Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 19, 11:02*am, MaxB wrote:
says Valerie Shawcross http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-11792421 I think! MaxB Does anybody really think wheelchair users are ever going to be able to use the tube? Val Shawcross and the like just can't grasp the fact that many disabled people don't want to use public transport, it just isn't a viable option for them and it never will be. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
George gurgled happily, sounding much
like they were saying: Does anybody really think wheelchair users are ever going to be able to use the tube? Val Shawcross and the like just can't grasp the fact that many disabled people don't want to use public transport, it just isn't a viable option for them and it never will be. Well, quite. Why would spazzes, flids & other crips want to try and lead normal lives, anyway? Why can't they just be happy sitting at home drooling in front of daytime TV...? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 19, 11:11*am, Adrian wrote:
George gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: Does anybody really think wheelchair users are ever going to be able to use the tube? Val Shawcross and the like just can't grasp the fact that many disabled people don't want to use public transport, it just isn't a viable option for them and it never will be. Well, quite. Why would spazzes, flids & other crips want to try and lead normal lives, anyway? Why can't they just be happy sitting at home drooling in front of daytime TV...? What like you obviously do? Wouldn't a taxi that took them from door to door be of far more use? Shame it doesn't fit in with some people's politically correct ideals eh? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 Nov 2010 11:11:59 GMT
Adrian wrote: George gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: Does anybody really think wheelchair users are ever going to be able to use the tube? Val Shawcross and the like just can't grasp the fact that many disabled people don't want to use public transport, it just isn't a viable option for them and it never will be. Well, quite. Why would spazzes, flids & other crips want to try and lead normal lives, anyway? Why can't they just be happy sitting at home drooling in front of daytime TV...? Obviously you've never heard of Dial-a-ride then. B2003 |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 03:22:00 -0800 (PST)
George wrote: Wouldn't a taxi that took them from door to door be of far more use? Shame it doesn't fit in with some people's politically correct ideals eh? Don't forget that in politically correct world their is no such thing as a limit on the amount that should be spent accommodating minorities to make metropolitan liberals feel smug and self justified. Even if wheelchair users have door to door service thats not good enough. Far better to spend a few hundred million quid on upgrading the entire tube system so a few hundred extra people in wheelchairs can suffer the misery of it too. B2003 |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 03:22:00 -0800 (PST) George wrote: Wouldn't a taxi that took them from door to door be of far more use? Shame it doesn't fit in with some people's politically correct ideals eh? Don't forget that in politically correct world their is no such thing as a limit on the amount that should be spent accommodating minorities to make metropolitan liberals feel smug and self justified. Even if wheelchair users have door to door service thats not good enough. Far better to spend a few hundred million quid on upgrading the entire tube system so a few hundred extra people in wheelchairs can suffer the misery of it too. The problem is: if you spend 10 million pounds a year on special taxi fares for disabled people, when a period of austerity comes along that money is easy to cut. But if you've spent 200 million on infrastructure changes that are costing you 10 million a year in finance costs you've no choice but to continue paying it tim |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:40:49 -0000
"tim...." wrote: The problem is: if you spend 10 million pounds a year on special taxi fares for disabled people, when a period of austerity comes along that money is easy to cut. But if you've spent 200 million on infrastructure changes that are costing you 10 million a year in finance costs you've no choice but to continue paying it Well money aside there are also more practical considerations. Deep level tube trains are not large and in the rush hour even suitcases cause problems. Wheelchair users would have no chance even in the new trains with the pointless wheelchair section (if theres nowhere for people to move out of the way to to let a wheelchair go there they won't move, end of) since commuters are not going to get off to allow someone in a wheelchair to take their place. They'd either have to get on somewhere near the end of the line, not use it during busy periods or forget it and get a taxi. B2003 |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think they could have done much more with the money spent if they
targeted the spening in a more sensible way. For example they are currently making Green Park accesible at a huge cost. They could have got a lot more stations done if they spent it on the Subsurface stations on the circle line. A scheme to link the main line termini is surely long overdue. And why dont they do such stations as Covent Garden which already has lifts so only need a small lift for stairs down to the platforms. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Get the cash you need quickly and easily | London Transport | |||
Get the cash you need quickly and easily | London Transport | |||
Get the cash you need quickly and easily | London Transport | |||
Can I use Oyster pre pay before 9:30? | London Transport | |||
Why People Won't Use Public Transport in London | London Transport |