Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've just looked at the live departure board for Norwood Junction and
found a rather strange entry. It shows a 1602 departure to Beckenham Junction (currently running 22 mins late) via East Croydon. The full journey is shown as departing London Bridge at 1533, then all stations to Norwood Jct via Tulse Hill and Crystal Palace, then on to East Croydon arriving at 1606, Birkbeck arrival 1603 (but reported as cancelled), and scheduled to arrive at Beckenham Jct. at 1606 but estimated at 1628. Weird. I wonder how that happened? -- John Ray |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Ray" wrote in message news ![]() I've just looked at the live departure board for Norwood Junction and found a rather strange entry. It shows a 1602 departure to Beckenham Junction (currently running 22 mins late) via East Croydon. The full journey is shown as departing London Bridge at 1533, then all stations to Norwood Jct via Tulse Hill and Crystal Palace, then on to East Croydon arriving at 1606, Birkbeck arrival 1603 (but reported as cancelled), and scheduled to arrive at Beckenham Jct. at 1606 but estimated at 1628. Weird. I wonder how that happened? The 1533 is supposed to go to Beckenham Junction so presumably it was diverted to East Croydon but whoever entered it in the system didn't cancel the Beckenham bit properly. Peter Smyth |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 01/12/2010 18:03, Peter Smyth wrote:
The 1533 is supposed to go to Beckenham Junction so presumably it was diverted to East Croydon but whoever entered it in the system didn't cancel the Beckenham bit properly. Thanks - that explains it. -- John Ray |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Smyth" wrote in message ... The 1533 is supposed to go to Beckenham Junction so presumably it was diverted to East Croydon but whoever entered it in the system didn't cancel the Beckenham bit properly. TRUST shows it arv ECR at 16:41 but not leaving. CIS shows it Cancelled at BIK RTTI shown as 'Dealyed' at BKJ I should have been cancelled either in CIS, Live Departure Boards, or Tyrell and then it would have shown up correctly everywhere else. Simple stuff really - and TOC's wonder why pax get hacked off with them. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wonder how that happened?
There were some interesting entries for East Croydon to London Bridge services this morning. First Capital Connect's emergency service from Brighton to City Thameslink was being listed fine, but Southern's service not quite so well. The Three Bridges to London Bridge service was being listed three times. Once as a cancelled service (presumably the normal timetabled service) and twice for what was presumably meant to be the special service. The East Croydon to London Bridge slow service was likewise being listed three times, one the Tattenham Corner cancelled service, and the other two with the Tattenham Corner to East Croydon stops cancelled but then running fast to London Bridge. Having corrected it to a slow stopping service the destinations became variously New Cross Gate, Sydenham and the truly inspired Bricklayers Arms Junction (might have just said Bricklayers Junction, either way it wasn't terribly helpful). They've settled on New Cross Gate now (the London Bridge stop showing as timed at 0.00 and cancelled) so still not right. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Live travel news vs. Live departure boards | London Transport | |||
Tube departure boards | London Transport | |||
LU Live Station Departure Boards | London Transport | |||
Chiltern & the online live departure boards | London Transport | |||
Interesting Oyster... [Error] | London Transport |