Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 20 May 2010 18:17:19 +0100, Ivor The Engine
wrote: On Thu, 20 May 2010 17:43:12 +0100, "Paul Scott" wrote: Mods applied for Sunday's ELL opening http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloa...d-tube-map.pdf I still don't get the 'interchange' link between Dalston Junction and Dalston Kingsland. Is there a practical link or do you have to exit on to Dalston Lane or Kingsland Road respectively then cross two busy roads to get to the other station? Without knowing the stations involved, I interpreted it as meaning that Dalston Junction was (wheelchair) accessible and Dalston Kingsland was not. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 24 May 2010 21:16:56 +0100, Scott
wrote: Without knowing the stations involved, I interpreted it as meaning that Dalston Junction was (wheelchair) accessible and Dalston Kingsland was not. No, there are two different symbols. The wheelchair symbol indicates that Dalston Junction has step-free access; The linked discs indicate an interchange with another line - look at Shadwell or Kings Cross for examples where interchange is at the same station, there are lots more. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 24 May 2010 23:56:51 +0100, Ivor The Engine
wrote: On Mon, 24 May 2010 21:16:56 +0100, Scott wrote: Without knowing the stations involved, I interpreted it as meaning that Dalston Junction was (wheelchair) accessible and Dalston Kingsland was not. No, there are two different symbols. The wheelchair symbol indicates that Dalston Junction has step-free access; The linked discs indicate an interchange with another line - look at Shadwell or Kings Cross for examples where interchange is at the same station, there are lots more. But does the lack of wheelchair symbol on the other line not indicate that only the ELL station has wheelchair access? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 25 May 2010 00:37:46 +0100, Scott
wrote: But does the lack of wheelchair symbol on the other line not indicate that only the ELL station has wheelchair access? It's not 'wheelchair access', it's 'step-free access'. People with limited mobility also appreciate knowing they don't have to climb stairs. What you say is correct, but that stands for every other station on the map without the symbol. The two stations are not physically linked to one another, you have to exit one and cross a road to get to the other, making it less of an interchange than it appears to be from the map. If travelling on Oyster, you would have to touch out and touch in, potentially charging you for two journeys (unless the system can recognise that?) |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On May 25, 10:21*am, Ivor The Engine wrote: On Tue, 25 May 2010 00:37:46 +0100, Scott wrote: But does the lack of wheelchair symbol on the other line not indicate that only the ELL station has wheelchair access? It's not 'wheelchair access', it's 'step-free access'. *People with limited mobility also appreciate knowing they don't have to climb stairs. What you say is correct, but that stands for every other station on the map without the symbol. *The two stations are not physically linked to one another, you have to exit one and cross a road to get to the other, making it less of an interchange than it appears to be from the map. *If travelling on Oyster, you would have to touch out and touch in, potentially charging you for two journeys (unless the system can recognise that?) Yes, the system can recognise that - it's an Out-of-Station Interchange (OSI) - and in the case of the Dalston stations I'm absolutely certain that an OSI will be configured between them. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() If you ignore the wheelchair symbol the Dalston Junction symbol looks the same as the Mile End or Finsbury Park symbols , both of which are cross platform interchanges. I note that Hammersmith has also been changed so that the District and Hammersmith & City stations are joined as one station. I am sure that at one time they were not. Does this show some change in policy on the part of LRT . Is it to indicate that Oyster recognises that travel via those stations is an interchange? The number of circles at the interchanges appear to have no meaning For example Baker Street, which is all one station, has two now, wheras West Hamsptead, which is a Jubilee Line station and an entirely separate North London line station (originally West End Lane) only shows one. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25/05/2010 13:26, Paul Rigg wrote:
If you ignore the wheelchair symbol the Dalston Junction symbol looks the same as the Mile End or Finsbury Park symbols , both of which are cross platform interchanges. I note that Hammersmith has also been changed so that the District and Hammersmith & City stations are joined as one station. I am sure that at one time they were not. Does this show some change in policy on the part of LRT . Is it to indicate that Oyster recognises that travel via those stations is an interchange? I would imagine that Hammersmith coalesced when the wheelchair blobs were introduced. The old system of having one interchange blob separated from the other two would obviously no longer work, since the wheelchair blob hides the interchangeness. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On May 25, 1:26*pm, "Paul Rigg" wrote: If you ignore the wheelchair symbol the Dalston Junction symbol looks the same as the Mile End or Finsbury Park symbols , both of which are cross platform interchanges. I note that Hammersmith has also been changed so that the District and Hammersmith & City stations are joined as one station. *I am sure that at one time they were not. *Does this show some change in policy on the part of LRT . *Is it to indicate that Oyster recognises that travel via those stations is an interchange? I think it's nothing more than changed thinking about how to best represent such interchanges - there seems to be various schools of thought on this, and which one has the upper hand shifts over time. (Perhaps market research suggested that many passengers genuinely didn't realise how close the Hammersmith H&C/Circle station was - combined with the increased frequency as a result of the Circle line T- cup changes, this new look on the map might help to persuade more passengers to use it... I'm speculating of course...) Oyster has recognised the Hammersmiths as a valid Out-of-Station Interchange (OSI) since the beginning, I think - so nothing has changed in that regard lately. (Oh, and LRT are long gone!) The number of circles at the interchanges appear to have no meaning *For example Baker Street, which is all one station, *has two now, wheras West Hamsptead, which is a Jubilee Line station and an entirely separate North London line station (originally West End Lane) only shows one. I think it's just the demands of trying to show the lines clearly - don't try and read too much into it. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oyster back office version delays | London Transport | |||
May Modern Raiways, Map of London's Railways | London Transport | |||
Fwd: Planets Gather on May 5 and May 17, 2000 | London Transport | |||
Passport to Pimlico - 2004 version? | London Transport | |||
East London Line may be shelved until at least 2010 | London Transport |