Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 06:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
Andy wrote: Yes, but the '73 stock is narrower than both the '67 and '09 stock, the overhand at the corners depends on both the length, the width and the positions of the bogies on the cars. Whatever the reason, to me it seems daft to have built a train to large to be able to run on any other tube line and can't even be rail hauled to its depot. And then instead of using the tiny amount of extra space the larger size has gained they waste it with thick walls and door pillars. Common sense was in short supply when the 2009 trains were designed IMO. B2003 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why isn't the 2009 stock walk through like the S stock? | London Transport | |||
TfL / NLL / Metronet surface stock / tube stock / Croxley link | London Transport | |||
LU Stock Transfer Routes | London Transport | |||
1938 Stock on Uxbridge 100 and T Stock? | London Transport | |||
Tunnel routes Question | London Transport |