Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#51
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 17:25:29 +0000, Sam Wilson
wrote: In my brother's village there is a small, free car park. The Parish Council have to pay VAT on the notional value of the parking service they provide. Never heard of that; I thought VAT was only charged on actual sales. Does that happen anywhere else? Neil -- Neil Williams, Milton Keynes, UK |
#52
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Neil Williams" wrote in message .net... On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 17:25:29 +0000, Sam Wilson wrote: In my brother's village there is a small, free car park. The Parish Council have to pay VAT on the notional value of the parking service they provide. Never heard of that; I thought VAT was only charged on actual sales. Does that happen anywhere else? When my flat management company "hired" a small one man clamping company, because we weren't VAT registered we had to pay the VAT due on the "fines" collected (I could never work out why the person being "fined" didn't have to pay it). tim |
#53
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"tim." wrote in message
"Neil Williams" wrote in message .net... On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 17:25:29 +0000, Sam Wilson wrote: In my brother's village there is a small, free car park. The Parish Council have to pay VAT on the notional value of the parking service they provide. Never heard of that; I thought VAT was only charged on actual sales. Does that happen anywhere else? When my flat management company "hired" a small one man clamping company, because we weren't VAT registered we had to pay the VAT due on the "fines" collected (I could never work out why the person being "fined" didn't have to pay it). That seems very odd -- if the firm's turnover is not large enough to have to register for VAT, it should not be charged and does not need to be paid to HMRC. And if the one man's clamping company was registered for VAT, he should be responsible for including it in the fines and paying the money over to HMRC. |
#54
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 20:26:59 -0000, "Recliner"
wrote: "tim." wrote in message "Neil Williams" wrote in message .net... On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 17:25:29 +0000, Sam Wilson wrote: In my brother's village there is a small, free car park. The Parish Council have to pay VAT on the notional value of the parking service they provide. Never heard of that; I thought VAT was only charged on actual sales. Does that happen anywhere else? When my flat management company "hired" a small one man clamping company, because we weren't VAT registered we had to pay the VAT due on the "fines" collected (I could never work out why the person being "fined" didn't have to pay it). That seems very odd -- if the firm's turnover is not large enough to have to register for VAT, it should not be charged and does not need to be paid to HMRC. And if the one man's clamping company was registered for VAT, he should be responsible for including it in the fines and paying the money over to HMRC. ITYF the flat management company was doing the extorting with the man in the van as their servant applying the clamps.. |
#55
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Charles Ellson" wrote in message
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 20:26:59 -0000, "Recliner" wrote: "tim." wrote in message "Neil Williams" wrote in message .net... On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 17:25:29 +0000, Sam Wilson wrote: In my brother's village there is a small, free car park. The Parish Council have to pay VAT on the notional value of the parking service they provide. Never heard of that; I thought VAT was only charged on actual sales. Does that happen anywhere else? When my flat management company "hired" a small one man clamping company, because we weren't VAT registered we had to pay the VAT due on the "fines" collected (I could never work out why the person being "fined" didn't have to pay it). That seems very odd -- if the firm's turnover is not large enough to have to register for VAT, it should not be charged and does not need to be paid to HMRC. And if the one man's clamping company was registered for VAT, he should be responsible for including it in the fines and paying the money over to HMRC. ITYF the flat management company was doing the extorting with the man in the van as their servant applying the clamps.. If the flat management company wasn't VAT registered (because the turnover's below the threshold), then no need to add VAT to the clamping fee. |
#56
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 19:05:58 -0000, "Recliner"
wrote: When my flat management company "hired" a small one man clamping company, because we weren't VAT registered we had to pay the VAT due on the "fines" collected (I could never work out why the person being "fined" didn't have to pay it). If the flat management company wasn't VAT registered (because the turnover's below the threshold), then no need to add VAT to the clamping fee. Unless it was the one man company that was registered for VAT, so the flat mgt co had to pay it but couldn't offset it against input tax? (Though, as the OP says, why wouldn't it get passed on to the clampees?) |
#57
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Charles Ellson" wrote in message ... On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 20:26:59 -0000, "Recliner" wrote: "tim." wrote in message "Neil Williams" wrote in message .net... On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 17:25:29 +0000, Sam Wilson wrote: In my brother's village there is a small, free car park. The Parish Council have to pay VAT on the notional value of the parking service they provide. Never heard of that; I thought VAT was only charged on actual sales. Does that happen anywhere else? When my flat management company "hired" a small one man clamping company, because we weren't VAT registered we had to pay the VAT due on the "fines" collected (I could never work out why the person being "fined" didn't have to pay it). That seems very odd -- if the firm's turnover is not large enough to have to register for VAT, it should not be charged and does not need to be paid to HMRC. And if the one man's clamping company was registered for VAT, he should be responsible for including it in the fines and paying the money over to HMRC. ITYF the flat management company was doing the extorting with the man in the van as their servant applying the clamps.. People have a choice to obey the sign that says: "Private property, no unauthorised parking, clamping in operation". I can assure you that the clamper was "responsible" in the way that he chose to clamp a car. He wasn't a rogue that clamped delivery vans etc temporarily stopped on the entrance driveway. Remember that these spaces that were being abused by outside parkers actually BELONG to the individual flat owners. Would you think it ok if someone drove up to your house and decided that it was OK for them to put their car in your garage without permission? tim |
#58
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Recliner" wrote in message ... "Charles Ellson" wrote in message On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 20:26:59 -0000, "Recliner" wrote: "tim." wrote in message "Neil Williams" wrote in message .net... On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 17:25:29 +0000, Sam Wilson wrote: In my brother's village there is a small, free car park. The Parish Council have to pay VAT on the notional value of the parking service they provide. Never heard of that; I thought VAT was only charged on actual sales. Does that happen anywhere else? When my flat management company "hired" a small one man clamping company, because we weren't VAT registered we had to pay the VAT due on the "fines" collected (I could never work out why the person being "fined" didn't have to pay it). That seems very odd -- if the firm's turnover is not large enough to have to register for VAT, it should not be charged and does not need to be paid to HMRC. And if the one man's clamping company was registered for VAT, he should be responsible for including it in the fines and paying the money over to HMRC. ITYF the flat management company was doing the extorting with the man in the van as their servant applying the clamps.. If the flat management company wasn't VAT registered (because the turnover's below the threshold), then no need to add VAT to the clamping fee. Actually the flat management company is unregistered because, as a resident owned company, it is not allowed to register. tim |
#59
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"tim." wrote in message
If the flat management company wasn't VAT registered (because the turnover's below the threshold), then no need to add VAT to the clamping fee. Actually the flat management company is unregistered because, as a resident owned company, it is not allowed to register. Why is that? I didn't think HMRC cared who the proprieter is. And, if not registered, how could the company even pay money to HMRC? I didn't think there was any mechanism to do so (and I've just completed my quarterly VAT return, so I do have some personal experience of VAT). |
#60
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Recliner" wrote in message ... "tim." wrote in message If the flat management company wasn't VAT registered (because the turnover's below the threshold), then no need to add VAT to the clamping fee. Actually the flat management company is unregistered because, as a resident owned company, it is not allowed to register. Why is that? It's not a trading company. I didn't think HMRC cared who the proprieter is. And, if not registered, how could the company even pay money to HMRC? It's registered at CoHouse and pays CT to HMRC, but it's not allowed to register for VAT. It pays money to HMRC for VAT in the same way that every other consumer does. tim |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
This Photography Lark is Getting Ridiculous | London Transport | |||
Commute from Harrow to Marlow | London Transport | |||
Commute btwn N.Acton-Wimbledon | London Transport | |||
Ealing to Oxford - anyone advise me on the commute? | London Transport | |||
Cottage 35mins commute to Euston | London Transport |