Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/08/2010 23:14, David Hansen wrote:
On Sun, 08 Aug 2010 22:24:07 +0100 someone who may be Scott wrote this:- I'm not sure 'rip-off' is the correct term as a rip-off implies intent to over-charge and I am sure TfL has no such intent. Are you? Why? It is very convenient for rip-off merchants to claim that they didn't intend to rip people off, it was something beyond their control. The Tony B Liar approach. Don't forget the police, and a cryptic reference to England. This sounds like a technical problem Yea, yeah, yeah. The machines did it all on their own, nothing at all to do with the way they were programmed by Boris and his henchmen. Boris crept in when Ken wasn't looking and sabotaged the machines? And surely Thatcher must be to blame somehow? -- Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oyster: still an unreliable rip-off | London Transport | |||
Anger at Oyster cards 'rip-off' as millions hit for not 'touching out' | London Transport | |||
Oyster - a 60 million a year rip-off | London Transport | |||
Southall - Zonal fare rip-off? | London Transport | |||
Microsoft's rip-off of Google Earth | London Transport |