Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 19:25:39 +0000 (UTC), "Cast_Iron"
wrote: With one exception all transport systems in the UK are privately owned and/or managed. Has anyone added Translink (bus and rail) to the list yet? Also various funiculars. -- Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Arthur Figgis wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 19:25:39 +0000 (UTC), "Cast_Iron" wrote: With one exception all transport systems in the UK are privately owned and/or managed. Has anyone added Translink (bus and rail) to the list yet? As far as I'm aware Translink is a service provider rather than an infrastructure owner and not therefore relevant to the subject of this thread. Also various funiculars. Funiculars are by their nature very local and generally privately owned although some may be owned and/or operated by the local council. In terms of essential transport provision I feel they fall outside the scope of this thread. |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 00:58:24 +0000 (UTC), "Cast_Iron"
wrote: Arthur Figgis wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 19:25:39 +0000 (UTC), "Cast_Iron" wrote: With one exception all transport systems in the UK are privately owned and/or managed. Has anyone added Translink (bus and rail) to the list yet? As far as I'm aware Translink is a service provider rather than an infrastructure owner and not therefore relevant to the subject of this thread. Looking at it like that, I think it is a common marketing/branding name for one rail and two bus organisations, with a structure behiond them which is somewhat more complicated but unimportant to the end user, BICBW. I don't know about the buses, but the rail side is vertically-integrated and publicly owned, and surely 360 km (ish) of passenger railway must count as part of the UK's transport system? Also various funiculars. Funiculars are by their nature very local and generally privately owned although some may be owned and/or operated by the local council. In terms of essential transport provision I feel they fall outside the scope of this thread. I must admit I thought most were owned by local authorities, but I've never looked it up. Who owns the canals these days? -- Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Arthur Figgis" ] wrote in message ... On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 00:58:24 +0000 (UTC), "Cast_Iron" wrote: Arthur Figgis wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 19:25:39 +0000 (UTC), "Cast_Iron" wrote: With one exception all transport systems in the UK are privately owned and/or managed. Has anyone added Translink (bus and rail) to the list yet? As far as I'm aware Translink is a service provider rather than an infrastructure owner and not therefore relevant to the subject of this thread. Looking at it like that, I think it is a common marketing/branding name for one rail and two bus organisations, with a structure behiond them which is somewhat more complicated but unimportant to the end user, BICBW. I don't know about the buses, but the rail side is vertically-integrated and publicly owned, and surely 360 km (ish) of passenger railway must count as part of the UK's transport system? Also various funiculars. Funiculars are by their nature very local and generally privately owned although some may be owned and/or operated by the local council. In terms of essential transport provision I feel they fall outside the scope of this thread. I must admit I thought most were owned by local authorities, but I've never looked it up. Who owns the canals these days? They are not a general used method of transport in the UK, unfortunately, being used mainly for leisure and recreation. From BW's website, "British Waterways is a public corporation sponsored by the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) in England and Wales and the Scottish Executive in Scotland." |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Who owns the canals these days? They are not a general used method of transport in the UK, unfortunately, being used mainly for leisure and recreation. I expect they make far more money for the country as recreational though and they're certainly far nicer to live next to. |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Cast_Iron wrote:
"Arthur Figgis" ] wrote in message ... On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 00:58:24 +0000 (UTC), "Cast_Iron" wrote: Arthur Figgis wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 19:25:39 +0000 (UTC), "Cast_Iron" wrote: With one exception all transport systems in the UK are privately owned and/or managed. Who owns the canals these days? They are not a general used method of transport in the UK, unfortunately, being used mainly for leisure and recreation. The towpaths are excellent bike routes, though; in the parts of London that have them, Canals are key components of the cycle network. tom -- Restate my assumptions |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Pedicabs: a public nuisance on the public highway | London Transport | |||
Private Routemaster Shopping Bus on Oxford Street? | London Transport | |||
Private Roads | London Transport | |||
Private contractor problems | London Transport | |||
Private roads | London Transport |