"®i©ardo" wrote in message
...
On 10/10/2010 19:54, Brimstone wrote:

"Bruce" wrote in message
...
®i©ardo wrote:

We'll be getting the "well, you know what I mean" response when it is
pointed out that, by virtue of their illiteracy, someone has written
utter scribble. When I used to lecture on English contract law I was
forever telling the gormless scrotes - all of whom had "achieved" A*
GCSE English, of course - that what they'd written meant something
completely different to what they thought it meant. This, in
contractual
terms could have meant an utter disaster. Yet, throughout their
schooling years punctuation and grammar had been totally ignored,
perhaps because the students had been taught by illiterates.

Still, given that now, it seems, the educational norm is to be
illiterate - and innumerate, which is part of the same problem - I
suppose we'll have to accept the NUT has achieved a measure of social
equality in dumbing everybody down.


My thoughts, exactly.

I don't know which is worse - people who do not care how wrong they
are, or people who do not know. In either case, the teaching
"profession"* has an awful lot to answer for.


[* Never was the word 'profession' so inappropriately applied.]

What is worse are the people with nothing better to do that scribble
interminably over a couple of mistakes. Quite obviously you and the PP
believe that people who make honest mistakes, in a totally unimportant
passage, should be shot. **** knows how you would react if it was a
similar error in a multi-billion pound contract.

Well, it would probably negate the contract, which demonstrates exactly
why such things are of the utmost importance! Unless, of course, you can
afford to throw billions of pounds by virtue of your ignorance or
stupidity.

But a newsgroup posting and a multi-billion pound contract are not even
close to being of the same importance are they?

Still, being a good Socialist (if there can be such a thing), it wouldn't
worry you, would it, as it would be someone else's money anyway.

If I were a socialist, good or bad, you might have a point. As I'm not, you
don't.