Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/11/2010 12:40, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 10:50:14 on Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Ret. remarked: For Boltar to pontificate based upon his assessment of an accident scene having just driven past it long after it occurred is stupid. But I still have this uneasy question... if it was that long after the accident, why were almost all the lanes still closed? Note, this is a quite different question to "why did they need to close lanes immediately after the accident". Was there any hazardous/dangerous cargo inside the lorry! How would one know? Bod |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
traffic is better, but livingstone is thinking of more traffic zone? | London Transport | |||
A40 traffic lights rephased? | London Transport | |||
researching mega traffic jams | London Transport | |||
Camera like sensors on top of traffic lights | London Transport | |||
Traffic lights | London Transport |