Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 22:29:56 on
Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Basil Jet remarked: I thought that buses running out of service were ordered to avoid their service route where possible, because people waiting for buses get annoyed if they see a bus with their chosen route number running out of service. A simpler solution is to replace the number with either "Not in Service" or blank. Buses don't have the route number painted on them permanently! -- Roland Perry |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 Jan, 10:21, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 22:29:56 on Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Basil Jet remarked: I thought that buses running out of service were ordered to avoid their service route where possible, because people waiting for buses get annoyed if they see a bus with their chosen route number running out of service. A simpler solution is to replace the number with either "Not in Service" or blank. Buses don't have the route number painted on them permanently! -- Roland Perry Of course LED displays would solve this, just a touch of a button and all routes nembers displays are removed. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2011\01\27 10:21, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 22:29:56 on Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Basil Jet remarked: I thought that buses running out of service were ordered to avoid their service route where possible, because people waiting for buses get annoyed if they see a bus with their chosen route number running out of service. A simpler solution is to replace the number with either "Not in Service" or blank. Buses don't have the route number painted on them permanently! http://bus38.online.fr/images/laurentlondon.jpg |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Roland Perry
writes Buses don't have the route number painted on them permanently! They do sometimes. See 3rd photo down at: http://www.showbus.com/gallery/lt/lubdart.htm Branded as the "Duck Bus" because it goes to Barnes Wetlands. But it was a silly idea because LU later had to use some of the vehicles on other routes in the area, and for some time visitors were terminally confused by the words "To and from Barnes Wetlands" painted on the vehicle, when in fact it was on a route that went nowhere near that destination. LU also route-branded some other services, such as the 285: see the last two photos on http://www.showbus.com/gallery/lt/lub4.htm -- Paul Terry |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, at 02:45:34 on Thu, 27 Jan 2011, George remarked: I thought that buses running out of service were ordered to avoid their service route where possible, because people waiting for buses get annoyed if they see a bus with their chosen route number running out of service. A simpler solution is to replace the number with either "Not in Service" or blank. Buses don't have the route number painted on them permanently! Of course LED displays would solve this, just a touch of a button and all routes nembers displays are removed. I can't remember the last time I saw a bus that didn't have a changeable display. Round here some of the single-deckers still have the manual scrolls, but all the double deckers and the newer single deckers have electronic displays. -- Roland Perry |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 10:48:23 on
Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Basil Jet remarked: Buses don't have the route number painted on them permanently! http://bus38.online.fr/images/laurentlondon.jpg Is that one still in service? -- Roland Perry |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 11:39:59 on Thu, 27
Jan 2011, Paul Terry remarked: Buses don't have the route number painted on them permanently! They do sometimes. See 3rd photo down at: http://www.showbus.com/gallery/lt/lubdart.htm Another lesson that usenet is the place to weed out edge cases. Well done! -- Roland Perry |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2011\01\27 12:27, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 10:48:23 on Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Basil Jet remarked: Buses don't have the route number painted on them permanently! http://bus38.online.fr/images/laurentlondon.jpg Is that one still in service? A fair point which hadn't occurred to me at all! While looking for a newer one I came across this, which amused me... http://www.se8signs.co.uk/images/photos/pic19_bus.jpg |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
[x-posted to uk.transport.buses - coz it's about buses!]
"Roland Perry" wrote: In message , at 11:39:59 on Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Paul Terry remarked: Buses don't have the route number painted on them permanently! They do sometimes. See 3rd photo down at: http://www.showbus.com/gallery/lt/lubdart.htm Another lesson that usenet is the place to weed out edge cases. Well done! Not so fast Mr Perry! ITYF there are many examples of where route specific branding has been used on buses around the country - so it's not really an edge case. No current examples from London readily spring to mind, but a number of Routemaster operated routes (e.g. 12, 36, 18, 73) used to go in for it (from the 90's onwards I think, i.e. post split up and privatisation of the LT buses operation) as did some other routes. There's even a Flickr group called "Buses With Route Branding" here... http://www.flickr.com/groups/994991@N25/ At first glance some of the entries in this group perhaps don't seem clear cut, others are of what one could deem as belonging in some sort of special category e.g. P&R and airport link buses, and others still don't show a route number but do display a list of destinations served, or else a route name (e.g. "Coastliner") - however I've had a quick gander and picked these out which all fit the bill of having the route number as a permanent fixture (well, permanent in a relative sense)... http://www.flickr.com/photos/52952806@N05/4905163784/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/8615623@N04/5252015953/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/52952806@N05/5263851251/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/cuthbus/5286871782/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/eybusman/5289299775/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/eybusman/5286983755/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/8615623@N04/5317022334/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/johnoram/4508428816/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/km_edinburgh/5336223964/ No route number but I like the name... http://www.flickr.com/photos/mcw1987/5270789917/ This webpage shows several route number branded buses in Reading: http://www.buszone.co.uk/OmniDekka.html Many other examples (both on that Flickr group and elsewhere) there should one wish to forage around for them - I think broadly speaking they're commonly flagship routes or else routes that have had some sort of relaunch (or indeed a new route). I assume the advantage of route branding that doesn't actually show the route number (of which there are many more examples) is that if that bus ends up 'off route', passengers are less likely to get in a muddle about what number the bus actually is (i.e. what route it's operating). |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
TfL consults on all TfL bus services going cashless | London Transport | |||
TfL consults on all TfL bus services going cashless | London Transport | |||
Maps of the Olympic cycling route and marathon route | London Transport | |||
Bus Route 186 Grahame Park Re-Route?? | London Transport | |||
Route 73 to go DD and Route 29 to go Bendi??? | London Transport |