Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 24, 5:41*am, Mizter T wrote:
On May 24, 12:19*pm, burkey wrote: On May 24, 10:59*am, Mizter T wrote: On May 24, 10:11*am, Fat richard wrote: [snip] The Euston DC service appears to be OK but I suspect very very full indeed. Perhaps wiley WCML commuters might want to aquaint themselves with the walk of just over a mile between Watford Jn to Watford Met stations (it's pretty straightforward). Alternatively there's the 142 bus from Watford Jn, ultimately bound for Brent Cross, which passes Stanmore (Jubilee line) and Edgware (Northern line) stations, though it's a bit of a schlep.- Hide quoted text - The Croxley Link would have relieved a lot of "pain"! Not going to happen now of course, along with anything else that costs money... This I had not heard! Unbelievable! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On May 25, 4:47*pm, E27002 wrote: On May 24, 5:41*am, Mizter T wrote: On May 24, 12:19*pm, burkey wrote: The Croxley Link would have relieved a lot of "pain"! Not going to happen now of course, along with anything else that costs money... This I had not heard! *Unbelievable! I haven't heard anything new re the Croxley Link - but the point is that this project hadn't been given the go-ahead, so it's rather unlikely to be given the green light now in the new age of austerity (even if they did vote a Tory MP in rather than a Labour one like last time). |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 25, 9:59*am, Mizter T wrote:
On May 25, 4:47*pm, E27002 wrote: On May 24, 5:41*am, Mizter T wrote: On May 24, 12:19*pm, burkey wrote: The Croxley Link would have relieved a lot of "pain"! Not going to happen now of course, along with anything else that costs money... This I had not heard! *Unbelievable! I haven't heard anything new re the Croxley Link - but the point is that this project hadn't been given the go-ahead, so it's rather unlikely to be given the green light now in the new age of austerity (even if they did vote a Tory MP in rather than a Labour one like last time). OK, my haste to judgment. Let's hope this small but useful extension survives the cuts. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On May 25, 7:06*pm, E27002 wrote: On May 25, 9:59*am, Mizter T wrote: On May 25, 4:47*pm, E27002 wrote: On May 24, 5:41*am, Mizter T wrote: On May 24, 12:19*pm, burkey wrote: The Croxley Link would have relieved a lot of "pain"! Not going to happen now of course, along with anything else that costs money... This I had not heard! *Unbelievable! I haven't heard anything new re the Croxley Link - but the point is that this project hadn't been given the go-ahead, so it's rather unlikely to be given the green light now in the new age of austerity (even if they did vote a Tory MP in rather than a Labour one like last time). OK, my haste to judgment. *Let's hope this small but useful extension survives the cuts. It can't be cut if it isn't happening - thus the government don't have any need to announce that it's been chopped, because "it" never was, IYSWIM... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WCML classic service after HS2 | London Transport | |||
Monday start for full WCML timetable | London Transport |