London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #271   Report Post  
Old December 23rd 03, 03:38 PM posted to uk.transport,uk.rec.driving,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2003
Posts: 13
Default reducing congestion


"Silk" wrote in message
...
Oliver Keating wrote:


but the working class have
remained pretty much static, they haven't shared in the growth at all.


That's probably because they're lazy whingebags.

The worst ones are the working class who imagine their new money makes them
middle class.



  #272   Report Post  
Old December 23rd 03, 03:40 PM posted to uk.transport,uk.rec.driving,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2003
Posts: 40
Default reducing congestion

Conor wrote:


Dairy.


Except the bit about making hay for the cattle to eat in the winter,
that is.

  #273   Report Post  
Old December 23rd 03, 03:41 PM posted to uk.transport,uk.rec.driving,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2003
Posts: 40
Default reducing congestion

Conor wrote:


My solution? Stop their benefits.


But, you keep telling us there's no work. Make your mind up.

  #274   Report Post  
Old December 23rd 03, 03:44 PM posted to uk.transport,uk.rec.driving,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2003
Posts: 40
Default reducing congestion

Purditer wrote:


The worst ones are the working class who imagine their new money makes them
middle class.


Not as bad as the career dole scroungers who think they are working class.

  #275   Report Post  
Old December 23rd 03, 03:45 PM posted to uk.transport,uk.rec.driving,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2003
Posts: 13
Default reducing congestion


"Silk" wrote in message
...
Purditer wrote:


The worst ones are the working class who imagine their new money makes

them
middle class.


Not as bad as the career dole scroungers who think they are working class.

and no one is as bad as Bob Crow.




  #276   Report Post  
Old December 23rd 03, 03:53 PM posted to uk.transport,uk.rec.driving,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2003
Posts: 40
Default reducing congestion

Purditer wrote:


and no one is as bad as Bob Crow.


Who?

  #277   Report Post  
Old December 23rd 03, 03:55 PM posted to uk.transport,uk.rec.driving,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2003
Posts: 40
Default reducing congestion

Cast_Iron wrote:


Ah at last, the standard "**** you Jack, I'm OK" attitude.


It's **** or be ****ed, unfortunately. That's why we are supposed to
have governments and leaders to guide us.

  #278   Report Post  
Old December 23rd 03, 03:55 PM posted to uk.transport,uk.rec.driving,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 102
Default reducing congestion

"Silk" wrote in message
...
Conor wrote:

Dairy.


Except the bit about making hay for the cattle to eat in the winter,
that is.


If the cattle were having grass and hay rather than
feed/concentrates, which season is for hay making?


  #279   Report Post  
Old December 23rd 03, 03:59 PM posted to uk.transport,uk.rec.driving,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2003
Posts: 13
Default reducing congestion


"Silk" wrote in message
...
Purditer wrote:


and no one is as bad as Bob Crow.


Who?

General Secretary of the RMT


  #280   Report Post  
Old December 23rd 03, 04:08 PM posted to uk.transport,uk.rec.driving,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 313
Default reducing congestion

JNugent wrote:
wrote:

JNugent wrote:


wrote:


It was Maggie and co that forced an end to tied
housing.


Sheer, biased, blinkered, knee-jerk, nonsense.


[ ... ]

So it wasn't a Thatcher government the introduced the
"Right to Buy" legislation then?


No.
As you would know (if you were not simply motivated by
unthinking knee-jerk socialism - if you'll forgive the
tautology), the RTB:


(a) was introduced under the Edward Heath government of
1970-1974


Whether you choose to believe it or not some people in
this world are
not driven by ideology or dogma but are cpable of
establishing the
facts for themselves and making up their own minds.


You can't just "make up your own mind [sic]" to fabricate
history. The RTB council houses (for tenatnts of councils)
was established in the early 1970s under the Heath
government. That's a fact. Stamping your foot won't make it
untrue.

Wrong (again)
"The statutory Right To Buy was introduced on the 3rd
October 1980 in England, Wales and Scotland."
http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib...9/rp99-036.pdf

Don't believe everything you believe in Labour government
propaganda. Even the paper you have cited makes it clear
that this was a *statutory* scheme (my emphasis). There are
other sorts of scheme.

The RTB was introduced under Edward Heath, but with a
(major) flaw - councils didn't *have* to comply (they could
adopt a policy of not selling). Of course, this was still
better than the previous situation, where a council
couldn't sell even if they wanted to. In effect, it was
mainly Conservative councils that allowed their tenants to
buy under the Heath legislation. Changes in council control
could mean a change in sales policy (either way) - very
unsatisfactory for tenants wishing to buy. That flaw was
corrected under Thatcher, but the RTB was first established
under Heath (and believe me, the Labour Party squawked
enough about it at the time).


So there was no "right to buy", merely that the council could sell if they
so chose.


and (b) only applied to council houses - and
certainly not to tied cottages on farms.


Your evidence is from?


Re-read your own citation - you will see (if you read it)
that it applies only to council properties (there has never
been a right to force a private landlord to sell -
leaseholds of certain blocks of flats excepted). Even
housing association tenants find that the RTB (rather
unfairly, IMHO) doesn't apply to them.


Why should people in Council or other housing have the right to buy and
preclude someone else who needs a low rent place to live from have the
advantage that the buyer has had? Why not create a scheme in which long term
council tenants can get assistance to buy a house on the open market?





Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Legal challenges and congestion charging for 30 second journey leaving zone? Nick London Transport 27 December 5th 03 04:20 PM
The effects of a road congestion tax Tom Sacold London Transport 77 November 30th 03 02:51 AM
Congestion charge cheat Robin May London Transport 55 October 25th 03 09:54 AM
Crapita bailed-out over congestion charging Ade V London Transport 40 August 8th 03 10:30 AM
Extending the congestion charge zone Dave London Transport 13 July 29th 03 10:47 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017