"Greg Hennessy" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 21:13:37 +0000 (UTC), "Cast_Iron"
wrote:


The only thing 'caught out' here is your rather limited
intellect which managed to contradict itself multiple times
in the one thread.

The next time you attempt to falsely ascribe views you
pathetic train spotter I suggest finding someone else.



How sad that you cannot separate the use of a common phrase to describe
an
attitude

Falsely ascribing views and running away when challenged could be
described
as an attitude. Given you had no evidence to support this supposition, it
clearly was a term of emotive abuse, never mind a clear logical fallacy in
the form of an appeal to consequences.


to hurling personal abuse. So what were you saying about limited
intellect?


That would be the lying goit who posted

"Wasn't me that introduced cars, was it you?"




How sad that you haven't yet learnt about discussion and debate to explore
options and possibilities. Perhaps when you get to be a big boy you'll be
able to play with the grown ups.