On 3 July, 18:35, wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 02:11:23 -0700 (PDT)

MIG wrote:
That story said more about the Taxpayers' Alliance than about Bob
Crow. *They would rather pursue their true political interests to
attack people who aren't paid through taxes.

Actually what it says about Bob Crow is that anyone on 105K and still trying
to fight some patheric class war is nothing more than a cynical aggitator
and a stinking hypocrite.

I am not defending large salaries for union leaders. I spent a lot of
my union activity opposing them in the past.

But for an organisation supposedly campaigning for value for taxpayers
to choose to campaign around salaries that don't come out of taxes is
even more hypocritical.