Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6 Aug, 16:15, Basil Jet wrote:
I believe that plan died a few years ago. I've certainly seen it alive more recently than that; I think it's died and been revived several times over the years. I suspect that it's probably dead now, at least until the present economic climate improves. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
On 6 Aug, 16:15, Basil Jet wrote: I believe that plan died a few years ago. I've certainly seen it alive more recently than that; I think it's died and been revived several times over the years. I suspect that it's probably dead now, at least until the present economic climate improves. Probably longer than that -- Chiltern is now more focused on serving longer distance routes (Brum, and soon Oxford, and maybe even Miltpn Keynes), not suburban London. It provides a minimal service to its other London stations, and wouldn't want to have stopping local trains holding up its increasing number of fast, longer distance trains. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 7, 12:36*pm, "Recliner" wrote:
wrote in message On 6 Aug, 16:15, Basil Jet wrote: I believe that plan died a few years ago. I've certainly seen it alive more recently than that; I think it's died and been revived several times over the years. *I suspect that it's probably dead now, at least until the present economic climate improves. Probably longer than that -- Chiltern is now more focused on serving longer distance routes (Brum, and soon Oxford, and maybe even Miltpn Keynes), not suburban London. It provides a minimal service to its other London stations, and wouldn't want to have stopping local trains holding up its increasing number of fast, longer distance trains. If that is indeed the case, I wonder if shallow travelators west to Edgware Road and east to Baker St. from Marylebone might be preferred options instead? Yeah there's the Bakerloo, but it's pointless if all you want to do is change to the SSL lines one station away, as it takes so long going down to the platforms and back up again. I still think moving the Met interchange to West Hampstead is worthwhile though, if only for the NLL and Thameslink interchanges it adds. Passive provision (i.e. spaces) for Chiltern platforms would probably be more than sufficient for the time being. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 6, 8:15*am, Basil Jet wrote:
On 2010\08\06 15:58, wrote: On 6 Aug, 12:28, *wrote: Does anyone know if there any plans to build any new stations and/or extra platforms to link up some of the existing bits of rail infrastructure in the London area? 11. West Hampstead: Chiltern, Jubilee, Metropolitan, MML, NLL Things have been proposed at West Hampstead for many years; what became Thameslink was originally proposed by the GLC as an extension of Southern Region services to terminate there for interchange with the other lines. *Quite recently there have been proposals for platforms on the Chiltern lines, and improved interchange between the three stations there. I believe that plan died a few years ago. That, if true, would be a pity. Chiltern is serving destinations further from London, and is likely to add more. Marylebone is not the ideal terminus being served by only one subway line. A call at West Hampstead would give Chiltern's long distance passengers a range of options for onward travel to diverse parts of London. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Gatwick Fastway (Fantasy?) | London Transport | |||
Fantasy bus routes | London Transport | |||
Visiting London & Newcastle: any suggested stations | London Transport | |||
Problems with Travelcard issued at NR stations | London Transport | |||
New Abbreviation for two LU stations. | London Transport |