Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Malcolm Weir wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 02:13:27 +1030, (Aidan Stanger) wrote: [ Snip ] I admit I don't know the figures, but when the standard missed approach procedure is to go round on the side where aircraft aren't taking off, do you really think that the number of potentially dangerous movements for mixed approaches WOULDN'T increase by several orders of magnitude if aircraft were taking off on both sides? First, on what insanity are you projecting on ATC? Why would aircraft *be* taking off on both sides? If alternation continues on the existing runways, with mixed-mode on the new one, this scenario will happen 50% of the time. To illustrate the foolishness of your fear tactics, let's call the runways Left, Right, and New. All proposals thus far have New be much shorter than Left or Right, and is located to the north. So if you are using New for departures to the west, you'd *also* use Right for departures, and Left for arrivals. Why? And likewise, during easterly operations are you saying that 09L would always be used for departures, a total reversal of the Cranford Agreement? I would simply note that your scenario has little or nothing to do with reality. Yours too, I hope. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
City Airport expansion gets go-ahead - incl. new DLR rolling stock | London Transport | |||
Airport expansion: Heathrow runway 3 and Gatwick runway 2 constituteshortlist | London Transport | |||
OT - Massive fire at Olympic games site | London Transport | |||
Massive Oxford Street Traffic Jam Saturday 28 Feb ? | London Transport | |||
Congestion charging expansion plans: zone expansion. | London Transport |