Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can someone please explain why all the Oyster fares to the four c2c stations
which are outside the Travelcard zones but inside the Oyster PAYG area include validity within zones 7, 8 and 9? These three zones have absolutely nothing to do with c2c, and the number of people who need validity e.g. to Grays *and* to Zone 9 must be vanishingly small. The area containing these four stations is contiguous with Zone 6, so why not (for example) "Zone 1-6 + Grays"? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Salmon" wrote in message
... Can someone please explain why all the Oyster fares to the four c2c stations which are outside the Travelcard zones but inside the Oyster PAYG area include validity within zones 7, 8 and 9? These three zones have absolutely nothing to do with c2c, and the number of people who need validity e.g. to Grays *and* to Zone 9 must be vanishingly small. The area containing these four stations is contiguous with Zone 6, so why not (for example) "Zone 1-6 + Grays"? Having said that, I see there is a Zone 6 + Grays fare, but it's the same as the Zones 5-9 + Grays fare! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Feb 10, 1:01*am, "John Salmon" wrote: Can someone please explain why all the Oyster fares to the four c2c stations which are outside the Travelcard zones but inside the Oyster PAYG area include validity within zones 7, 8 and 9? These three zones have absolutely nothing to do with c2c, and the number of people who need validity e.g. to Grays *and* to Zone 9 must be vanishingly small. *The area containing these four stations is contiguous with Zone 6, so why not (for example) "Zone 1-6 + Grays"? I think conceptually you might not be looking at this in quite the right way, though I certainly see where you're coming from. An Oyster single fare is for the journey made, i.e. it doesn't include validity beyond that journey - I don't know the inside workings of Oyster PAYG revenue apportionment, which I'd think are hellishly complicated (and far more dynamic than the divvying up of the Travelcard loot), but at a complete guess I'd suggest that c2c would probably get a greater cut of the money from a Grays to Fenchurch St plus zone 1 Tube journey than if that same passenger then continued on to travel out to Amersham on the Met line - most pax from Grays being rather more likely to do the former than the latter. Given that, in terms of determining the fares structure I'd suggest it's simply easier for there to simply be a 'zone 1-9 + Grays' fare than for there to be both 'z1-6 + Grays' and 'z1-9 + Grays' fares - in effect once you're coming into London from Grays then any travel out to zones 7-9 comes for 'free' - however, how the money is actually divided up between c2c and LU/LO depends on what you do and where you travel (which in most cases isn't going to involve heading out to Bucks or Herts!). |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Feb 10, 1:04*am, "John Salmon" wrote: "John Salmon" *wrote: Can someone please explain why all the Oyster fares to the four c2c stations which are outside the Travelcard zones but inside the Oyster PAYG area include validity within zones 7, 8 and 9? These three zones have absolutely nothing to do with c2c, and the number of people who need validity e.g. to Grays *and* to Zone 9 must be vanishingly small. *The area containing these four stations is contiguous with Zone 6, so why not (for example) "Zone 1-6 + Grays"? Having said that, I see there is a Zone 6 + Grays fare, but it's the same as the Zones 5-9 + Grays fare! Just to clarify, it's a 'zones 6-9 + Grays' fare - and the fact it's being the same price as a 'zones 5-9 + Grays' fare doesn't surprise me greatly as many fares are 'stepped' in such a manner. (Incidentally you'll note the lack of separate 'z2-9 + Grays/Watford Jn' caps, which instead default to the 'z1-9 + Grays/Watford' caps - all non-z1 caps and Day Travelcards, including the z2-6 and z2-9 flavours, were abolished in the new year's fares change.) |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mizter T" wrote
Just to clarify, it's a 'zones 6-9 + Grays' fare - and the fact it's being the same price as a 'zones 5-9 + Grays' fare doesn't surprise me greatly as many fares are 'stepped' in such a manner. http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tickets/14414.aspx shows a Zone 6 + Grays fare. That seems to be the only fare involving Grays that does *not* include Zones 7-9. Perhaps it's a mistake? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Salmon" wrote: "Mizter T" wrote Just to clarify, it's a 'zones 6-9 + Grays' fare - and the fact it's being the same price as a 'zones 5-9 + Grays' fare doesn't surprise me greatly as many fares are 'stepped' in such a manner. http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tickets/14414.aspx shows a Zone 6 + Grays fare. That seems to be the only fare involving Grays that does *not* include Zones 7-9. Perhaps it's a mistake? I apologise John, you're absolutely correct. That page is the 'National Rail' fares page, and I suspect I was just looking at the 'Tube, DLR and LO' fares page which shows a "Zones 6-9 + Grays" fare, but doesn't show a "Zone 6 + Grays" fare. I'd strong suspect it's a mistake, yes. TBH, and I'm quite possibly being a bit dim here, but the inclusion of zones 7-9 in the NR-only fares table seems a bit of a nonsense anyway. I was going to suggest that it's only done for the sake of consistency with the Tube/DLR fare table, but then why show NR fares for say z2-9 when it's impossible to make such journeys at the NR rate (bearing in mind that journeys on LO's Watford-Euston DC line are charged at the TfL/Tube rate, including those made on parallel LM services). Indeed I see there are NR fares shown for the following AFAICS 'impossible' journeys - z1-7/8/9; z2-7/8/9; z3-7/8/9 - but there's nothing for z4/5/6 to z7/8/9. Additionally there are fares shown for z1/2/3-9 + Watford Jn, but nothing for z4/5/6-9 + Watford Jn. Meanwhile going out to Grays, there's z1/2/3/4/5-9 + Grays and then, as you say, "Zone 6 + Grays" which seems inconsistent and should I think be z6-9 + Grays. But the inconsistency seems like nothing compared to the question of why these NR-rate fares even appear at all, when I can't see what journeys they can possibly refer to. At a complete guess, maybe they exist to provide future extra-territorial expansion of the zonal system beyond zone 6, should any TOC sign up for that - though it'd seem more likely that they'd want to opt for the arrangement used for fares to/from Watford Jn and also to/from the four c2c stations yonder zone 6. (Though perhaps it might all start getting too unwieldy and TfL could say that 'you can join in Oyster PAYG, but you've got to use zones 7-9' - but I'm just wildly speculating here.) All that said, I could of course be missing something blindingly obvious which would explain it all. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oyster PAYG beyond zones with c2c? | London Transport | |||
c2c storms ahead with introduction of Oyster | London Transport | |||
c2c withdraw Dec 06 timetable | London Transport | |||
C2C train service problems | London Transport |