Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andrew P Smith" wrote in message ... In article , Richard J. writes Andrew P Smith wrote: In article , Alek writes snip. Anybody care to speculate if TfL will utilise the SUNBUS (Nice) Revenue Protection Model...???? Well, that's as may be in France, but this is the UK. No requirement to carry ID, and the law doesn't permit the RPI's to demand anything. If they are not happy with the info you give then they could call the BTP but that would hold up the train. If they tried to forcibly remove you from the train that would be assault. Is that true? I would have thought that they were entitled to use reasonable force to eject an unauthorised person from private property, like bouncers in clubs or pubs. I would take it as assault. Do you know if the law exists for an RPI to forcibly remove someone from LUL property? -- Andrew Electronic communications can be altered and therefore the integrity of this communication can not be guaranteed. Views expressed in this communication are those of the author and not associations or companies I am involved with. Any property owner has the right to use reasonable force to remove undesirables and to answer your initial question Rip's can check details over the phone using the voters roll etc, any failure to show up on this usually means a BOP reception committee and criminal charges for evasion, rather just the civil penalty a PF is. C |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andrew P Smith" wrote in message ... In article , Richard J. writes Andrew P Smith wrote: In article , Alek writes snip. Anybody care to speculate if TfL will utilise the SUNBUS (Nice) Revenue Protection Model...???? Well, that's as may be in France, but this is the UK. No requirement to carry ID, and the law doesn't permit the RPI's to demand anything. If they are not happy with the info you give then they could call the BTP but that would hold up the train. If they tried to forcibly remove you from the train that would be assault. Is that true? I would have thought that they were entitled to use reasonable force to eject an unauthorised person from private property, like bouncers in clubs or pubs. I would take it as assault. Do you know if the law exists for an RPI to forcibly remove someone from LUL property? -- Andrew Electronic communications can be altered and therefore the integrity of this communication can not be guaranteed. Views expressed in this communication are those of the author and not associations or companies I am involved with. Any property owner has the right to use reasonable force to remove undesirables and to answer your initial question RPI's can check details over the phone using the voters roll etc, any failure to show up on this usually means a BTP reception committee and criminal charges for evasion, rather just the civil penalty a PF is. C |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
(Chippy) wrote: (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote in message ... When a fare dodger was playing dead the other day on a train I was on the Inspector couldn't touch him to try and wake him up and eventually called an ambulance for a special stop at Stevenage in case he really was dead. If that practice were universal it would preclude the giving of first-aid, including resuscitation. How many ticket inspectors give first aid? It's a matter of training and the detailed circumstances of the case. -- Colin Rosenstiel |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message ,
Colin Rosenstiel writes In article , (Chippy) wrote: (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote in message ... When a fare dodger was playing dead the other day on a train I was on the Inspector couldn't touch him to try and wake him up and eventually called an ambulance for a special stop at Stevenage in case he really was dead. If that practice were universal it would preclude the giving of first-aid, including resuscitation. How many ticket inspectors give first aid? It's a matter of training and the detailed circumstances of the case. Many RCIs are first-aiders too; we can all do the training if we want to. As for the detailed circumstances of the case, FIRST-aid is just that; you do what you can until the professionals arrive.... -- Kat I've always wanted to be somebody. Next time I'll be more specific. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Kat
writes I see what you mean but doesn't an a caution have to precede an arrest? No. -- Andrew Electronic communications can be altered and therefore the integrity of this communication can not be guaranteed. Views expressed in this communication are those of the author and not associations or companies I am involved with. |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , MrC
writes "Andrew P Smith" wrote in message ... In article , Richard J. writes Andrew P Smith wrote: In article , Alek writes snip. Anybody care to speculate if TfL will utilise the SUNBUS (Nice) Revenue Protection Model...???? Well, that's as may be in France, but this is the UK. No requirement to carry ID, and the law doesn't permit the RPI's to demand anything. If they are not happy with the info you give then they could call the BTP but that would hold up the train. If they tried to forcibly remove you from the train that would be assault. Is that true? I would have thought that they were entitled to use reasonable force to eject an unauthorised person from private property, like bouncers in clubs or pubs. I would take it as assault. Do you know if the law exists for an RPI to forcibly remove someone from LUL property? -- Andrew Electronic communications can be altered and therefore the integrity of this communication can not be guaranteed. Views expressed in this communication are those of the author and not associations or companies I am involved with. Any property owner has the right to use reasonable force to remove undesirables and to answer your initial question RPI's can check details over the phone using the voters roll etc, any failure to show up on this usually means a BTP reception committee and criminal charges for evasion, rather just the civil penalty a PF is. C Well, my name doesn't appear on the public version of the electoral roll. I could say that I've just moved to the property the previous week and as the electoral roll is a 'snapshot' of those at that address at one point in the year that is entirely plausible. I do not believe you are correct that any property owner in the UK has the right to use reasonable force to remove undesirables. Sine when did a RPI become the owner of NR?? -- Andrew Electronic communications can be altered and therefore the integrity of this communication can not be guaranteed. Views expressed in this communication are those of the author and not associations or companies I am involved with. |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Andrew P Smith
writes In article , MrC writes "Andrew P Smith" wrote in message ... In article , Richard J. writes Andrew P Smith wrote: In article , Alek writes snip. Anybody care to speculate if TfL will utilise the SUNBUS (Nice) Revenue Protection Model...???? Well, that's as may be in France, but this is the UK. No requirement to carry ID, and the law doesn't permit the RPI's to demand anything. If they are not happy with the info you give then they could call the BTP but that would hold up the train. If they tried to forcibly remove you from the train that would be assault. Is that true? I would have thought that they were entitled to use reasonable force to eject an unauthorised person from private property, like bouncers in clubs or pubs. I would take it as assault. Do you know if the law exists for an RPI to forcibly remove someone from LUL property? -- Andrew Electronic communications can be altered and therefore the integrity of this communication can not be guaranteed. Views expressed in this communication are those of the author and not associations or companies I am involved with. Any property owner has the right to use reasonable force to remove undesirables and to answer your initial question RPI's can check details over the phone using the voters roll etc, any failure to show up on this usually means a BTP reception committee and criminal charges for evasion, rather just the civil penalty a PF is. C Well, my name doesn't appear on the public version of the electoral roll. I could say that I've just moved to the property the previous week and as the electoral roll is a 'snapshot' of those at that address at one point in the year that is entirely plausible. I do not believe you are correct that any property owner in the UK has the right to use reasonable force to remove undesirables. Sine when did a RPI become the owner of NR?? The LUL & NR byelaw number 24 states the following: (2) Removal of persons (i) Any person who is reasonably believed by an authorised person to be in breach of any of these Byelaws shall leave the railway immediately if asked to do so by an authorised person. (ii) Any person who is reasonably believed by an authorised person to be in breach of any of these Byelaws and who fails to desist or leave when asked to do so by an authorised person may be removed from the railway by an authorised person using reasonable force. This right of removal is in addition to the imposition of any penalty for the breach of these Byelaws. This is followed by details of who an authorised person is 25 Interpretation (1) Definitions In these Byelaws the following expressions have the following meanings: "authorised person" means; (i) a person acting in the course of his duties, who is an employee or agent of or any other person authorised by the Operator or authorised by a person operating any railway assets, and Byelaw number 18 requires you to show a ticket - therefore 'no ticket - no travel' and you must leave if requested and may be removed if you don't -- Martin Summerfield |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Martin Summerfield
writes In message , Andrew P Smith writes In article , MrC writes "Andrew P Smith" wrote in message ... In article , Richard J. writes Andrew P Smith wrote: In article , Alek writes snip. Anybody care to speculate if TfL will utilise the SUNBUS (Nice) Revenue Protection Model...???? Well, that's as may be in France, but this is the UK. No requirement to carry ID, and the law doesn't permit the RPI's to demand anything. If they are not happy with the info you give then they could call the BTP but that would hold up the train. If they tried to forcibly remove you from the train that would be assault. Is that true? I would have thought that they were entitled to use reasonable force to eject an unauthorised person from private property, like bouncers in clubs or pubs. I would take it as assault. Do you know if the law exists for an RPI to forcibly remove someone from LUL property? -- Andrew Electronic communications can be altered and therefore the integrity of this communication can not be guaranteed. Views expressed in this communication are those of the author and not associations or companies I am involved with. Any property owner has the right to use reasonable force to remove undesirables and to answer your initial question RPI's can check details over the phone using the voters roll etc, any failure to show up on this usually means a BTP reception committee and criminal charges for evasion, rather just the civil penalty a PF is. C Well, my name doesn't appear on the public version of the electoral roll. I could say that I've just moved to the property the previous week and as the electoral roll is a 'snapshot' of those at that address at one point in the year that is entirely plausible. I do not believe you are correct that any property owner in the UK has the right to use reasonable force to remove undesirables. Sine when did a RPI become the owner of NR?? The LUL & NR byelaw number 24 states the following: (2) Removal of persons (i) Any person who is reasonably believed by an authorised person to be in breach of any of these Byelaws shall leave the railway immediately if asked to do so by an authorised person. (ii) Any person who is reasonably believed by an authorised person to be in breach of any of these Byelaws and who fails to desist or leave when asked to do so by an authorised person may be removed from the railway by an authorised person using reasonable force. This right of removal is in addition to the imposition of any penalty for the breach of these Byelaws. This is followed by details of who an authorised person is 25 Interpretation (1) Definitions In these Byelaws the following expressions have the following meanings: "authorised person" means; (i) a person acting in the course of his duties, who is an employee or agent of or any other person authorised by the Operator or authorised by a person operating any railway assets, and Byelaw number 18 requires you to show a ticket - therefore 'no ticket - no travel' and you must leave if requested and may be removed if you don't Martin, thank you. That is exactly what I was looking for. This backs up what I once saw on the Central where 2 SA's literally dragged 2 women beggars off a train. Think it was Marble Arch - certainly the centre of town. -- Andrew Electronic communications can be altered and therefore the integrity of this communication can not be guaranteed. Views expressed in this communication are those of the author and not associations or companies I am involved with. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
fare evasion penalties | London Transport | |||
Bendy Buses & Fare Evasion | London Transport | |||
New style barriers and fare evasion | London Transport | |||
Thameslink Fare Evasion | London Transport | |||
Fare evasion | London Transport |