Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 14:45:12 on Tue, 8
Mar 2011, Paul Terry remarked: I believe some new arrangements were made regarding bus stops recently, although there seems to be all sorts of confusion about what exactly these arrangements are. http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/reques..._at_compulsory I can hardly believe I've read it correctly, but it seems to say that TfL are standardizing on the "compulsory" flag, at which passengers must always request the bus to stop. No, it seems to be saying the driver must treat every stop as compulsory, unless convinced otherwise. In Geneva, all stops appear to be compulsory (and the bus does stop) even if there's no-one stood at it and the bus clearly has no passengers either standing or making their way to the door. This gets a bit tedious when the route is lightly loaded! -- Roland Perry |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roland Perry" wrote: In message , at 14:45:12 on Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Paul Terry remarked: I believe some new arrangements were made regarding bus stops recently, although there seems to be all sorts of confusion about what exactly these arrangements are. http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/reques..._at_compulsory I can hardly believe I've read it correctly, but it seems to say that TfL are standardizing on the "compulsory" flag, at which passengers must always request the bus to stop. No, it seems to be saying the driver must treat every stop as compulsory, unless convinced otherwise. In Geneva, all stops appear to be compulsory (and the bus does stop) even if there's no-one stood at it and the bus clearly has no passengers either standing or making their way to the door. This gets a bit tedious when the route is lightly loaded! What a muddle. The one thing I'm definitely very much against is the bus having to stop at each and every stop regardless, i.e. like the Geneva situation you outline above - that'd just be utterly daft. My practice these days is to generally always hail the bus or ring the bell, though that said I don't think I ring the bell when the bus is approaching a major bus stop as I know it'll stop (though someone else will prob ring the bell anyway) - though if it was late (or v early) or the bus wasn't at all busy then I probably would ring the bell just to be sure (the old rule for night buses was that every stop was to be treated as a request stop). Likewise if I'm at a relatively busy bus stop and it's self evident that people want to get on the bus then I quite likely wouldn't hail it, though again it's quite likely someone would (albeit perhaps a 'half-hearted' hail, IYSWIM). Some clarity and passenger instruction / communication is needed, me thinks. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 15:33:30 on
Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Mizter T remarked: Some clarity and passenger instruction / communication is needed, me thinks. Nottingham buses have an illuminated sign near the driver which says "Stopping" if anyone has rung the bell. That way you can tell if anyone else has rung it before you. -- Roland Perry |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roland Perry" wrote: In message , at 15:33:30 on Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Mizter T remarked: Some clarity and passenger instruction / communication is needed, me thinks. Nottingham buses have an illuminated sign near the driver which says "Stopping" if anyone has rung the bell. That way you can tell if anyone else has rung it before you. London buses have this too - it's now incorporated into the iBus information display. My comment was more just about how the present situation is a bit of an unclear muddle. (Though TBH I'd rather have this vague muddle than buses having to stop at each and every stop regardless.) |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 16:58:53 -0000, "Mizter T"
wrote: London buses have this too - it's now incorporated into the iBus information display. People seem to think that it's an invitation to press the button again... My comment was more just about how the present situation is a bit of an unclear muddle. (Though TBH I'd rather have this vague muddle than buses having to stop at each and every stop regardless.) It seems to work quite well at the moment. Perhaps the answer *is* to quietly change the bus stop flags and let people get on with what they'd do anyway. Everywhere else I have travelled, a ding of the bell to get off is expected, at any stop. In London, it no longer does any harm. When getting on the bus, it's not so clear-cut. A Berlin bus driver once got quite irate at my wave. Nobody else minds. Perhaps a theatrical extraction of change or ticket, or lunge towards the bus stop pole is a compromise. Eye contact with the driver can work as well, and ensure a suitable position for the front doors, where that's the done thing. I wonder whether Roland's experience of Geneva was more about timetable adherence than any rules about stopping, at least that's what it seemed like to me when I was in Zurich. Richard. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 00:47:24 on
Wed, 9 Mar 2011, Richard remarked: London buses have this too - it's now incorporated into the iBus information display. People seem to think that it's an invitation to press the button again... Us Nottingham folk seem to be able to work out that if the sign is lit up there's no need to ring again. When getting on the bus, it's not so clear-cut. A Berlin bus driver once got quite irate at my wave. Nobody else minds. Perhaps a theatrical extraction of change or ticket, or lunge towards the bus stop pole is a compromise. Eye contact with the driver can work as well, and ensure a suitable position for the front doors, where that's the done thing. Again, here in Nottingham what people do is stick out an arm, and the bus puts on its left indicator - if it hasn't done so already as a result of dropping someone off. I wonder whether Roland's experience of Geneva was more about timetable adherence than any rules about stopping, at least that's what it seemed like to me when I was in Zurich. In off-peak periods there are a couple of places that my Nottingham buses are sometimes clearly waiting for the timetable to catch up, but the Geneva ones treat each bus stop the way you are supposed to approach a "Stop" road junction. ie come to a halt for a split second, then immediately move off (assuming its safe). Avoiding getting ahead of the timetable can be done by driving slower between stops. The roads there are clear enough (or there are bus priority measures) so there's little conflicting traffic to worry about most of the time. -- Roland Perry |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is the most recent response I have received (albeit almost two
years ago now) on this topic .... "Thank you for contacting London Buses, regarding a route 345 bus driver, who failed to stop for you at 0822 hours at the end of Coldharbour Lane, heading towards Camberwell on 17 March 2009. "All drivers trained by London General undergo a thorough and intensive training programme, which includes a strong emphasis on customer care. Carrying passengers to their destinations is, after all, the very nature of the service that we provide and we expect our staff to do so in a safe, courteous and caring manner. "During training, drivers are instructed to stop at all white compulsory stops and to be fully alert and aware of passengers wishing to board at red request stops. I am sorry you have had reason to report the contrary on this occasion." The implication appears to be that the distinction between compulsory and request stops remains, despite its absence from any TfL publicity. But there is clearly no enthusiasm from TfL to enforce it. Writing letters of complaint elicit a polite reply, like the one above, followed by an assurance that action has been taken, but nothing ever changes. peter |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 15:33:30 on Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Mizter T remarked: Some clarity and passenger instruction / communication is needed, me thinks. Nottingham buses have an illuminated sign near the driver which says "Stopping" if anyone has rung the bell. Most new buses all over the world now have this. tim |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote
In Geneva, all stops appear to be compulsory (and the bus does stop) even if there's no-one stood at it and the bus clearly has no passengers either standing or making their way to the door. This gets a bit tedious when the route is lightly loaded! One reason to ring the bell on country bus routes is that standing up or moving before the bus actually stops can be unsafe, especially if one is not very secure on ones feet. So expecting the driver to notice only works when the passenger feels it safe to move when the bus isn't stationary. -- Mike D |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message 01cbdde1$8fc4a380$LocalHost@default, at 02:22:21 on Wed, 9
Mar 2011, Michael R N Dolbear remarked: One reason to ring the bell on country bus routes is that standing up or moving before the bus actually stops can be unsafe, especially if one is not very secure on ones feet. So expecting the driver to notice only works when the passenger feels it safe to move when the bus isn't stationary. That depends how far away the bells are. If this is an issue, then the buses here have about half the seats within reach of the bell without getting up. -- Roland Perry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ECML: Too much competition or just enough? | London Transport | |||
Too much information! | London Transport | |||
Carry too much on tube | London Transport | |||
Too many bus stops in london? | London Transport | |||
Bus stop sign covered and marked 'not in use' and a temporary bus stop sign right next to it | London Transport |