Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greetings
Boris published his new Transport Strategy yesterday at City Hall. He was apparently on good form - but that was before news that the LibDems were talking to Labour. The full set of docs is he http://www.london.gov.uk/publication...sport-strategy I'm going through it at what can best be described as a steady pace - a first fast skim didn't persuade me to postpone an early to bed night. In my journalistic days the code words were "much-heralded" meaning "not much new, you've heard it all before in the leaks and drafts". But I'm sure our crack kremlinologists [borisologists? kulveerologists?] will find much of interest in the fine detail. Haven't found much on the river, so far - except that Boris is now on record to improve pier signage. Everything else seems to be either "much heralded" or no more than the existing wish list of topics for TfL to look at. But I could be wrong. TAFN Ken -- Writer / editor on London's River |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bearded wrote:
But I'm sure our crack kremlinologists [borisologists? kulveerologists?] will find much of interest in the fine detail. Was out last night so haven't had a chance, but the initial standouts from other reactions seem to be: a) the consultation had very little effect on the draft, which is mostly as it stands in the final version - this has annoyed a lot of people b) Boris is moving towards the idea of big fixed road links in the east, which he previously campaigned against - one of my Boris Predictions is that he'll support constructing part of the old Ringways scheme, which the Thames Gateway Bridge is the most obvious candidate c) relaxation of rules on new roadbuilding is one of those little timebombs that never gets any attention - it's apparently in the London Plan too (something like removing the requirement for new roads to support specific regeneration, opening the way to building roads purely for congestion relief, which is obviously idiotic). d) WEZ scrapping and LEZ 3 postponement going ahead regardless of the fact that they go totally against the stated policy, which does rather make one question the whole thing. e) there's nothing about the Thames Estuary Airport, despite this being hailed in various quarters as Boris's Big Transport Scheme. That's dead then. What's also noteworthy is that the Strategy legally has to have regard for national priorities which in the current climate is impossible to verify since we don't know what those will be next week. Boris did take the opportunity yesterday to tell the Conservatives that they were fully committed to Crossrail, which, as far as I'm aware, they aren't, actually. Tom |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Val Shawcross deputy mayor for transport | London Transport | |||
Val Shawcross deputy mayor for transport | London Transport | |||
Mayor's transport strategy | London Transport | |||
Network RUS - electrification strategy - consultation draft | London Transport | |||
Mayor welcomes transport plans for Kingston | London Transport News |