrote:
On May 6, 6:10*pm, Martin Smith wrote: On 06/05/2010 11:44, Clive Page wrote: I made a small diversion on a journey yesterday and used the East London Line from New Cross Gate to Whitechapel. At other stations south of New Cross Gate, e.g. Brockley, were marked with London Overground branding, even though they don't yet have the trains. But at New Cross Gate, even though it does have the trains, there were no signs evident at all. Having arrived on the slow up platform I assumed that I had to go up the steps to the main station level, but then there was no indication at all of ELL/Overground services. The next departure was (I later found out) in 10 minutes, but did not show on the main departures board. A helpful man at the ticket gates told me to go to Platform 1. On platform 1 there was a new ELL train but no indication of destination on the platform, or on the train itself. Boarding passengers mostly asked those on the train whether it was going to Dalston. Indeed the signage at New Cross Gate is rather lacking and there is some lack of communication too. I used it for the first time a couple of days ago, only as far as Canada Water, on my return journey about 3.30 pm I got up to the platform at Canada Water, a New Cross was due in and arrived, the New Cross Gate was ticking down on the indicator, and some minutes late it came through out of service, no announcements though. After another New Cross arrived some minutes late with yet another New Cross Gate apparently 2 minutes behind it I asked the only member of staff in sight whether it was worth waiting, he said there had been disruption and that the approaching one was the first to the Gate for 3 hours. Well, it came in and was ok, but the lack of announcements was really a bit slack. Presumably when the through services are running the up services will use platform 5 and the flyover. About 9 minutes later, i.e. about a minute before departure, the on-train signs lit up showing Dalston. It's good that they leave the waiting train open for passengers to board and get a seat, but not good that their passenger information systems are so completely useless. Several of the refurbished stations have nice murals or reproductions of old photos on the walls - when I have more time I might be inclined to get off and study them. I changed to the District Line at Whitechapel - the signs directing you to the platforms for the east and westbound services are ok, but once on the appropriate platform the was no indication of which platform face the next train would leave from, or whether District or Hammersmith line. The platform had what I think was one of the old-style blinds with cut-outs of destinations over a set of fluorescent tubes (don't know that they are called). Whatever it was it didn't function, and I checked both sides. Fortunately a train came in with Richmond on the front. Nothing on the destination board throughout, no audible announcements at any time. Whitechapel has always been like that, but as a general rule the westbound trains always use the 2 platforms nearest the booking hall, sorry I cannot remember the numbering right now, that is the subway on the left downstairs. But getting the H & C can be very chancy, like NXG lack of decent signage and information, but did you notice the old unused sign over the stairs saying Metropolitan Line... Now that Whitechapel is again a fairly important interchange station, it's about time TfL put in working destination boards. -- Martin replies to newsgroup only please. There is one solitary Overground sign at New Cross Gate: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...tation_signage... I didn't notice new signs at Brockley - did you mean Honor Oak Park? Also seen them at Sydenham, Penge West and Anerley. They now seem to have appeared at Brockley, but not at Forest Hill. Also the New Cross Gate signs have changed to the standard type seen at stations south of the http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...gnage_2010.JPG |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14 May, 16:06, "Dr. Sunil" wrote:
On 6 May, 19:13, "Dr. Sunil" wrote: On May 6, 6:10*pm, Martin Smith wrote: On 06/05/2010 11:44, Clive Page wrote: I made a small diversion on a journey yesterday and used the East London Line from New Cross Gate to Whitechapel. At other stations south of New Cross Gate, e.g. Brockley, were marked with London Overground branding, even though they don't yet have the trains. But at New Cross Gate, even though it does have the trains, there were no signs evident at all. Having arrived on the slow up platform I assumed that I had to go up the steps to the main station level, but then there was no indication at all of ELL/Overground services. The next departure was (I later found out) in 10 minutes, but did not show on the main departures board. A helpful man at the ticket gates told me to go to Platform 1. On platform 1 there was a new ELL train but no indication of destination on the platform, or on the train itself. Boarding passengers mostly asked those on the train whether it was going to Dalston. Indeed the signage at New Cross Gate is rather lacking and there is some lack of communication too. I used it for the first time a couple of days ago, only as far as Canada Water, on my return journey about 3.30 pm I got up to the platform at Canada Water, a New Cross was due in and arrived, the New Cross Gate was ticking down on the indicator, and some minutes late it came through out of service, no announcements though. After another New Cross arrived some minutes late with yet another New Cross Gate apparently 2 minutes behind it I asked the only member of staff in sight whether it was worth waiting, he said there had been disruption and that the approaching one was the first to the Gate for 3 hours. Well, it came in and was ok, but the lack of announcements was really a bit slack. Presumably when the through services are running the up services will use platform 5 and the flyover. About 9 minutes later, i.e. about a minute before departure, the on-train signs lit up showing Dalston. It's good that they leave the waiting train open for passengers to board and get a seat, but not good that their passenger information systems are so completely useless. Several of the refurbished stations have nice murals or reproductions of old photos on the walls - when I have more time I might be inclined to get off and study them. I changed to the District Line at Whitechapel - the signs directing you to the platforms for the east and westbound services are ok, but once on the appropriate platform the was no indication of which platform face the next train would leave from, or whether District or Hammersmith line. The platform had what I think was one of the old-style blinds with cut-outs of destinations over a set of fluorescent tubes (don't know that they are called). Whatever it was it didn't function, and I checked both sides. Fortunately a train came in with Richmond on the front. Nothing on the destination board throughout, no audible announcements at any time. Whitechapel has always been like that, but as a general rule the westbound trains always use the 2 platforms nearest the booking hall, sorry I cannot remember the numbering right now, that is the subway on the left downstairs. But getting the H & C can be very chancy, like NXG lack of decent signage and information, but did you notice the old unused sign over the stairs saying Metropolitan Line... Now that Whitechapel is again a fairly important interchange station, it's about time TfL put in working destination boards. -- Martin replies to newsgroup only please. There is one solitary Overground sign at New Cross Gate: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...tation_signage... I didn't notice new signs at Brockley - did you mean Honor Oak Park? Also seen them at Sydenham, Penge West and Anerley. They now seem to have appeared at Brockley, but not at Forest Hill. Also the New Cross Gate signs have changed to the standard type seen at stations south of the http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...tn_signage_201... Forest Hill seems to be the only station lacking Overground platform signage. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 May, 16:26, "Dr. Sunil" wrote:
On 14 May, 16:06, "Dr. Sunil" wrote: On 6 May, 19:13, "Dr. Sunil" wrote: On May 6, 6:10*pm, Martin Smith wrote: On 06/05/2010 11:44, Clive Page wrote: I made a small diversion on a journey yesterday and used the East London Line from New Cross Gate to Whitechapel. At other stations south of New Cross Gate, e.g. Brockley, were marked with London Overground branding, even though they don't yet have the trains. But at New Cross Gate, even though it does have the trains, there were no signs evident at all. Having arrived on the slow up platform I assumed that I had to go up the steps to the main station level, but then there was no indication at all of ELL/Overground services. The next departure was (I later found out) in 10 minutes, but did not show on the main departures board. A helpful man at the ticket gates told me to go to Platform 1. On platform 1 there was a new ELL train but no indication of destination on the platform, or on the train itself. Boarding passengers mostly asked those on the train whether it was going to Dalston. Indeed the signage at New Cross Gate is rather lacking and there is some lack of communication too. I used it for the first time a couple of days ago, only as far as Canada Water, on my return journey about 3.30 pm I got up to the platform at Canada Water, a New Cross was due in and arrived, the New Cross Gate was ticking down on the indicator, and some minutes late it came through out of service, no announcements though. After another New Cross arrived some minutes late with yet another New Cross Gate apparently 2 minutes behind it I asked the only member of staff in sight whether it was worth waiting, he said there had been disruption and that the approaching one was the first to the Gate for 3 hours. Well, it came in and was ok, but the lack of announcements was really a bit slack. Presumably when the through services are running the up services will use platform 5 and the flyover. About 9 minutes later, i.e. about a minute before departure, the on-train signs lit up showing Dalston. It's good that they leave the waiting train open for passengers to board and get a seat, but not good that their passenger information systems are so completely useless. Several of the refurbished stations have nice murals or reproductions of old photos on the walls - when I have more time I might be inclined to get off and study them. I changed to the District Line at Whitechapel - the signs directing you to the platforms for the east and westbound services are ok, but once on the appropriate platform the was no indication of which platform face the next train would leave from, or whether District or Hammersmith line. The platform had what I think was one of the old-style blinds with cut-outs of destinations over a set of fluorescent tubes (don't know that they are called). Whatever it was it didn't function, and I checked both sides. Fortunately a train came in with Richmond on the front. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On May 14, 4:06*pm, "Dr. Sunil" wrote: On 6 May, 19:13, "Dr. Sunil" wrote: [snip] There is one solitary Overground sign at New Cross Gate: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...rgr ound).jpg I didn't notice new signs at Brockley - did you mean Honor Oak Park? Also seen them at Sydenham, Penge West and Anerley. They now seem to have appeared at Brockley, but not at Forest Hill. Also the New Cross Gate signs have changed to the standard type seen at stations south of the http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...gnage_2010.jpg All this 'new' LO station name signage involves is just vinyl stickers stuck on to the pre-existing signs. Seems a bit of a waste as all the green Southern signs that are being covered up are pretty new, and they're all high quality baked enamel things too. Southern could have saved themselves a few bob by omitting these stations from the replacement program, but then again I suppose that might not have looked too good on their part (especially as they wanted to retain the franchise at that point, plus they were generally overhauling their whole image). |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mizter T wrote:
On May 14, 4:06 pm, "Dr. Sunil" wrote: Also the New Cross Gate signs have changed to the standard type seen at stations south of the http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...gnage_2010.jpg All this 'new' LO station name signage involves is just vinyl stickers stuck on to the pre-existing signs. As per the NLL, this is just the temporary phase - the proper LO platform roundels (LU like) or the alternative 'white with orange border' signs (as seen at Clapham Junction or Stratford island platforms) will probably not be fitted for a while yet. Paul S |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 May, 17:41, "Paul Scott" wrote:
Mizter T wrote: On May 14, 4:06 pm, "Dr. Sunil" wrote: Also the New Cross Gate signs have changed to the standard type seen at stations south of the http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...tn_signage_201.... All this 'new' LO station name signage involves is just vinyl stickers stuck on to the pre-existing signs. As per the NLL, this is just the temporary phase - the proper LO platform roundels (LU like) or the alternative 'white with orange border' signs (as seen at Clapham Junction or Stratford island platforms) *will probably not be fitted for a while yet. Paul S Do you mean this type? http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index..._signag e.jpg Because the one example in this style at NXG was replaced with the black/orange style! |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On May 20, 3:00*pm, "Dr. Sunil" wrote: On 19 May, 17:41, "Paul Scott" wrote: Mizter T wrote: On May 14, 4:06 pm, "Dr. Sunil" wrote: Also the New Cross Gate signs have changed to the standard type seen at stations south of the http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...gnage_2010.JPG All this 'new' LO station name signage involves is just vinyl stickers stuck on to the pre-existing signs. As per the NLL, this is just the temporary phase - the proper LO platform roundels (LU like) or the alternative 'white with orange border' signs (as seen at Clapham Junction or Stratford island platforms) *will probably not be fitted for a while yet. Paul S Do you mean this type? http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index..._signag e.jpg He does I think, yes. See these examples from Clapham Jn: http://www.flickr.com/photos/24772733@N05/2918681993/ and http://www.flickr.com/photos/24772733@N05/2918694477/ Must admit I'm not entirely au fait with the logic of having temporary sign styles which are then replaced with a different permanent style at a later date - though I think it's to do with whether stations are up to the requisite LO standard is it not? Because the one example in this style at NXG was replaced with the black/orange style! Though that one example was nowt other than a vinyl sticker stuck over the old (but not old really) green Southern nameboard, which was still quite visible in the photo you linked to earlier: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...rgr ound).jpg |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why don't tube staff enforce the routing systems in stations? | London Transport | |||
Delivering an 'Intelligent Transport Systems' | London Transport | |||
coffee mugs of other european subway systems | London Transport | |||
Crossrail a poor buy? | London Transport | |||
UK subway systems | London Transport |