Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 26, 10:08*am, RPM wrote:
.. Chiltern services can only use the fast lines and unlike the fast Met services they do not stop at Moor Park. Is that a recent change? ISTR that in earlier days, North of Harrow, BR trains, for the most part, stopped at the same stations as Metropolitan Line fasts. Thanks |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 26, 6:21*pm, E27002 wrote:
On Jun 26, 10:08*am, RPM wrote: . Chiltern services can only use the fast lines and unlike the fast Met services they do not stop at Moor Park. Is that a recent change? *ISTR that in earlier days, North of Harrow, BR trains, for the most part, stopped at the same stations as Metropolitan Line fasts. Chiltern ceased calling at Moor Park around the time of privatisation, in the mid 1990s. What I can't remember if it was before Chiltern were privatised or a bit afterwards. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jun 26, 7:20*pm, Andy wrote: On Jun 26, 6:21*pm, E27002 wrote: On Jun 26, 10:08*am, RPM wrote: . Chiltern services can only use the fast lines and unlike the fast Met services they do not stop at Moor Park. Is that a recent change? *ISTR that in earlier days, North of Harrow, BR trains, for the most part, stopped at the same stations as Metropolitan Line fasts. Chiltern ceased calling at Moor Park around the time of privatisation, in the mid 1990s. What I can't remember if it was before Chiltern were privatised or a bit afterwards. What was the logic behind that change? Obviously nowadays it makes sense, as Chiltern are focussed on the longer distance passengers, but back then the Chiltern line had rather less patronage. (Maybe it was something to do with fares revenue allocation?) |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 26, 10:19*pm, Mizter T wrote:
On Jun 26, 7:20*pm, Andy wrote: On Jun 26, 6:21*pm, E27002 wrote: On Jun 26, 10:08*am, RPM wrote: . Chiltern services can only use the fast lines and unlike the fast Met services they do not stop at Moor Park. Is that a recent change? *ISTR that in earlier days, North of Harrow, BR trains, for the most part, stopped at the same stations as Metropolitan Line fasts. Chiltern ceased calling at Moor Park around the time of privatisation, in the mid 1990s. What I can't remember if it was before Chiltern were privatised or a bit afterwards. What was the logic behind that change? Obviously nowadays it makes sense, as Chiltern are focussed on the longer distance passengers, but back then the Chiltern line had rather less patronage. (Maybe it was something to do with fares revenue allocation?) I don't know the reason, but it may have been due to overcrowding of the Chiltern services. I'm not sure how revenue is allocated between LU and Chiltern, but it might also have been a consideration. The lack of Chiltern trains does leave an annoying gap in the service heading north. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 26, 2:19*pm, Mizter T wrote:
On Jun 26, 7:20*pm, Andy wrote: On Jun 26, 6:21*pm, E27002 wrote: On Jun 26, 10:08*am, RPM wrote: . Chiltern services can only use the fast lines and unlike the fast Met services they do not stop at Moor Park. Is that a recent change? *ISTR that in earlier days, North of Harrow, BR trains, for the most part, stopped at the same stations as Metropolitan Line fasts. Chiltern ceased calling at Moor Park around the time of privatisation, in the mid 1990s. What I can't remember if it was before Chiltern were privatised or a bit afterwards. What was the logic behind that change? Obviously nowadays it makes sense, as Chiltern are focussed on the longer distance passengers, but back then the Chiltern line had rather less patronage. (Maybe it was something to do with fares revenue allocation?) It also complicates journeys from stations north of Amersham to Watford. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 10:21:39 -0700 (PDT), E27002
wrote: On Jun 26, 10:08*am, RPM wrote: . Chiltern services can only use the fast lines and unlike the fast Met services they do not stop at Moor Park. Is that a recent change? ISTR that in earlier days, North of Harrow, BR trains, for the most part, stopped at the same stations as Metropolitan Line fasts. Which "earlier days" ? Before the 1960s there was only one pair of tracks from Harrow to Moor Park and BR trains did not stop at intermediate stations. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Charles Ellson" wrote Which "earlier days" ? Before the 1960s there was only one pair of tracks from Harrow to Moor Park and BR trains did not stop at intermediate stations. April 1960 ABC shows that BR trains served all the intermediate stations between Harrow on the Hill and Moor Park. Several called at Pinner and Northwood, but the other stations were served occasionally. There even seems to have been a through train from Chesham to Marylebone. The Watford branch was only opened in, IIRC, 1926, and was electrified from the start. For a few months it was served, about equally, by Metropolitan electric trains from Baker Street and LNER steam trains from Maylebone. Peter |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jun 27, 1:30*am, E27002 wrote: On Jun 26, 2:19*pm, Mizter T wrote: On Jun 26, 7:20*pm, Andy wrote: On Jun 26, 6:21*pm, E27002 wrote: On Jun 26, 10:08*am, RPM wrote: . Chiltern services can only use the fast lines and unlike the fast Met services they do not stop at Moor Park. Is that a recent change? *ISTR that in earlier days, North of Harrow, BR trains, for the most part, stopped at the same stations as Metropolitan Line fasts. Chiltern ceased calling at Moor Park around the time of privatisation, in the mid 1990s. What I can't remember if it was before Chiltern were privatised or a bit afterwards. What was the logic behind that change? Obviously nowadays it makes sense, as Chiltern are focussed on the longer distance passengers, but back then the Chiltern line had rather less patronage. (Maybe it was something to do with fares revenue allocation?) It also complicates journeys from stations north of Amersham to Watford. True. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Charles Ellson" wrote in message ... On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 10:21:39 -0700 (PDT), E27002 wrote: On Jun 26, 10:08 am, RPM wrote: . Chiltern services can only use the fast lines and unlike the fast Met services they do not stop at Moor Park. Is that a recent change? ISTR that in earlier days, North of Harrow, BR trains, for the most part, stopped at the same stations as Metropolitan Line fasts. Which "earlier days" ? Before the 1960s there was only one pair of tracks from Harrow to Moor Park and BR trains did not stop at intermediate stations. Oh yes they did, as other posted has suggested, e.g. http://www.ephotozine.com/photo/1411606 David |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 June, 11:58, "David Thornhill" wrote:
"Charles Ellson" wrote in message ... On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 10:21:39 -0700 (PDT), E27002 wrote: On Jun 26, 10:08 am, RPM wrote: . Chiltern services can only use the fast lines and unlike the fast Met services they do not stop at Moor Park. Is that a recent change? *ISTR that in earlier days, North of Harrow, BR trains, for the most part, stopped at the same stations as Metropolitan Line fasts. Which "earlier days" ? Before the 1960s there was only one pair of tracks from Harrow to Moor Park and BR trains did not stop at intermediate stations. Oh yes they did, as other posted has suggested, e.g. http://www.ephotozine.com/photo/1411606 David And the stopping services caused delays to late running GC Expresses in the 50s and earlier. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Kings Cross Main line to Victoria Line? | London Transport | |||
Metropolitan Main Line Question | London Transport | |||
Metropolitan Main Line Question | London Transport | |||
West Anglia Main Line Progress Report - DfT | London Transport | |||
West Anglia Main Line Progress Report - DfT | London Transport |