Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jul 21, 12:16*pm, "Paul Scott" wrote: "Mizter T" wrote: On Jul 21, 12:41 am, Roy Badami wrote: On 20/07/10 14:58, Paul Scott wrote: If coming the other way, you'll be in the paid area without touching in, so will register an unstarted journey when (if) you eventually touch out. This bit I'm confused by. *I didn't think you ever should touch out on a tram - I thought they're treated like buses? *Interchanging from tram to tube at Wimbledon doesn't change that rule, does it? I think all Paul is referring to is touching out on the pad on the automatic gate - you need to do this to get out of the station (and this is why Wimbledon is a 'special case' for Tramlink, i.e. the tram stop is within a gated paid-for area.) I was trying to get across the general case that if you got off the tram and did nothing at Wimbledon, when you touched out at 'some other station' you'd have been travelling without a tube/rail touch in, and the gates would charge a max cash fare on the grounds the journey was unstarted. You'd also be subject to a PF if checked en route. Yes, that's all correct. This would also be true for a touch out on the barrier line at Wimbledon if you hadn't used the special validator when getting off the tram, as I understand it from previous discussions... No, that's not correct. So long as one has correctly touched-in at a tram stop before travelling to Wimbledon, then if the journey is finishing at Wimbledon (and the passenger is thus exiting the station) there's no requirement to touch on anything again on the tram platform after alighting from the tram. The Oyster readers on the gates at Wimbledon will correctly identify that you're an exiting tram passenger who's paid their fare and will let you through (and if the gates are locked open then you wouldn't even need to touch-out on the gate's Oyster reader, though of course you can still do so). However if you're *entering* Wimbledon station then after passing through the gates you *are* requirement to touch on the Oyster reader on the tram platform - failure to do so will result in the system assuming one was to make a Tube/NR journey, and hence charging the max fare because one didn't touch-out at a Tube/NR station having completed a Tube/NR journey. (Incidentally, if a tram passenger did alight at Wimbledon then touch on one of the Oyster readers on the tram platform, then it's quite possible there'd be no ill-effect - Tramlink allows one 'free transfer' using Oyster from tram to tram, as any Tramlink destination can be reached by using just two trams - this is implemented by allowing a second 'free' touch-in at a tram stop within IIRC 70 minutes of the first touch-in. Therefore by my reading of things if a passenger arriving at Wimbledon mistakenly touches on one of the tram platform validators they wouldn't be charged for another tram journey unless they've already used up their 'free transfer' - the same applies for anyone getting off a tram anywhere else on the system and erroneously thinking they need to touch-out.) |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jul 21, 3:54*pm, wrote: On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 07:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Mizter T wrote: That's simply nonsense and completely wrong - if you don't have a validated Oyster card then you are travelling without a ticket and are liable to a PF or prosecution. This is what all the posters and signs say, for example these ones on the interior of doors on Tube trains: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mixthem...te/4019285039/ I'd love to see them try that on in court. A valid ticket is a valid ticket whether its been touched in or not whatever their conditions say. Those conditions are not a legal document. Unless *they can PROVE that they would have lost money by the ticket not being touched in I don't see a court in the country upholding a prosecution. You really think that? All the TfL blurb - including all the small print (i.e. the conditions of carriage - which *is* a legal document) - makes clear that an Oyster card is only a valid ticket if it's been validated (at least when being used for PAYG) - an un-validated Oyster card is therefore not a valid ticket. I'm pretty sure there'll have been successful prosecutions to this effect already. But feel free to attempt to put yourself in this position so you can try your flawed argument out...! |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , d
writes I'd love to see them try that on in court. They already have: http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa...-cost-10000.do The case goes to appeal next month. -- Paul Terry |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mizter T" wrote in message ... On Jul 21, 12:16 pm, "Paul Scott" wrote: This would also be true for a touch out on the barrier line at Wimbledon if you hadn't used the special validator when getting off the tram, as I understand it from previous discussions... No, that's not correct. So long as one has correctly touched-in at a tram stop before travelling to Wimbledon, then if the journey is finishing at Wimbledon (and the passenger is thus exiting the station) there's no requirement to touch on anything again on the tram platform after alighting from the tram. The Oyster readers on the gates at Wimbledon will correctly identify that you're an exiting tram passenger who's paid their fare and will let you through (and if the gates are locked open then you wouldn't even need to touch-out on the gate's Oyster reader, though of course you can still do so). Thanks for the correction - I'm sure that's been the previous explanation, but we live and learn... Paul S |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 21 July, 15:29, David Walters wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:48:11 +0000 (UTC), wrote: You can't get a penalty fare if you have a valid oyster card that has enough money to pay a max fare on it. Unless an oyster is now only valid if its touched in If you don't have a seasion ticket that is the case. From the Conditions of Carriage: "If you do not touch in at the start and touch out at the end of your journey, you may be charged more than the advertised Oyster single fare and this journey will not be included in any daily price capping. You may also be liable to a Penalty fare or you may be prosecuted. *" David Where does a "journey" start? Less of an issue now with PAYG on NR, but in the past it came up with people travelling on Oyster seasons from, say, Slade green and changing to the DLR at Greenwich, with an zone 1 - 6 season on Oyster, and all that silliness about having to touch in on the DLR even with a season, "at the start of your journey". |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jul 21, 4:49*pm, "Paul Scott" wrote: "Mizter T" wrote: On Jul 21, 12:16 pm, "Paul Scott" wrote: This would also be true for a touch out on the barrier line at Wimbledon if you hadn't used the special validator when getting off the tram, as I understand it from previous discussions... No, that's not correct. So long as one has correctly touched-in at a tram stop before travelling to Wimbledon, then if the journey is finishing at Wimbledon (and the passenger is thus exiting the station) there's no requirement to touch on anything again on the tram platform after alighting from the tram. The Oyster readers on the gates at Wimbledon will correctly identify that you're an exiting tram passenger who's paid their fare and will let you through (and if the gates are locked open then you wouldn't even need to touch-out on the gate's Oyster reader, though of course you can still do so). Thanks for the correction - I'm sure that's been the previous explanation, but we live and learn... No probs, and if that was my previous explanation, then apologies for it being unclear or misleading! I'm pretty much 100% certain this is how it's been since the coming of Oyster. Incidentally I recall being rather unimpressed at the information provided at Wimbledon when Oyster first arrived, though eventually posters were displayed which were sort-of helpful. I'm not sure of what the situation is like there now (post PAYG on NR), haven't been there for a while, but I did stop by at Elmers End a couple of months or so ago (was actually driving past) to have a look at what information and advice was displayed for Oyster users - and I was disappointed to find that there was nothing at all. (Elmers End isn't gated, by the way.) |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, Mizter T writes Incidentally I recall being rather unimpressed at the information provided at Wimbledon when Oyster first arrived, though eventually posters were displayed which were sort-of helpful. I'm not sure of what the situation is like there now Last time I was there, the need to touch out at the ticket gates was clearly signed, but a further degree of confusion was added by a notice not to use the yellow reader adjacent to the manual gate when leaving the station! -- Paul Terry |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jul 21, 5:48 pm, Paul Terry wrote: In message , Mizter T writes Incidentally I recall being rather unimpressed at the information provided at Wimbledon when Oyster first arrived, though eventually posters were displayed which were sort-of helpful. I'm not sure of what the situation is like there now Last time I was there, the need to touch out at the ticket gates was clearly signed, but a further degree of confusion was added by a notice not to use the yellow reader adjacent to the manual gate when leaving the station! OK, well I can say things have changed since you were there - sometime last year I think the manual side gates were replaced with the "WAGs", that is the wide-aisle gates (as opposed to ticket checks being done by Coleen Rooney, Abigail Clancy et al [1]). I assume that the standalone reader next to the manual gate caused some sort of issue here because it was directionally ambiguous - i.e. it couldn't tell whether a passenger was entering or leaving the system. Touching an Oyster on a gate meanwhile isn't ambiguous at all - it's a definitive indicator of either an entry or an exit. So that's one issue less to contend with at least! ----- [1] I did need to google for this, BTW! |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I should never have mentioned the Wimbledon tram issue! The point was
really about the pink validators... |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:11:45 -0700 (PDT), Mizter T
wrote: [...] So long as one has correctly touched-in at a tram stop before travelling to Wimbledon, then if the journey is finishing at Wimbledon (and the passenger is thus exiting the station) there's no requirement to touch on anything again on the tram platform after alighting from the tram. [...] I wouldn't touch again on the platform, as I said I paid again once that way: fair enough, you could argue that the free transfer wouldn't apply at terminals. Thanks for the explanations, everyone, and sorry to go on about it. Wimbledon is clearly an extra large can of worms. The signage there is *completely* insufficient if all we read above is true (no reason to think not) and there should be announcements on the tram as well - there are about every other bloody thing. I am a great supporter of Oyster (except Network Railcard) but at this one station, and maybe a few others, could things not be improved? My earlier post now seems off-topic as we were supposed to be talking about route validators. I didn't know there was one there, clearly my mistake. But then, the current "Getting Around with Oyster" (May 2010) doesn't refer to what to do at Wimbedon when leaving the network somewhere else: "I get the tram to/from Wimbledon station. What should I do? If you travel by tram to Wimbledon, always touch in at the start of your journey and touch out at the station gates when leaving the station. Do not use the yellow card reader on the manual gate when you exit. When travelling by tram from Wimbledon, always touch in at the station gates and again at the yellow card reader on the tram platform before boarding." The route validators in the Wimbledon tram case are not always fulfiling their usual purpose of indicating a [cheaper] route taken. They are, as I think Mizter T pointed out weeks ago, also able to record an "in" and thus avoid a penalty. I can now see that I have over-paid on a recent journey via Wimbledon where I didn't validate there. [Previous balance £20.10] 22:21 Carshalton [National Rail] Entry - £4.30 £15.80 22:32 Mitcham Junction Tramstop Entry £0.00 £15.80 ^^ Why not a tram fare? Earlier cap? 23:06 Surbiton [National Rail] Exit - £4.30 £11.50 Total: £8.60. Total for the day £13.70 instead of a £5.10 Zone 2-6 cap. Interesting that on the unlisted outward journey, the Wimbledon tram validator recorded an exit rather than a bus-like entry. Anyway, setting this all out like this has helped me understand exactly what happened, so I might as well click "send" and share the pain. Thanks, Richard. http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloa...r_may_2010.pdf |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Compulsory vs Request stops | London Transport | |||
Goodbye OEP hello compulsory Touch In | London Transport | |||
Compulsory Stops | London Transport | |||
Those "Pre Pay users" Oyster validators | London Transport | |||
No Oyster validators at Hounslow East Eastbound | London Transport |