Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
[x-posted to uk.transport.london]
On Jan 10, 5:32*pm, Ian Jackson wrote: Transport for London occasionally write up a formal report of an incident. *I asked for a list of these: *http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/list_of_firs I followed up with a request for copies of all the reports. *(Why aren't they published as a matter of routine, like RAIB reports?) Because they're internal reports? Remember that RAIB covers LU as well. I dare say Network Rail and indeed the TOCs might have something similar, but said entities are outside the purview of the FOIA because they're totally independent commercial entities which have at most a tangential relationship to government and are in no way public bodies, or something like that. I have now got a response which does contain several reports: *http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/reques...completed_firs Happy reading! Two points: * Does anyone know what the blacked-out section of the signalling * diagram on p17 of the Earls Court report might be ? * Tfl are being hopelessly slow about replying to my FOI requests. * I have complained to the ICO. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mizter T wrote on 10 January 2011 22:05:44 ...
[x-posted to uk.transport.london] On Jan 10, 5:32 pm, Ian wrote: Transport for London occasionally write up a formal report of an incident. I asked for a list of these: http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/list_of_firs I followed up with a request for copies of all the reports. (Why aren't they published as a matter of routine, like RAIB reports?) Because they're internal reports? Remember that RAIB covers LU as well. I dare say Network Rail and indeed the TOCs might have something similar, but said entities are outside the purview of the FOIA because they're totally independent commercial entities which have at most a tangential relationship to government and are in no way public bodies, or something like that. I have now got a response which does contain several reports: http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/reques...completed_firs Happy reading! Two points: * Does anyone know what the blacked-out section of the signalling diagram on p17 of the Earls Court report might be ? [I can't see the original uk.railway thread on my news server for some reason, so apologies if this point has been answered already.] I think it's blacked out because it's out-of-date info on an old diagram that is otherwise still correct. There's a similar diagram at http://www.trainweb.org/districtdave/TS.jpg which shows an IMR (Interlocking Machine Room) at that location, marked as "IMR 'ED' (Triangle Sidings)". My recollection is that IMR 'ED' is now the one just outside High St Kensington station, and it seems that the two IMRs were merged some years ago. So probably it was blacked out for that reason on the original report. -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mizter T wrote on 10 January 2011 22:05:44 ...
[x-posted to uk.transport.london] On Jan 10, 5:32 pm, Ian wrote: Transport for London occasionally write up a formal report of an incident. I asked for a list of these: http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/list_of_firs I followed up with a request for copies of all the reports. (Why aren't they published as a matter of routine, like RAIB reports?) Because they're internal reports? Remember that RAIB covers LU as well. I dare say Network Rail and indeed the TOCs might have something similar, but said entities are outside the purview of the FOIA because they're totally independent commercial entities which have at most a tangential relationship to government and are in no way public bodies, or something like that. I have now got a response which does contain several reports: http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/reques...completed_firs Happy reading! Two points: * Does anyone know what the blacked-out section of the signalling diagram on p17 of the Earls Court report might be ? [I can't see the original uk.railway thread on my news server for some reason, so apologies if this point has been answered already.] I think it's blacked out because it's out-of-date info on an old diagram that is otherwise still correct. There's a similar diagram at http://www.trainweb.org/districtdave/TS.jpg which shows an IMR (Interlocking Machine Room) at that location, marked as "IMR 'ED' (Triangle Sidings)". My recollection is that IMR 'ED' is now the one just outside High St Kensington station, and it seems that the two IMRs were merged some years ago. So probably it was blacked out for that reason on the original report. -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Investigation under way after Tube train collision | London Transport | |||
RAIB Investigation into an incident at Warren Street station, Victoria Line, London Underground, 11 July 2011 | London Transport | |||
HSE statement: Buncefield Oil Depot investigation | London Transport | |||
Camden Town and Hammersmith derailments - reports available | London Transport | |||
Central Line Press Reports | London Transport |