Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mizter T wrote:
There'll be various bits of info buried around the TfL site I'd think (e.g. in the Board papers), but I haven't really delved into that side of things much. In the grand scheme of things, I don't think it's a very expensive project overall in terms of the total transport budget. I doubt it'll never be self-sufficient, even taking into account the Barclays sponsorship - but I'll stop spouting vagaries now and leave it open to others to supply rather more concrete specifics! Boris originally said it was to be provided at no cost to London, but later backtracked on this, and at about £40-45m a year for the last two years it's not hard to see this as a pretty expensive project overall. Barclay's £25m over five years (IIRC) is for both Cycle Hire and Cycle Superhighways so has to be seen as about 1/10th of the total £250m odd cost of both schemes, if the 12 CS routes are ever completed. That's pretty hefty, about half a Victoria Station rebuilding or a quarter of an East London Line. Basically, whatever the running costs, TfL's put in a lot up front, mostly IIRC nicked from existing cycle scheme budgets (e.g. LCN+). On the holistics point, I suspect the main abstraction will be from buses, then taxis. In that sense it possibly increases the bus subsidy per passenger, although a lot depends on the kind of user who'll take it. I'm still not sure who it's aimed at, given that they're specifically avoiding trying to provide for commuter flows from terminal stations (they'd need a hell of a lot more bikes and vans to move them about, since catering for commuter flows is highly capital intensive in vehicles). It's more likely they're aiming it at short trip casual users who may have business in a couple of areas of town on the same day, and can take a bike between them instead of a cab or working out which bus goes there or dropping down into the Tube for a short, expensive Zone 1 trip. I'm still in favour of a licensed pedicab scheme, personally. Could even combine the two, and it has the benefit of being usable by post-pub crowds - I'm so looking forward to the first drunk freewheeling through London on a Boris bike (yes, it's banned, no, Boris doesn't think it's a problem, at least for himself). Even better, how about hire-pedicabs? Two up front pedalling, two in the back? That would be *ace*. Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The truth about Boris's London cycle hire scheme - Daily Telegraph | London Transport | |||
Ghost trips appearing on the London Cycle Hire scheme | London Transport | |||
Cycle hire | London Transport | |||
TfL cycle hire | London Transport | |||
SWT go into cycle hire business | London Transport |