Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8 July, 13:58, Neil Williams wrote:
I'm saying the whole overbridge should be within a common barriered area containing both LUL and the mainline. * Not possible - that bridge is a pedestrian right of way from the canal path to Eastbourne Terrace, and can't be completely gated - which is why the gates on the bridge to the platforms are as they are. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jul 9, 11:02*am, Chris wrote: On 8 July, 13:58, Neil *Williams wrote: I'm saying the whole overbridge should be within a common barriered area containing both LUL and the mainline. * Not possible - that bridge is a pedestrian right of way from the canal path to Eastbourne Terrace, and can't be completely gated - which is why the gates on the bridge to the platforms are as they are. Is it actually a right of way? I wouldn't be so sure that it is. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 03:07:29 -0700 (PDT), Mizter T
wrote: On Jul 9, 11:02*am, Chris wrote: On 8 July, 13:58, Neil *Williams wrote: I'm saying the whole overbridge should be within a common barriered area containing both LUL and the mainline. * Not possible - that bridge is a pedestrian right of way from the canal path to Eastbourne Terrace, and can't be completely gated - which is why the gates on the bridge to the platforms are as they are. Is it actually a right of way? I wouldn't be so sure that it is. If it isn't then an appropriate sign ought to be in position. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jul 9, 7:01*pm, Charles Ellson wrote: On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 03:07:29 -0700 (PDT), Mizter T wrote: On Jul 9, 11:02*am, Chris wrote: On 8 July, 13:58, Neil *Williams wrote: I'm saying the whole overbridge should be within a common barriered area containing both LUL and the mainline. * Not possible - that bridge is a pedestrian right of way from the canal path to Eastbourne Terrace, and can't be completely gated - which is why the gates on the bridge to the platforms are as they are. Is it actually a right of way? I wouldn't be so sure that it is. If it isn't then an appropriate sign ought to be in position. Which I *think* there might be somewhere along there (the 'not dedicated as a public R-O-W one). |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Charles Ellson" wrote Is it actually a right of way? I wouldn't be so sure that it is. If it isn't then an appropriate sign ought to be in position. There are other ways of ensuring that a way does not become a public right of way by presumed dedication. One is to close it for one day a year, and retain evidence of having done so. It is also possible to deposit a map and statutory declarations with the highway authority. But I agree that the normal way is to post a sign. Peter |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Massive Disruption at Paddington - Very Badly Handled Yet Again | London Transport | |||
Paddington Barriers | London Transport | |||
new ticket barriers at paddington | London Transport | |||
Oxford Street trams - again - again | London Transport | |||
Paddington Bear at Paddington Station | London Transport |